A New Role for Technology? The Implementation and Impact of Video Visits in State Prisons, Washington, 2012-2015 (ICPSR 36843)
Version Date: Feb 27, 2020 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Leon Digard, The Vera Institute of Justice
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36843.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
Research shows that prison visitation is integral to the success of incarcerated people, reducing recidivism, facilitating reentry into the community, and promoting positive parent-child relationships. However, people are often incarcerated long distances from their home communities in areas that are difficult to reach by public transport, creating significant barriers to in-person visitation. Departments of corrections are exploring the use of computer-based video visits as a means to address some of the visitation needs of those in custody in a cost-effective way while continuing to encourage in-person visits. To learn more about this practice, the study team conducted the following research activities:
A survey of incarcerated people: The study team surveyed 211 people incarcerated in Washington State prisons about their use of video visits, their perceptions of the service, and their experiences of in-person visits more generally. This was a self-administered, pen-and-paper survey.
An impact evaluation of video visits: The study team analyzed individual-level administrative data from the Washington Department of Corrections (WADOC) and the private video visit vendor (JPay) to understand whether use of the service affected four outcomes: 1) the number of in-person visits people received, 2) the number of rule violations (of any severity) people committed in prison, 3) the number of general (ie. non-serious) rule violations they committed, and 4) the number of serious (as defined by WADOC) rule violations that were committed. The researchers used two analytic techniques: 1) a difference-in-difference test, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, and 2) Bayesian additive regression trees.
An analysis of in-person visit rates: The study team analyzed administrative data relating to all people who were incarcerated for the 12 month period ending November 2015 (n=11,524). The study team produced descriptive statistics and conducted negative binomial regressions to understand the rates of in-person visits and how these related to the characteristics of the incarcerated people.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
State
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
- For the full report and other resources based on this study, please visit http://www.vera.org/publications/closing-the-distance.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess the use of video visits by incarcerated people, the impact of video visits on in-person visit rates, and the impact of video visits on in-prison behavior in terms of number and severity of prison rules infractions.
Study Design View help for Study Design
The study utilizes a mixed-mode data collection. In November 2014, a random sample of incarcerated people in Washington state prisons completed self-administered, pen-and paper surveys about their experiences with video visits.
Researchers also compiled administrative data from the Washington Department of Corrections (WADOC) and JPay on in-prison behavior and video and in-person visits. Individual-level visit data are dated January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2015. One year cohort data are dated November 30, 2014 to November 30, 2015.
Sample View help for Sample
Survey participants were selected at random from a list of incarcerated people provided to researchers on the dates that they visited three different facilities.
For the administrative data, data pertaining to the full cohort of people held in WADOC custody at some point during the study period (2012-2015) were collected.
For the impact analysis of video visitation - researchers selected all people who had used the service with moderate frequency (averaging more than 1.5 video visits per year). Inverse-probability of treatment weighting was then used to select a control sample of non-service users.
For the study of in-person visitation rates, all people who were held in custody for the full year ending November 30, 2015, were included.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Adults incarcerated in Washington State prisons during the study period.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Not available.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
None
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2020-02-27
Version History View help for Version History
2020-02-27 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.
This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.