Longitudinal Examination of Victimization Experiences of Latinos (LEVEL): Extending the Bias Victimization Study, San Diego, CA, Galveston, TX, Houston, TX, Boston, MA, 2019-2020 (ICPSR 38228)

Version Date: Oct 11, 2023 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Carlos A. Cuevas, Northeastern University (Boston, Mass.); Amy Farrell, Northeastern University (Boston, Mass.)

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38228.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

LEVEL, 2019-2020

The Longitudinal Examination of Victimization Experiences of Latinos (LEVEL) study surveyed Latino adults from four major cities across the United States to evaluate the past-year incidence and prevalence of bias or hate motivated victimization. This study is a follow-up to the Understanding and Measuring Bias Victimization Against Latinos study, ICPSR 37598, that was conducted in 2018-2019. The hope of this follow-up study, in conjunction with the original study "Wave 1", is to provide greater context into bias victimization by breaking apart the diverse nature of Latinx communities in regards to immigration status, language use, origin, acculturation, and enculturation.

Cuevas, Carlos A., and Farrell, Amy. Longitudinal Examination of Victimization Experiences of Latinos (LEVEL): Extending the Bias Victimization Study, San Diego, CA, Galveston, TX, Houston, TX, Boston, MA, 2019-2020. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38228.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2017-VF-GX-0005)

City

Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Use Agreement, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

2019-10 -- 2020-09
2019-10 -- 2020-09
  1. The "Wave 1" data, ICPSR 37598, using the ID variable UNIQUEID_NUM, can be merged with this study, "Wave 2" data, using the ID variable W2_UNIQUEID. One of the variables will need to be renamed to match the variable name in the other file prior to merging the files together.
  2. The data file combines participants from Galveston and Houston into one group. There is no variable that separates them out between the two cities.

  3. A zipped package of 7 Stata .do syntax files will be provided to all approved restricted-use data applicants. These syntax files were provided by the Principal Investigators to detail the steps taken in creating, computing, and recoding the non-questionnaire variables located at the last half of the data file. A "README File" created by ICPSR also accompanies the zipped package.

  4. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subsample of the surveyed population as part of the larger research project. However, these data are not a part of this study collection. The purpose of the qualitative interviews were to better understand how immigration status, culture and language proficiency shape victimization risk, reporting and negative mental health consequences.

Hide

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the past-year incidence and prevalence of bias or hate motivated victimization. Primary research questions included:

  • What are the revictimization patterns across the two waves for the various forms of victimization and overall total victimization?
  • What factors are associated with victimization of Latino individuals across a range of violent and non-violent crimes? Specifically, how does immigration status, language proficiency, acculturation, and enculturation impact the likelihood that a Latino/a is victimized or revictimized?
  • What factors are associated with negative mental health consequences? Specifically, how does immigration status, language proficiency, acculturation, and enculturation impact negative health outcomes for those Latinos who are victims of crime?
  • What factors are associated with help-seeking and reporting of victimization to criminal justice agencies? Specifically, how does immigration status, language proficiency, acculturation, and enculturation impact help-seeking and reporting for those Latinos who are victims of crime?

At the end of the Wave 1 survey participants were asked to give consent to a follow up survey. If the participant assented they provided their contact information such as phone numbers and email address. Data collection lasted from October 2019 to July 2020. Surveys were conducted in the participant's preferred language (English or Spanish), and participants were sent unique links to the survey either through text or email. Most participants completed the survey, on average, in about 40 minutes.

The original sample for Wave 1 was a convenience sample with adult respondents aged 18 or older recruited through community-based agencies and at Latino-focused events. A community-based sample was chosen since it has the ability to recruit harder to reach, more transient, or more vulnerable individuals within the community.

Longitudinal

Latino adults aged 18 or older residing in San Diego, CA, Galveston and Houston, TX, and Boston, MA.

Individual

The data file consists of 323 cases with 1,525 total variables. The first half of the data file consists of the variables from the questionnaire. Some of the major sections of the questionnaire include:

  • Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans (AR) - speaking, writing, reading, and watching things in English and Spanish
  • SAFE Stress Scale (AS) - five-point rating scale of how stressful certain situations are
  • Bias Victimization (BV) - asks about 14 total events where person felt they were targeted due to their ethnic or racial background; then there are follow-up questions on who did it, their race and gender; how many times it happened and physical injuries because of incident
  • Lifetime Victimization (LV) - asks about 18 total events, some of the events are similar to the other section but these do not include the same bias / racial component; then there are similar follow-up questions about each event answered yes to
  • Trauma Symptom Inventory (TS) - four-point frequency subscales from the Trauma Symptom Inventory - 2 (TSI-2) covering topics of depression, anxiety, anger, and dissociation
  • Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDDS) - six-point frequency scale of negative interaction with others
  • Political Questions (PQ) - knowledge of government and public affairs at local and national level, involvement in voting and other civic activities
  • Demographics (DE) - education, income, employment, relationship status, race, sexual orientation, children, and residency status

The last half of the data file includes calculated or recoded variables created by the Principal Investigators. These include intermediate variables that identify bias victimization versus those that identify lifetime victimization. This section of variables also includes the calculated scores for the multiple instruments / scales included in the survey.

The overall retention rate from the original sample, Wave 1, to this follow-up study, Wave 2, was 35.5% (323 out of 910). Of those Wave 1 respondents who consented to be re-contacted for Wave 2 that response rate was 47.9%. For each city the number of participants who completed "Wave 2" were:

  • San Diego, CA: 85 of 303 original participants (28.1%)
  • Galveston and Houston, TX: 115 of 302 original participants (38.1%)
  • Boston, MA: 123 out of 305 original participants (40.4%)
    • Bias Victimzization Questionnaire for Latinos (BVQ-L)
    • Lifetime Trauma and Victimization History (LTVH)
    • Brief Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican-Americans (Brief-ARSMA-II)
    • Social, Attitudinal, Familial, and Environmental (SAFE) Stress Scale
    • Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q)
    • Trauma Symptom Inventory 2 (TSI-2)

    Hide

    2023-10-11

    2023-10-11 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

    • Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.

    Hide

    Not applicable

    Hide

    Notes

    • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

    • One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.