Fentanyl Risk Communication, Boston, Massachusetts, 2018-2019 (ICPSR 38161)
Version Date: Oct 11, 2021 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Christine M. Gunn, Boston Medical Center
Series:
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38161.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study uses qualitative interviews to describe experiences with and preferences for risk communication among three different groups: 1) People 18-25 years old who report using fentanyl, 2) those 35 years old and older who report using fentanyl, and 3) clinicians and community health workers in outpatient-based addiction treatment or harm reduction programs. Within each group, equal numbers of women and men were interviewed to explore age and gender differences in perceptions and preferences.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
This data collection may not be used for any purpose other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited. To protect respondent privacy, this data collection is restricted from general dissemination. To obtain this file, researchers must agree to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Data Use Agreement in accordance with existing ICPSR servicing policies.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
This study is part of the Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) Qualitative Data Sharing (QDS) project.
-
ICPSR has zipped the 31 interview transcripts into three qualitative data packages, separated by study sub-sample. These packages are available for restricted download. Please refer to the ICPSR README documents for more information.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of the study is to explore experiences of and preferences for communication related to fentanyl-related overdose risk among people who use fentanyl (PWUF) and health care providers who work in clinical outpatient settings or community health programs. The researchers were particularly interested in any gender and age cohort differences in risk communication preferences among PWUF and used a purposive sampling strategy to investigate.
Study Design View help for Study Design
The study used a single-site, cross-sectional design, collecting data with in-depth individual interviews. Interviews with people who use fentanyl were conducted in person and lasted between 40-60 minutes. Participants received $50 as compensation. Interviews with providers were conducted in person or by phone and lasted between 30-60 minutes. Providers received $75 compensation. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Themes covered in the interview guide were drawn from a risk communication framework. Guides were semi-structured and pilot tested with volunteer community health workers, research staff, and practicing clinicians prior to implementation.
A grounded analysis approach was used to identify major themes. The research team used NVivo to facilitate data management and analysis. Two research team members independently coded each transcript, relying on group consensus in case of discrepancies.
Sample View help for Sample
The researchers used a purposive sampling strategy to target three groups in the Boston area: people who use fentanyl (PWUF) aged 18 to 25, PWUF aged 35 and older, and health care providers in outpatient-based addiction treatment or community prevention programs. Additional inclusion criteria were having reported illicit fentanyl use within the last year and being an English speaker. Age groups were chosen using a purposive maximum variation approach while reflecting CDC age-based groupings. Balanced numbers of men and women were represented in each age group.
To recruit providers, the researchers emailed interview invitations. To recruit PWUF, the researchers posted flyers in community overdose prevention settings (e.g. syringe services), a large primary care clinic that provides office-based addiction treatment, and a substance use clinic providing services to young adults who use drugs. Providers also provided patient referrals.
The researchers anticipated enrolling 30 individuals in the study. However, as one cohort was closed to enrollment, an additional person was eligible and the researchers chose to enroll them. The final sample size was 31 total; 10 PWUF aged 18 to 25, 11 PWUF aged 35 and older, and 10 providers.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
People who use fentanyl: individuals a) ages 18-25 or 35 and older, English-speaking, and reported using fentanyl-containing opioids in the last 12 months, living in the Boston area.
Providers: any clinical or community provider treating people for addiction in an outpatient setting or a community program within the Boston area.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Interviews with people who use fentanyl covered fentanyl risk communication experiences (including emotional and behavioral impact of recommendations), preferences for overdose risk communications, current and preferred harm reduction practices, and concerns about overdose risk in relation to other concerns. Interviews with providers covered current communication practices about fentanyl and overdose risks, barriers/facilitators to effective communication, and strategies to improve fentanyl-related risk communication.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
In the subgroup of people who use fentanyl, 36 participants completed screening. Seven participants did not show for the interview, four did not meet sampling criteria, and four did not meet inclusion criteria. The final count was 21 participants in this group.
HideStudies related to this publication:
Studies related to this publication:
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.