Developing a Taxonomy To Understand and Measure Outcomes of Success in Community-Based Elder Mistreatment Interventions, New York City, New York, 2018-2019 (ICPSR 37955)
Version Date: Mar 16, 2022 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Mark Lachs, Cornell University. Weill Cornell Medicine;
David Burnes, University of Toronto
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37955.v1
Version V1 (see more versions)
You are viewing an older version of this study. A newer version is available (view all versions)
Additional details may be in the Version History or Data Collection Notes fields of the study metadata.
Summary View help for Summary
Research tools available to help advance knowledge of effective community-based elder mistreatment (EM) interventions are limited. The field lacks an understanding of what success means in EM response program (EMRP) interventions, which work directly with victims to reduce the risk of re-victimization. Without establishing indicators of EMRP success, it is not possible to develop valid intervention outcome measures to compare different EMRP models toward the development of evidence-based practice. Informed by the EMRP practice principle of older adult self-determination, this study developed a victim-centric taxonomy of case outcomes that indicate EMRP success.
This study drew on two sources of data, including interviews with EM victims and a scoping review to inform taxonomy development. Prioritizing the perspective of victims, this study conducted interviews with 28 victims involved in EMRP services who vary in EM subtype, gender, and race/ethnicity.
The taxonomy of successful EMRP outcomes will serve as important research infrastructure to support the development of EMRP intervention outcome measurement in future research.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
Agency site
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
This data collection may not be used for any purpose other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited. To protect respondent privacy, this data collection is restricted from general dissemination. To obtain this file, researchers must agree to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Data Use Agreement in accordance with existing ICPSR servicing policies.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of this study is to develop a taxonomy of case outcomes that indicate success in the elder mistreatment response program (EMRP) intervention context, verify the validity of the developed taxonomy of EMPR case outcomes, and use an intervention outcome measurement strategy called goal attainment scaling (GAS) as a foundation to develop preliminary measurement scales for each outcome in the taxonomy.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Using a descriptive phenomenological qualitative research methodology, this study conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with elder mistreatment (EM) victims to elicit perceptions about what outcomes constitute elder mistreatment response program (EMRP) success. This study also conducted a scoping review of existing EMRP research to understand how prior intervention studies have defined EMRP success. Qualitative analysis of verbatim EM victim interviews transcripts followed an iterative, constant comparison process by two independent raters using NVivo software.
Sample View help for Sample
Participants were recruited from community-based elder mistreatment (EM) intervention programs in New York City. EM victimization was determined through formal assessment procedures that gathers evidence from multiple sources, including interviews with the suspected victim and relevant others (e.g., family members, caregiver); direct observation and physical evidence (e.g., injuries, home environment conditions); and corroborating documentation from other entities involved with the older adult (e.g., social services, family physician, financial institution, etc.). For the purpose of this study, EM victimization included one or more of the following subtypes: physical, sexual, emotional, or financial abuse, or neglect.
Recruitment followed a "warm hand-off" approach in which the victim's trust of the practitioner is extended to the researcher. Older adults who agreed to be contacted and learn more about the research project received a telephone call from a member of the research team. If interested in study participation, an in-person meeting was scheduled to provide consent and participate in an interview. Interviews took place at a time convenient to the participant and location where they felt safe and comfortable. To honor the time and effort involved in study participation, participants were provided cash compensation.
Universe View help for Universe
English-speaking adults aged 60+ who have experienced substantiated emotional/physical/sexual/financial abuse or neglect and had the capacity to determine EMRP-related case outcomes.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
The quantitative dataset in this study includes administrative variables and a combination of categorical and string variable responses to the topic of elder mistreatment. Demographic variables include race/ethnicity, age, gender, educational background, and marital status.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Not available.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
Goal Attainment Scales (GAS)
Hide