Skip to Main Content
N A C J D logo
  • Login/Create Account
  • Login/Create Account
  • Discover Data
  • Discover Data
    • Discover Data
    • NIJ Data Deposits
    • OJJDP Data Deposits
    • BJS Data Deposits
    • Other Data Deposits
  • Share Data
  • Share Data
    • Share Data
    • NIJ Data Deposits
    • OJJDP Data Deposits
    • BJS Data Deposits
    • Other Data Deposits
  • About
  • About
    • About NACJD
    • Our Team
    • Announcements
    • Sponsors
    • Contact
  • Resources
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • Learning and Data Guides
    • Restricted Data Resources
      • Restricted Data at NACJD
      • Restricted Data Access
      • Application Requirements
      • Sample Forms
    • Analyze Data Online
  • Help

Filters

 Hide

  • United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice2
  • United States Department of Justice. Office for Improvements in the Administration of Justice1
 Hide

  • Public Use2
 Hide

  • court costsremove filter
  • probation2
  • administrative costs1
  • case processing1
  • caseloads1
view all
 Hide

  • SPSS1
 Hide

  • New/updated this week0
  • New/updated this month0
  • New/updated this quarter0
  • New/updated this year0
 Hide

  • quantitative2
 Hide

  • Ohio2
  • United States2
  • Cincinnati1
  • Delaware1
  • Florida1
view all
 Hide

  • Public Data3
 Hide

 Hide

  • Carey, Shannon1
  • Hartigan, Richard1
  • Lindquist, Christine1
  • Rempel, Michael1
  • White, Inc.1
view all
 Hide

  • ICPSR.XVII.E.2
  • ICPSR.XII.1
  • NACJD.III.1
  • NACJD.V.1
  • NACJD.VI.1
view all
 Hide

  • survey2
  • admin1
 Hide

  • face-to-face interview1
  • record abstracts1
 Hide

  • survey2
  • admin1
 Hide

  • study3
 Hide

  • ICPSR3
  • NACJD3
 Hide

  • Center for Court Innovation1
  • NPC Research1
  • RTI International1
  • White, Inc.1
 Hide

Search Results

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 results.

search tips
  • Search terms can be anywhere in the study: title, description, variables, etc.
  • Because our holdings are large, we recommend using at least two query terms:
    rural economy
    home ownership
    higher education
  • Keywords help delimit the breadth of results. Therefore, use as many as required to achieve your desired results:
    elementary education federal funding
  • Our search will find studies with derivative expressions of your query terms: A search for "nation"will find results containing "national"
  • Use quotes to search for an exact expression:
    "social mobility"
  • You can combine exact expressions with loose terms:
    "united states" inmates
  • Exclude results by using a MINUS sign:
    elections -sweden -germany
    will exclude swedish and german election studies
  • On the results page, you will be able to sort and filter to further refine results.
     Hidden

    Study Title/Investigator
    Released/Updated
    1.
    Cost Effectiveness of Misdemeanant Probation in Hamilton County, Ohio, 1981-1982 (ICPSR 8259)
    Hartigan, Richard
    This research was designed to determine whether the supervision of misdemeanant probationers was cost-effective for increasing the level of successful probation completions in Hamilton County, Ohio. The primary objective was to examine the relationships among these factors: supervision costs, the collection of court costs, fines, and restitution, types of supervision, risk assessment, and probationer conduct for the population of probationers. Probationers were initially classified according to risk assessment and then randomly assigned to a supervision category. The probationer's risk potential was a numerical score derived from demographic background variables, prior record, and history of substance use. The DSCP (Degree of Successful Completion of Probation) was developed specifically to measure probationer conduct and to compare trends and relationships. The variables examined in the study include: risk assessment at intake, supervision level assigned, number of times the probationer was assigned to probation, start and planned termination dates, date of last status change, status at termination, degree of successful completion of probation achieved, costs incurred in administering probation, and amounts collected from each probationer for court costs, restitution, and fines. Although data were collected on 7,072 misdemeanant probation experiences, there are only 2,756 probationers included in the study. The remaining 4,316 cases were excluded due to failure of the probationer to show up for screening or for other reasons that did not meet the research criteria.
    2006-01-18
    2.
    Multi-site National Institute of Justice Evaluation of Second Chance Act Reentry Courts in Seven States, 2012-2016 (ICPSR 36748)
    Carey, Shannon; Rempel, Michael; Lindquist, Christine
    These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The study used a multi-method approach including 1. a process evaluation in all eight sites involving yearly site visits from 2012 to 2014 with key stakeholder interviews, observations, and participant focus groups; 2. a prospective impact evaluation (in four sites) including interviews at release from jail or prison and at 12 months after release (as well as oral swab drug tests) with reentry court participants and a matched comparison group; 3. a recidivism impact evaluation (in seven sites) with a matched comparison group tracking recidivism for 2 years post reentry court entry and 4. a cost-benefit evaluation (in seven sites) involving a transactional and institutional cost analysis (TICA) approach. Final administrative data were collected through the end of 2016. This collection includes four SPSS data files: "interview_archive2.sav" with 746 variables and 412 cases, "NESCCARC_Archive_File_3.sav" with 518 variables and 3,710 cases, "Interview Data1.sav" with 1,356 variables and 412 cases, "NESCCARC Admin Data File.sav" with 517 variables and 3,710 cases, and three SPSS syntax files: "Interview Syntax.sps", "archive_2-17.sps", and "NESCCARC Admin Data Syntax.sps".
    2018-07-24
    3.
    Survey of Judges on the Role of Courts in American Society, 1979 (ICPSR 7824)
    Yankelovich, Skelly; White, Inc.
    This survey was conducted in order to obtain from judges their views and experiences regarding the role of courts in American society, specifically on issues of caseload management. From a sample representing five regions of the country, 104 federal and state judges were interviewed about their general work practices and performance in court over the year previous to August 1979. Variables describe the amount of time judges spent on routine judicial activities, characteristics of cases requiring excessive time, the mechanisms employed in the resolution of civil disputes, techniques for reducing or more expeditiously handling heavy caseloads, and suggestions for extra-judicial dispute settlement processes that could serve as alternatives to courts. Data are also available on each judge's legal education, legal experience, and personal background.
    1992-02-16
      I C P S R
      Bureau of Justice Statistics National Institute of Justice   Office of Juvenile Justice and Deliquency Prevention

      This website is funded through Inter-agency agreements through the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this website (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided).

      Privacy Policy

      © 2025 The Regents of the University of Michigan. ICPSR is part of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.