Stakeholder Views on Intellectual Disability Research Ethics, New York, 2013 (ICPSR 38311)

Version Date: Mar 30, 2022 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Katherine E. McDonald, Syracuse University

Series:

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38311.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant physical and mental health disparities. Ethical challenges may discourage their inclusion in research and hinder scientific advancements to reduce these health disparities. Five core groups are adults with ID, individuals who provide informal support to adults with ID, individuals who provide services to adults with ID, ID researchers, and Institutional Review Board (IRB) members. Little is known about these stakeholders' opinions on how to ethically include adults with ID in research. Increasing this knowledge base, especially by inviting input from groups whose opinions are rarely examined, is critical to helping the scientific community devise and deploy sensitive and responsive practices and encouraging research to reduce pressing disparities.

The research's long-term goal is to encourage science that is sensitive to the ethical and social dimensions of research with adults with ID and more inclusive of this population. The research's aim was to qualitatively study the views of adults with ID, persons who provide informal support to adults with ID, and persons who provide services to adults with ID on the participation of adults with ID in self-report research. The focus on self-report research that aims to study the thoughts and experiences of adults with intellectual disability reflects the field's increased emphasis on direct representation in such research and the less clear risks this research may bear.

McDonald, Katherine E. Stakeholder Views on Intellectual Disability Research Ethics, New York, 2013. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-03-30. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38311.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD075078)

This data collection may not be used for any purpose other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited. To protect respondent privacy, this data collection is restricted from general dissemination. To obtain this file, researchers must agree to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Data Use Agreement in accordance with existing ICPSR servicing policies.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

2013-07-01 -- 2013-11-24
2013-06-26 -- 2013-11-04
Hide

The research conducted focus groups with 57 adults from three different groups: adults with intellectual disability (n=24), people who provide social services to adults with intellectual disability (n=21), and family members and close friends of adults with intellectual disability (n=12). Adults with intellectual disability who did not have prior experience as an adult research participant were invited. Participants self-reported their disability and were from an array of circumstances including those with and without court-appointed guardians, those living independently in the community and in group homes, those with and without intimate partners, and those working and not working for pay, though most received SSI or SSDI.

Professionals who currently provide, or have in the past 12 months provided, social services to adults with intellectual disability, directly or through management roles (e.g., direct care providers, case managers, benefit coordinators, inclusion specialists, program directors, and executive directors), and family members and close friends of adults with intellectual disability who provided unpaid support to at least one adult with intellectual disability in the past 12 months were also invited. For all groups, all individuals were age 18 or older, had sufficient communication skills to make a decision and express their opinion (with or without accommodations), and who were in the greater Syracuse, NY (United States) area.

Longitudinal: Cohort / Event-based

Adults with intellectual disability, people who provide social services to adults with intellectual disability, and family members and close friends of adults with intellectual disability.

Individual

Participants were asked questions about community members' general views, as well as their views on research benefits, harms and safeguards, trust and respect, and major aspects of research participation.

Hide

2022-03-30

Hide

Notes

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

  • ICPSR usually offers files in multiple formats for researchers to be able to access data and documentation in formats that work well within their needs. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR’s Accessibility Center.

  • One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.

ICPSR logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.