Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States]: Cities Sample (ICPSR 8002)
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States]: National Sample (ICPSR 8003)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1987-1998 (ICPSR 9513)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1999 (ICPSR 3104)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2000 (ICPSR 3495)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2001 (ICPSR 3498)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2002 (ICPSR 4109)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2003 (ICPSR 4631)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2004 (ICPSR 4628)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2005 (ICPSR 4609)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2006 (ICPSR 20102)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2007 (ICPSR 22625)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2008 (ICPSR 25426)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2009 (ICPSR 28603)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2010 (ICPSR 35338)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2011 (ICPSR 35341)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2012 (ICPSR 35344)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2013 (ICPSR 35347)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2014 (ICPSR 36570)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2015 (ICPSR 36573)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2016 (ICPSR 36980)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2017 (ICPSR 37991)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2018 (ICPSR 38006)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2019 (ICPSR 38021)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2020 (ICPSR 38551)
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2021 (ICPSR 38554)
Research-Based Practice Guide to Address Gang Violence, 9 U.S. states, 2018-2021 (ICPSR 38327)
The project focused specifically on strategies and approaches explicitly intended to reduce gun-related violence committed by young people between the ages of 10 and 25 who may also be associated with gangs/groups, including interventions that solely or primarily serve youth. The study team did not focus on all strategies designed to reduce youth violence, nor on gang prevention and intervention efforts not expressly intended to reduce gun violence and homicide. Based on this framing, the study team focused on interventions that are immediate responses to an acute problem, rather than those that address risk factors associated with violence broadly. This work drew on three main models of interventions: Spergel Model of Gang Intervention and Suppression ("Spergel")/Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Comprehensive Gang Model (CGM) intervention models, focused deterrence models, and public health models. Both the review of literature and scan of practice include some interventions that do not fit into any of these models.
The review of literature included identification and synthesis of research on the implementation and impact of relevant violence prevention, reduction, and control strategies. The literature review only included interventions that have published research about their efficacy. The scan of practice identified 14 interventions and conducted 13 virtual site visits including interviews and observations. Site selection was based on criteria and with input from a group of subject-matter experts, National Institute of Justice (NIJ), and OJJDP. The scan of practice was not a comprehensive scan and did not include a representative sample by type or location of intervention.
Research-Survivor Formative Evaluation of San Francisco's Anti-Human Trafficking Task Forces, California, 2016-2018 (ICPSR 37178)
Research Triangle Institute (RTI) International, in partnership with MD Consulting, conducted a researcher-survivor-ally participatory process evaluation of the Task Force on Anti-Human Trafficking in San Francisco. The purpose of the Task Force is to review current efforts to improve the city's response to human trafficking and identify gaps in services for survivors. Participants include representatives from social service organizations, law enforcement, community-based organizations, philanthropic and advocacy groups, and concerned citizens.
This study included an integrated, multi-level approach of community involvement. People who have experienced a severe form of human trafficking are represented at all levels of the research process, including that of co-principal investigator (co-PI), research assistants (RAs) and members of the Community Advisory Board (CAB). The goals of this evaluation were to evaluate components of task force implementation through a comprehensive process evaluation, conduct a secondary analysis of law enforcement data, and create a research infrastructure that supports the intellectual and career development of people who have experienced trafficking.
Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) Implementation and Collaborative Process: What Works Best for the Criminal Justice System? 2010-2013 [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 34795)
Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs) are interventions that were created to coordinate efforts of the legal, medical, mental health systems, and rape crisis centers, in order to improve victims' help seeking experiences and legal outcomes. This study examined the relationship between SART structure and effectiveness by conducting a national scale study of SARTs and a smaller detailed network analysis of four SARTs.