Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS): Wave 6, 2018-2020 (ICPSR 38016)
Version Date: Mar 13, 2024 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Peggy C. Giordano, Bowling Green State University;
Monica A. Longmore, Bowling Green State University;
Wendy D. Manning, Bowling Green State University
Series:
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38016.v1
Version V1
Alternate Title View help for Alternate Title
Summary View help for Summary
Prior research on parental incarceration has documented negative effects on various forms of child well-being ranging from conduct problems to academic deficits and eventually, an intergenerational cycle of criminal justice involvement. Yet as the National Academy of Sciences committee report on incarceration recently concluded, existing research has not adequately assessed the range of other family circumstances and disadvantages that may co-vary with the parent's criminal justice system involvement, and knowledge about basic mechanisms underlying incarceration effects remains markedly incomplete. This study builds on, a ten-year mixed method longitudinal study, the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS), that has focused on the lives of a sample of men and women interviewed first as adolescents and four additional times across the transition to adulthood. The TARS study contains data involving patterns and seriousness of parental offending over the complete study period, as well as about other time-varying factors hypothesized to mediate incarceration-child well-being associations.
The primary goal of this study is to collect survey data to examine the effect of parental incarceration on a range of child well-being outcomes, including conduct problems, academic readiness/achievement and emotional and physical health, among children born to participants in the TARS study. Child well-being outcomes includes internalizing and externalizing problems, academic readiness/attainment, and emotional and physical health. This study also includes parental disadvantages across the three subgroups of system contact, including variation in objective and subjective indicators of economic marginality, relationship difficulties, perceived stress, depression, and lack of social support.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
State
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
- For additional information on the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study, please visit the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS): Wave 6 website.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The study focused on three specific aims including: (1) data collection and analyses of parents' criminal justice contact and their reports of child well-being outcomes, (2) data collection and assessment of variability in crime and incarceration exposure across the child's full social network (including multigenerational patterns of parental incarceration), and (3) data collection and investigation of incarceration-specific hypotheses about mediating mechanisms.
Sample View help for Sample
The final sample (n = 990), included 559 women and 431 men with children from 62 schools across seven school districts in Ohio.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Young adults who were in the 7th, 9th, and 11th grade in Lucas County, Ohio during the 2000-2001 school year.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
1,021 respondents participated in the fifth wave of data collection, 77.6% of the original sample (n=1,316 at the first wave).
HideNotes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.