A Place-based Approach to Address Youth-Police Officer Interactions in Crime Hotspots: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 3 U.S. cities, 2021-2023 (ICPSR 38930)
Version Date: Mar 27, 2025 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Weiwei Liu, NORC at the University of Chicago;
Bruce Taylor, NORC at the University of Chicago
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38930.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study combines elements of community policing and problem-oriented policing (POP) to examine the effect of a place-based policing strategy that emphasizes POP and patrol officer training in law enforcement officers (LEO)-youth interactions and youth crime prevention (POP for Youth[YPOP]) on crime outcomes and related community outcomes in 128 crime hotspots across three mid-Atlantic sites within the same county. Between July 2021 and November 2022, one third of the hotspots received traditional POP services, one third received POP for Youth treatment (POP with an emphasis on positive youth interactions), and the remaining third received regular patrol services for an intervention period of 13-16 months. The YPOP intervention was evaluated using multiple data sources, including reported intervention activities, official police data, and community surveys. The main objectives of this YPOP initiative were to: (1) Examine the impact of YPOP on crime; and (2) explore the impact of YPOP on young community member's perception of safety (victimization and fear of crime), perceptions of police and relations with the community, police legitimacy, and community collective efficacy in targeted areas.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test whether place-based proactive problem-oriented policing (POP) strategies combined with training for patrol law enforcement officers (LEOs) in youth interactions and crime prevention can be implemented to achieve crime reduction and broader community/youth and officer benefits. The study had three main goals: (1) to examine the effectiveness of POP for Youth in reducing property and violent crime; (2) to assess the effect of the intervention on youth perceptions of police legitimacy, experience of LEO-youth interactions, and feelings of safety; (3) to (qualitatively) assess the impact on LEO attitudes, knowledge and experience of interacting with youth.
The central research questions were:
- What is the impact of POP Only and POP for Youth interventions on violent and property crime counts in crime hot spots?
- What is the impact of POP Only and POP for Youth on youth's experience of LEO-youth interactions, their perception of safety, and policy legitimacy in targeted hot spots?
- What is the impact of POP for Youth on LEOs' attitudes, knowledge, and skills, their experience of LEO-youth interactions, and their perception of policy safety?
Study Design View help for Study Design
The study was conducted in three mid-Atlantic cities within the same county. These three cities have similar demographic characteristics, with populations ranging from 25,000 to 75,000 people and city square mileage between 6.49 and 68.99 square miles.
Sample View help for Sample
A US Postal Service (USPS) delivery sequence file (DSF) as the sampling frame was used. For all cities, the samples were drawn using a stratified random sampling approach stratified by hot spot size.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
English-speaking persons aged 12 to 24 years old living in one of the selected hot spot areas, for 6 months or longer.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Wave 1 Survey Response Rate: 2.0%
Wave 2 Survey Response Rate: 2.2%
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2025-03-27
Version History View help for Version History
2025-03-27 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.