Understanding Arrest Data in the National Incident-based Reporting System (NIBRS), Massachusetts, 2011-2013 (ICPSR 36858)

Version Date: May 24, 2018 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Theodore Cross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36858.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.

This research examined the reliability of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) arrests data. Data on crime incidents, including data on whether an arrest was made or a summons issued, are collected from hundreds of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) across the country and then combined by the FBI into a national data set that is frequently used by researchers. This study compared arrest data in a sample of cases from NIBRS data files with arrest and summons data collected on the same cases directly from LEAs. The dataset consists of information collected from the Massachusetts NIBRS database combined with data from LEAs through a survey and includes data on arrests, summons, exceptional clearances, applicable statutes and offense names, arrest dates, and arrestees' sex, race, ethnicity and age for a sample of assault incidents between 2011 and 2013 from the NIBRS.

The collection contains one SPSS data file (n=480; 32 variables). Qualitative data are not available as part of this collection.

Cross, Theodore. Understanding Arrest Data in the National Incident-based Reporting System (NIBRS), Massachusetts, 2011-2013. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018-05-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36858.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2015-R2-CX-0047)

None

Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

2011 -- 2013
2011 -- 2013
  1. These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.

  2. Qualitative data are not available as part of this collection.

Hide

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of arrest data in the National Incident-Based Reporting System. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is one of the most important tools for understanding arrests in the United States. Hundreds of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) across the country enter data on crime incidents, including data on whether an arrest was made or a summons issued. These data are compiled by state law enforcement agencies and then combined by the FBI into a national data set that is frequently used by researchers. The present study compared arrest data in a sample of cases from NIBRS data files with arrest and summons data collected on the same cases directly from LEAs.

This project used Massachusetts NIBRS data maintained by the Crime Reporting Unit (CRU) of the Massachusetts State Police. A base dataset was extracted from the Massachusetts NIBRS MS-SQL-Server database into a SPSS flat file to serve as a sampling frame. This sampling frame dataset consisted of all assault incidents between the years of 2011 and 2013 of all NIBRS reports submitted to the Massachusetts State Police. The sample was limited to the crimes of aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation and sexual assault. Because different size LEAs and different offense types may have differed in the reliability of their NIBRS arrest data, a sample was created with equal numbers of cases from small, medium and large departments and equal numbers from each of the four offense types; 480 cases were sampled, 80 each in each combination of the four offense types by three LEA sizes. For each LEA represented in the sample, the research team created an individualized data collection form that listed all the department's cases in the sample, and included the department's Originating Agency Identification (ORI) and the incident-number and incident date for each case. The data collection form was mailed to each police chief with a letter requesting that the department complete the form and mail, fax or email it back. For each case listed, the LEA was asked to record whether or not there was an arrest or summons and whether there was an exceptional clearance. For arrests and summons, researchers also collected data on the applicable statute and offense name, the date of arrest, and arrestees' sex, race, ethnicity and age. The form also asked what record management system the department used.

This project used Massachusetts NIBRS data maintained by the Crime Reporting Unit (CRU) of the Massachusetts State Police. A base dataset was extracted from the Massachusetts NIBRS MS-SQL-Server database into a SPSS flat file to serve as a sampling frame. This sampling frame dataset consisted of all assault incidents between the years of 2011 and 2013 of all NIBRS reports submitted to the Massachusetts State Police. The sample was limited to the crimes of aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation and sexual assault. Because different size LEAs and different offense types may have differed in the reliability of their NIBRS arrest data, a sample was created with equal numbers of cases from small, medium and large departments and equal numbers from each of the four offense types; 480 cases were sampled, 80 each in each combination of the four offense types by three LEA sizes.

Cross-sectional

Arrests in Massachusetts, 2011-2013

Incident

National Incident-Based Reporting System

The data file, Understanding-Arrest-Data-in-NIBRS----archive-data-file---12-13-17.sav, includes 32 variables with a case count of 480. Variables include the date of the crime incident from NIBRS, the date of arrest from the law enforcement agency, arrestee demographics from the law enforcement agency, exceptional clearances from the law enforcement agency, exceptional clearances and clearance by arrests from NIBRS, counts of offenses, offenders, victims, and arrests in the incident from NIBRS, and counts of murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft and other assault offences in the incident from NIBRS.

80.6% of the police agencies represented in the case sample provided data.

None

Hide

2018-05-24

Hide

The weight variable Adjusted_weight corrects for oversampling of certain categories of LEA size and most serious incident offense in the stratified random sampling method used to construct the study sample.

Hide

Notes

  • These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

  • One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.