Search results

Showing 1 – 2 of 2 results.
Curated

Evaluating Observational Data Analyses: Confounding Control and Treatment Effect Heterogeneity [Methods Study], United States, 2013-2019 (ICPSR 39485)

Released/updated on: 2025-09-03
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2013-01-01--2019-01-01

A randomized trial is one of the best ways to learn if one treatment works better than another. Randomized trials assign patients to different treatments by chance. But they are not always affordable, and they take a long time to complete.

When randomized trials aren't possible, researchers can use observational studies to learn how treatments work. In observational studies, researchers look at what happens when patients and their doctors choose the treatments. Traits such as age or health may affect treatment choices. These traits may also affect patients' responses to treatment, making it hard to know if the treatment or the traits affected the patients' responses.

Some study designs and statistical methods may help address this problem and make results from observational studies more useful. These methods can give researchers more data about whether treatments work and how the same treatment can affect groups of patients differently.

The research team conducted three studies to test different methods of designing and analyzing observational studies. They wanted to know if observational studies that used these methods produced results similar to randomized trials.

Curated

Making Better Use of Randomized Trials: Assessing Applicability and Transporting Causal Effects [Methods Study], United States, 2015-2020 (ICPSR 39630)

Released/updated on: 2025-12-11
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2015-01-01--2020-01-01

Randomized controlled trials, or RCTs, look at how well treatments work. But people who take part in RCTs may differ from patients who receive care in clinics. For instance, patients who take part in RCTs may be less likely to smoke or may have fewer health problems. These differences can affect how well a treatment works. As a result, a treatment may work differently for a patient receiving care in a clinic than it did for patients who took part in the RCT.

Researchers can use statistical methods to account for differences in patient traits and behaviors. In this project, the research team developed and tested new methods to account for these differences. They used the methods to apply RCT results to patients receiving care in clinics.

To access the methods and software, please visit the generalizability_g_form_IPW and ExtendingInferences GitHub repositories.