Impacts of Social Proximity to Bias Crime Among Compact of Free Association (COFA)-Migrants in Hawaii, 2017-2018 (ICPSR 37330)
Version Date: Oct 28, 2021 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Rebecca L. Stotzer, University of Hawaii at Manoa
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37330.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study utilized respondent-driven sampling (RDS) among Compact of Free Association (COFA)-migrants in Hawaii to explore the harms of bias crimes on migrant communities. To examine the impacts of bias crimes on communities, the investigators examined the diffusion of negative psychological impacts, community impacts, and perceptions of safety for those who had been direct victims, those in the COFA-migrant community who are close to someone who has been a victim (proximal victim) but are not direct victims, and those who are members of the community but have not been a direct victim or know someone close to them who was a direct victim.
This study also examined the how negative impacts of bias crime ultimately impact the adaption of COFA-migrants who have immigrated in the attempt to build new lives in Hawaii.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
Hawaii Islands
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reasons for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
Goal 1: To determine the prevalence of bias crimes against COFA-migrants in Hawaii.
Goal 2: To determine the diffusion effects of bias crime victimization in regard to psychological, social, and safety consequences based on social proximity to bias crime along three categories: a) COFA-migrants who have been directly victimized, b) COFA-migrants who have not been directly victimized but have an intimate acquaintance they know was victimized (proximal victims), and c) COFA-migrants who have not been the direct target or known someone personally who has been the victim of a bias crime (distant victims).
Goal 3: To determine how the negative impacts of bias crime (including consequences to psychological well-being, feelings of safety, and sense of community) impact the adaptation of COFA-migrants to living in Hawaii.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Researchers collaborated with University of Hawai'i at Mānoa and We Are Oceania, a local Micronesian-serving community organization
An in-person interview was designed with the assistance of cultural experts and bias crime experts to test the factors associated with acculturation and the impact of experiencing bias crimes, or knowing of people within one's group who experienced bias crimes, on that process.
A respondent-driven sampling (RDS) sampling methodology was used to recruit participants for an in-person interview to help us better understand the community impact of bias crimes on vulnerable migrant/immigrant communities.
Sample View help for Sample
Respondent driven sampling (RDS)
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
People from the Micronesian region 18 years and older who have lived in Hawaii for at least one consecutive year.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Demographic variables: Arriving in Hawai'i vs. Living in Hawaii
Community Sequelae: Sociocultural Adaptation, Sense of Community, Colonial Mentality Scale
Psychological Sequelae: Psychological Resilience, Social Support, World Assumption Scale, depression, anxiety
Safety Sequelae: Feelings of safety, fear of crime, trust in police
Bias Crime and Discrimination Experiences: Discrimination, bias crime victim status
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
Sociocultural Adaptation Scale, Colonial Mentality Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Zimet et al (1988) Social Support Scale, World Assumption Scale, CES-D10, GAD-7.
HideNotes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.