Identifying Sexual Assault Mechanisms Among Diverse Women, New York State, 2016-2017 (ICPSR 37450)
Version Date: Apr 29, 2021 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Amy L. Hequembourg, State University of New York at Buffalo
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37450.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study offers novel insights into mechanisms associated with sexual assault (SA) among sexual minority women (SMW). Experiences of bias and stigma contribute to lower rates of SA reporting by this population. This results in victims with unmet needs and fewer criminal prosecutions of SA perpetrators. This study used a mixed-methods approach to collect data from lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women to instigate changes that would improve responses from law enforcement, victim services, and anti-violence programs that serve SMW.
This study comprised of three parts a: baseline survey, qualitative interview, and daily survey. Self-reported baseline questionnaires included topics like lifetime victimization (childhood sexual abuse, adult sexual aggression, and assault), discrimination, distress, mental health, alcohol use, and sexual history. The qualitative interviews focused on the most recent, and when applicable, the most salient adult sexual assault (ASA) incident. Interviews began by asking the participants to describe their ASA incidents with follow-probes asking about the victimization, perpetrator characteristics (gender and relationship to participant), and context of assault (role of alcohol or drugs and setting). Participants were also asked if they discussed the assault with anyone and their reasons for disclosure or non-disclosure. As well as short and long-term coping patterns. The daily survey asked participants about their mood, alcohol use, drinking contexts, and sexual experiences (consensual and non-consensual).
This study contains demographic information such as: age, race, income, education, and BMI.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
Buffalo, NY
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
The transcripts of the interviews are not included in this study's release at this time.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
Drawing on both minority stress theory and the larger sexual assault (SA) literature among heterosexual women, this study tries to gain new perspectives on the mechanisms that elevate the harm of SA for sexual minority women (SMW). The stress of having a stigmatized sexual identity is a critical factor for underlying mental health and substance use disparities among this disenfranchised group. Moreover, most SMW who are sexually assaulted do not receive the necessary services to address their post-assault needs. Nor the public and policy attention necessary to end this violence. The inadequacies of SMW's post-assault care are due, in part, to a lack of knowledge among victim assistance providers and the criminal justice system about the unique needs of SMW who experience SA. This study sought to examine this through 4 different goals:
- Report the prevalence of SA and associated outcomes by sexual identity and examine the influence of sexual identity and ASA.
- Explore qualitative differences in adult sexual assault (ASA) characteristics and post-assault disclosure and coping mechanism organized by sexual identity.
- Explore quantitative differences in daily alcohol use by sexual identity given its role in ASA.
- Explore the differences in the role of alcohol in ASA incidences and the impact of alcohol-involved assaults on disclosure and coping mechanisms by sexual identity.
Study Design View help for Study Design
The researchers utilized a mixed-method approach to understand adult sexual assault (ASA) and its outcomes across sexual identity groups. Participants were asked to complete a phone screener for eligibility, a baseline self-report questionnaire, a qualitative interview when applicable (i.e. if the participant had ASA experience), and a daily diary survey. The daily diary surveys were accessible between 9 pm to 5 am and asked about the participant's experiences since they woke up that day for 12 consecutive weeks.
Sample View help for Sample
A total of 246 self-identified sexual minority women and exclusively heterosexual women participated in this multi-method study. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (RDS), with 15 initial seed participants, with five women from each sexual identity group. These initial seeds were recruited via community contacts and flyers that were located in non-alcohol-oriented establishments (e.g., coffee shops or restaurants). Throughout the study, an additional 39 women were recruited as seeds through newspaper ads. Each participant was paid 10 dollars for every person they recruited. Participants were told they could earn a 5 dollars steering incentive if they referred a women-of-color to the study.
All recruitment materials called for lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual cisgender women between the ages of 18 to 35 who were interested in participating in a study on daily stress. Transgender and gender non-conforming women were excluded from the study as there was not a sufficient sample of individuals in these groups.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Cisgender women who are between the ages of 18-35 years old, who identify as lesbian, bisexual, or heterosexual, drank one standard drink in the past month, and are fluent in English.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
None
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2021-04-29
Version History View help for Version History
2021-04-29 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.