Study to Promote Innovation in Rural Integrated Telepsychiatry (SPIRIT), Arkansas, Michigan, and Washington, 2016-2020 (ICPSR 38542)
Version Date: Dec 14, 2022 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
John C. Fortney, University of Washington
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38542.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study addressed whether it is better to expand the scope of collaborative care programs to treat patients with more complex psychiatric disorders or to facilitate successful referrals to specialty mental health care. The primary objective of this study is to compare Telepsychiatry Collaborative Care (TCC) and Telepsychiatry Enhanced Referral (TER) from the patient and provider perspective. The secondary objective is to determine whether patients not engaging and responding to TER, improve with Phone-Psychiatry Enhanced Referral (PER). There are four specific aims.
Aim #1: To quantitatively compare the treatment experience, engagement, self-reported clinical outcomes, and recovery-oriented outcomes of patients initially randomized to TCC and TER.
Aim #2: For the subset of patients randomized to TER who do not engage in treatment and are still symptomatic at 6 months, quantitatively compare treatment experience, treatment engagement, self-reported clinical outcomes and recovery-oriented outcomes of patients randomized to continued-TER or PER.
Aim #3: To gain an in-depth understanding of patients' and providers' treatment experience, qualitatively compare those randomized to TCC, TER and PER.
Aim #4: To examine treatment heterogeneity among subgroups of patients randomized to TCC and TER based on race/ethnicity, age and clinical severity.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
State
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to the data in this collection is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is better to expand the scope of collaborative care programs to treat patients with more complex psychiatric disorders or to facilitate successful referrals to specialty mental health care.
Study Design View help for Study Design
24 Community Health Center (CHC) systems located in the states of Arkansas, Michigan and Washington were chosen to participate in the study. These participating clinics screened patients for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Bipolar Disorder (BD). Adult patients who screened positive for PTSD and/or BD were enrolled. After the initial screening and recruitment, a two staged randomization was implemented.
The Telepsychiatry Enhanced Referral (TER) model is an adaptive intervention and therefore, a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design was used to compare the two treatment arms. Adaptive interventions are used to customize the treatment for patients whose needs are not being met, defined by a tailoring variable. The tailoring variable in the SPIRIT trial was whether each study participant did or did not engage in TER care as determined by intermediate clinical evaluation.
First Stage Randomization: The first stage randomization was conducted at the patient level immediately after being administered the baseline research assessment. Randomization was stratified by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) (i.e., for each clinic, equal numbers of patients was allocated to Telepsychiatry Collaborative Care (TCC) and TER) to avoid bias due to site-level variation. In addition, the study team stratified by disorder to ensure that equal numbers of patients screening positive for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder PTSD and BD were randomized to each group. Because patients with BD are often at elevated risk for experiencing trauma, many patients with BD also screened positive for PTSD. For patients who screened positive for both PTSD and BD, the study team categorized them as BD for purposes of stratification.
Second Stage Randomization: Patients initially randomized to the TER arm were randomized a second time if they were not engaged in TER during the first six months of the trial. Specifically, the tailoring variable (non-engagement) was defined as less than or equal to 2 interactive video encounters in the first 6 months. The number of telepsychiatry and telepsychology encounters as documented by the telepsychiatrist and telepsychologist was used to define the tailoring variable. At six months, those patients not engaged in care were randomized (a second time) to either continued TER or to Phone Enhanced Referral (PER). Randomization was again stratified by clinic and having a positive screen for PTSD or BD.
For each participant, three phone/web surveys were completed: an initial baseline survey, a 6-month follow up survey and a 12-month follow up survey.
Sample View help for Sample
24 primary care clinics without on-site psychiatrists or psychologists in 3 states (Arkansas, Michigan, and Washington) were included in the sampling process. Adult patients who screened positive for posttraumatic stress disorder and/or bipolar disorder were enrolled. This resulted in a sample of 1,004 participants.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Adult primary care patients
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
This study includes variables related to general demographics, health related issues, and health conditions and symptoms.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
There were 1004 initial participants in the baseline survey. For the 6-month follow up survey, 720 participants were retained. For the 12-month follow up survey, 635 were retained.
HideNotes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.