Tribal Justice, Tribal Court: Strengthening Tribal Justice Systems Using Restorative Approaches, South Dakota, 2022 (ICPSR 38825)
Version Date: Feb 13, 2024 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Lorinda Riley, University of Hawaii at Manoa
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38825.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
The purpose of this project was to develop a culturally relevant crime seriousness index specific to the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate (SWO) tribe while working closely with community partners. Informal background interviews with key stakeholders provided a foundation on traditional crime management by the community. These interviews informed the creation of an SWO-specific adaptation of the Sellin-Wolfgang crime seriousness index following an online survey conducted in 2022 with SWO community members (n=44 completed surveys).
Aggregated survey data have been released as a zipped package as it was received by ICPSR. Please refer to the study documentation for details on the index items and instructions on how to obtain the raw research data. The Final Report released by NIJ contains the full SRO crime seriousness index as Appendix D.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
None
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
In accordance with Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Tribal Code of Law Chapter 77, Title 4, Section 1, raw data will be housed at the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Research Office. To request access to this data contact: Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Research Office, P.O. Box 509, Agency Village, SD 57262 or call (605) 698-8411 for more information.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The original purpose of the project was to answer when and how restorative interventions are offered by tribal court judges, with the goal being to understand how communities perceive certain criminal actions and whether this impacts the use of restorative justice. The revised goal of the project was to develop a tribal-specific crime seriousness index, using the Sellin-Wolfgang index as a foundation.
Study Design View help for Study Design
The original research design for this project was a community-based participatory venture between the research team and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate (SWO) Tribal Court to create a culturally-appropriate crime seriousness matrix (developed internally by tribal court and government employees), apply it to a sampling of tribal court dispositions, and conduct a qualitative analysis to determine when restorative justice measures were applied by the court. However, due to external constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and tribe personnel changes, the design was reconceptualized to focus on creating the crime seriousness index and identifying divergences with the original Sellins-Wolfgang results.
To first determine the methods used to develop a crime seriousness index, the researchers conducted a scoping review of the existing literature. Following review and discussion with tribal legal scholars, the researchers developed a survey including the original 14 main events of the Sellin-Wolfgang study, modifying dollar amounts presented based on inflation and regional area and adding items specifying that the offender was intoxicated. Informal interviews with 2 tribal elders were also done to help inform the project and data interpretations. Interviews were not recorded or transcribed.
An online Qualtrics survey was administered to SWO citizens in June 2022 (n=44 completed). The survey was disseminated through SWO Tribal Council members and other research partners, who shared it with others in their district. Responses were aggregated as mean values for each index item. Based on the survey, an SWO-specific crime seriousness index was developed. Results were compared to the original Sellin-Wolfgang results using descriptive statistics.
Sample View help for Sample
A purposive sample of adult Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate citizens who, at the time of the study, resided on or had previously resided on the Lake Traverse Reservation were recruited and enrolled in the study.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate citizens.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Baseline items in the survey asked respondents to rate 1 to 10 (1=very little, 10=an expert) their level of knowledge of appropriate behavior in the past and the present according to tribal culture, and to choose what functions were more important within tribal court proceedings (e.g., getting to the truth vs. determining fault, punishing the offender vs. restoring the victim).
For crime seriousness items, respondents rated each item 1 to 10 (1=very minor, 10=very serious) a series of criminal events. Examples include theft, breaking and entering, vandalism, assault, reckless driving, rape, drug use, drug sales, making false statements, and truancy.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
Not available.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
Modified version of the Sellin-Wolfgang crime seriousness index (1964)
HideNotes
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
ICPSR usually offers files in multiple formats for researchers to be able to access data and documentation in formats that work well within their needs. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR’s Accessibility Center.
This dataset is maintained and distributed by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD), the criminal justice archive within ICPSR. NACJD is primarily sponsored by three agencies within the U.S. Department of Justice: the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.