Extending Bystander Intervention Prevention Models from College Campuses to the Workplace, United States, 2022 (ICPSR 38659)

Version Date: Oct 12, 2023 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Sarah McMahon, Rutgers University

Series:

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38659.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

In this exploratory study, the research team examined factors such as power dynamics and social identity that affect a bystander's (individuals who directly or indirectly witness harassment, discrimination, or another form of violence happening to someone else) decision to intervene in events of harassment and discrimination at their workplace. The specific objectives of this study were to: (1) Understand the environment in which workplace harassment and discrimination occurs by analyzing the frequencies of individual events by type and location; (2) Assess contextual variables influencing bystander decisions through analyses of bystander interpretations of the event of harassment/discrimination and motivations for inaction/action; and (3) Contextualize bystander responses by understanding how the workplace environment and the bystander's assessment of power and identities of those involved interplay. The project used a survey design with quantitative data collected from employed adults in the United States (n=1,484) via Qualtrics online survey.

McMahon, Sarah. Extending Bystander Intervention Prevention Models from College Campuses to the Workplace, United States, 2022. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38659.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2016-MU-CX-K011)

None

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

2022
2022 (Summer)
  1. This project was conducted in collaboration with the Rutgers Violence Against Women Research Consortium (VAWRC). For more information on the Consortium project, please visit the VAWRC website.
Hide

The purpose of this project was to explore whether bystander intervention education models used to address interpersonal violence on college campuses can be modified to address workplace harassment.

Participants were recruited through the Qualtrics Panel service to complete a cross-sectional online survey. The survey was distributed in summer 2022. Upon survey completion, participants were compensated through a point/reward system used by Qualtrics.

Inclusion criteria were U.S. residence, current employment, and being at least 18 years old. Individuals were excluded if they were unable to consent or to understand English. Sampling quotas were used to ensure a diverse sample by race/ethnicity and income level. The final sample was 1,484 participants, with 1,309 complete observations.

Cross-sectional

Employed adults in the United States recruited via Qualtrics Research Panel Service.

Individual

Participants were asked if they had ever witnessed harassment and/or discrimination happening to another coworker in the past 12 months. For each type of incident, participants were asked to specify frequency of occurrence and where incidents took place (in-person, online, at a work-related event). Types of incidents included:

  • Disrespect
  • Disregard or being ignored
  • Hostility
  • Jokes at the victim's expense
  • Being sent offensive material
  • Unfair accusations of incompetence
  • Lower than deserved evaluations
  • Having promotion, networking, or mentorship opportunities withheld
  • Being subject to excessive monitoring
  • Given an unmanageable workload
  • Exclusion from activities
  • Having their work undermined or credit not attributed
  • Having their character unfairly questioned or judgment doubted

Participants were asked to consider one incident they witnessed over the past 12 months that impacted them the most and answered items on the type of incident that occurred, what they believed the victim's harassment/discrimination was based on, gender and work role of the transgressor, the participant's response, why they chose or did not choose to respond, and how the transgressor and victim each responded to the participant's intervention.

Demographic variables included age (year born), annual household income, race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, and education level. Items specific to employment included employment arrangement (full-time, part-time, contract, internship), hourly or salary status, length of time working for current employer, industry, and job satisfaction.

Not available.

Workplace Incivility Scale (Cortina et al., 2001), with supplemental items used in Cortina et al. (2013)

ARC3 Faculty/Staff Campus Climate Survey (ARC3, 2015)

Adaptations from the Michigan State University Know More campus climate survey

Hide

2023-10-12

2023-10-12 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

  • Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.

Hide

Not applicable.

Hide

Notes

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

  • ICPSR usually offers files in multiple formats for researchers to be able to access data and documentation in formats that work well within their needs. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR’s Accessibility Center.

NACJD logo

This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.