Patient Centered Adaptive Treatment Strategies (PCATS) Using Bayesian Causal Inference [Methods Study], 2015-2020 (ICPSR 39520)
Version Date: Oct 21, 2025 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Bin Huang, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR39520.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
Treatment plans for patients with long-term health problems such as diabetes or arthritis often change over time. Such plans are called adaptive treatment plans as doctors adapt treatment based on the patient's health problem and response to earlier treatments. Adaptive treatment plans are common, but the methods to assess how well a plan works may not always provide accurate results. To know which plans are best for patients, researchers need better methods to compare these adaptive plans.
In this study, the research team developed and tested a new statistical method and looked at whether it could more accurately compare adaptive treatment plans.
To access the methods and software, please visit the PCATS Application.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
Simulated data, observational data from electronic health records from a pediatric rheumatology clinic. The project aims were: Aim 1. To develop, refine, and disseminate bayesian causal inference methods for evaluating clinical effectiveness and for informing better PCATS. Aim 2. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the recommended ATS for patients with pcJIA using real-world data
Study Design View help for Study Design
The research team developed a causal inference method called GPMatch that combines two statistical techniques, Gaussian process covariance function matching and Bayesian nonparametric modeling, in one step.
Using simulated data, the research team compared GPMatch against Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) and other commonly used statistical methods for adaptive and non-adaptive treatment strategies. To test the robustness of the methods in the presence of model misspecification, the team intentionally introduced error into the statistical models.
The research team then applied GPMatch to empirical data from electronic health records. The team compared the effectiveness of two adaptive treatment strategies for children with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA):
The early combination plan, in which patients start two types of medicine after diagnosis The step-up plan, in which patients start with one type of medicine and then add another type later
Universe View help for Universe
Pediatric rheumatology patients
Data Source View help for Data Source
Simulated data, observational data from electronic health records from a pediatric rheumatology clinic
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
ICPSR usually offers files in multiple formats for researchers to be able to access data and documentation in formats that work well within their needs. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR’s Accessibility Center.
