Linking Theory to Practice: Examining Geospatial Predictive Policing, Denver, Colorado, 2013-2015 (ICPSR 37299)
Version Date: Feb 26, 2020 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Craig D. Uchida, Justice & Security Strategies, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37299.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This research sought to examine and evaluate geospatial predictive policing models across the United States. The purpose of this applied research is three-fold: (1) to link theory and appropriate data/measures to the practice of predictive policing; (2) to determine the accuracy of various predictive policing algorithms to include traditional hotspot analyses, regression-based analyses, and data-mining algorithms; and (3) to determine how algorithms perform in a predictive policing process.
Specifically, the research project sought to answer questions such as:
- What are the underlying criminological theories that guide the development of the algorithms and subsequent strategies?
- What data are needed in what capacity and when?
- What types of software and hardware are useful and necessary?
- How does predictive policing "work" in the field? What is the practical utility of it?
- How do we measure the impacts of predictive policing?
The project's primary phases included: (1) employing report card strategies to analyze, review and evaluate available data sources, software and analytic methods; (2) reviewing the literature on predictive tools and predictive strategies; and (3) evaluating how police agencies and researchers tested predictive algorithms and predictive policing processes.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
Other
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of this applied research is three-fold: (1) to link theory and appropriate data/measures to the practice of predictive policing; (2) to determine the accuracy of various predictive policing algorithms to include traditional hotspot analyses, regression-based analyses, and data-mining algorithms; and (3) to determine how algorithms perform in a predictive policing process.
Study Design View help for Study Design
The project's primary phases included: (1) employing report card strategies to analyze, review and evaluate available data sources, software, and analytic methods; (2) reviewing the literature on predictive tools and predictive strategies; and (3) evaluating how police agencies and researchers tested predictive algorithms and predictive policing processes.
Primarily, this study utilized a secondary analysis of time-series crime data obtained from DPD (2013-2015). These data were used to create benchmarks for evaluating the effectiveness of various crime forecasting algorithms.
As part of the data assessment process, researchers created data report cards to evaluate publicly available crime datasets on data quality and usability. For practitioners seeking implementation, vendor assessment tools to evaluate predictive software were created. Researchers also compiled a matrix of available software and models for predictive analysis, highlighting type of data used, mode of analysis, and crimes predicted.
Sample View help for Sample
All crimes reported to DPD between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015 were included in the datasets for analysis.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
All records of crimes reported to Denver Police Department (DPD) within the study time frame.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Source View help for Data Source
Crime dataset from Denver Open Data Catalog
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Crime dataset variables include date and time of crime event and reporting, offense description, geographic grid, and NIBRS and UCR codes.
In the grid cells datasets, crimes are categorized into 5 groups: assault (excluding homicide and sexual assault), auto crimes, burglary, robbery, and gun-involved crimes. Variables include aggregated monthly counts for each type, forecasts for various baseline algorithms, and evaluations (hit, miss, false negative, false positive).
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Not applicable.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
None
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2020-02-26
Version History View help for Version History
2020-02-26 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.