Women in Prison in the 1990s: A Temporal and Institutional Comparison (ICPSR 31221)
Version Date: Oct 27, 2011 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Candace Kruttschnitt, University of Toronto;
Rosemary Gartner, University of Toronto
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31221.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
This study explores the attitudes, perceptions and experiences of women in two prisons in California. The study includes both a temporal component comparing women's experiences in one prison in the early 1960s and the mid-1990s, and a comparative institutional component, comparing women's experiences in two different prisons operating in the social and policy milieu of the mid-1990s. It analyzes surveys of inmates and secondary data collected from official records, archives, and an earlier study of women in prison in California. The study portrayed women's reactions to prison as a function of (1) inmates' pre-prison characteristics, (2) characteristics of inmates' prison careers, (3) institutional structures and processes, (4) crime control ideologies and policies, (5) public attitudes toward crime and criminals, and (6) women's roles, opportunities, and lifestyles in the wider society. Closed-ended questions were developed for the survey designed to measure (1) the most difficult aspects of doing time, (2) the specific problems of prison life, (3) the various types of inmates and inmate relations, and (4) the nature of inmate-staff relations. The survey also included questions based on measures and scales used in penology research and the survey initially administered by Ward and Kassebaum to women prisoners in the 1960s. Demographic questions included age, ethnicity, if born in the United States, length of residence in the United States, marital status, and education.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
prisons
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
A set of 70 interviews that were conducted with inmates are not publicly available.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
To preserve respondent confidentiality, the prison names have been removed from this release.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Survey made up of closed ended questions.
Sample View help for Sample
Surveys of the entire prison population excluding women in the secure housing units and mental health units. At Prison 1, 1,224 surveys were distributed by the principal investigators to the inmates and 940 were returned and usable; at Prison 2, 2500 surveys were left and distributed by the prison staff and 933 were returned in a usable format.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
The entire prison population of two prisons in California, excluding women in the secure housing units and mental health units.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
The data file contains variables that measure: opinions about the direction of laws, opinions about the effects of the three strikes law, any good that came from doing time, aspects of prison that are hard to adjust to, ways staff have helped prisoners, annoying aspects of doing time, inmates experiences and actions, ease of inmates getting items, ease of buying favors, toughness of punishment, sociodemographics, jobs held, and how Prison 1 changed over time.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Prison 1: 77 percent response rate. Prison 2: 37 percent response rate.
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2011-10-27
Version History View help for Version History
2018-02-15 The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. The previous citation was:
- Kruttschnitt, Candace, and Rosemary Gartner. Women in Prison in the 1990s: A Temporal and Institutional Comparison. ICPSR31221-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2011-10-27. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31221.v1
2011-10-27 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
- Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.
Notes
These data are freely available to data users at ICPSR member institutions. The curation and dissemination of this study are provided by the institutional members of ICPSR. How do I access ICPSR data if I am not at a member institution?
This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.