Tanzania Abortion Incidence Study, 2012-2014 (ICPSR 38812)
Version Date: Jul 5, 2023 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Sarah C. Keogh, Guttmacher Institute
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38812.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
Unsafe abortions account for roughly 13 percent of maternal deaths worldwide. In addition, millions of women suffer nonfatal health consequences of unsafe abortion every year. Information on unsafe abortion can be instrumental in helping policy makers and program planners identify measures needed to improve maternal health. Insufficient information at the country level perpetuates the invisibility of the problem of unsafe abortion and results in governments giving it little priority in policy decisions, service delivery or program implementation.
This project was the first-ever national study of the incidence of induced abortion and health consequences of unsafe abortion in Tanzania. The three-year project aimed to:
- Provide evidence on the incidence of induced abortion in Tanzania, at the national and regional levels and by women's place of residence and economic status
- Document the incidence of abortion complications
- Document the methods and providers used to perform abortions in Tanzania
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
Region
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
- For additional information on this study, please visit the Guttmacher Institute website.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
To provide information to fill knowledge gaps and enable the Tanzanian government, international agencies, health professionals and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to deal more forthrightly with the abortion issue in order to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.
Study Design View help for Study Design
Heath Facilities Survey
A structured questionnaire was administered by an interviewer to the most qualified staff member or the person in charge of providing post-abortion care (PAC) in each facility, typically the chief of the Obstetrics and Gynecology department in larger facilities, and the facility head in health centers or dispensaries. Respondents were asked whether their facilities provide treatment for abortion complications (from both spontaneous and induced abortion), and if so, to estimate the number of PAC patients treated as outpatients and inpatients, in an average month and the past month. Specifying two time frames increases the likelihood of capturing variation from month to month. These two numbers were subsequently averaged and multiplied by 12 to produce an estimate for the 2013 calendar year.
Health Professionals Survey
The Health Professionals Survey interviewed a purposive sample of 202 experts knowledgeable about abortion provision in Tanzania. Forty-six percent were health professionals, including obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and nurses from the public and private sector, as well as a sizeable proportion of non-formally trained health workers such as community health workers, traditional birth attendants and traditional healers (15 percent of total sample). The remaining 54 percent of the sample was composed of researchers, reproductive health advocates, non-governmental organization (NGO) and women's groups' representatives, lawyers, journalists working on reproductive health issues, program managers and policy makers, community leaders, and youth leaders. Respondents were distributed equally between the 8 zones. Questionnaires sought information on the proportion of women who experience a complication from an induced abortion, and the proportion likely to receive care in a facility should they experience a complication, separately for rural and urban, poor and non-poor women.
Sample View help for Sample
Heath Facilities Survey
The sampling frame consisted of the Ministry of Health's most recent list of all health facilities (public and private) considered likely to provide post-abortion care (PAC). A separate list of all public and private facilities was obtained from the Zanzibar Ministry of Health. Facilities that did not provide primary care, that were specialized in non-reproductive services, or that otherwise lacked the capacity to provide PAC (as for some dispensaries), were excluded from the sampling frame. To ensure that the list was up to date, all district medical officers in the country were contacted to confirm that all health facilities in their district were included in the list, and to determine which facilities were equipped to provide PAC.
The final sampling frame of facilities likely to provide PAC included 952 facilities, of which 5 (0.5 percent) were consultant hospitals, 20 (2.1 percent) regional hospitals, 224 (23.6 percent) sub-regional hospitals (district hospitals or other hospitals), 526 (55.2 percent) health centers and 177 (18.6 percent) dispensaries. Although there were thousands of dispensaries in Tanzania, only 177 provided or were expected to provide PAC at the time the study was conducted. The nomenclature for facilities in Zanzibar is slightly different, with Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) being the equivalent of health centers, and Primary Health Care Units (PHCUs) being the equivalent of dispensaries. Within PHCUs, some provide only basic primary care services (PHCU), while others are equipped to provide a wider range of services including PAC (PHCU+). PHCCs and PHCU+ were combined with health centers and dispensaries respectively in the national level analyses.
Health Professionals Survey
The Health Professionals Survey interviewed a purposive sample of 202 experts knowledgeable about abortion provision in Tanzania. The sample was created through consultation with a broad network of colleagues engaged in research, policy, community and regional-level public health programs, which aimed to identify the individuals most knowledgeable about the provision of abortion at the national level, as well as in each zone. The experts came from a wide range of professions. Forty-six percent were health professionals, including obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and nurses from the public and private sector, as well as a sizeable proportion of non-formally trained health workers such as community health workers, traditional birth attendants and traditional healers (15 percent of total sample). The remaining 54 percent of the sample was composed of researchers, reproductive health advocates, non-governmental organization (NGO) and women's groups' representatives, lawyers, journalists working on reproductive health issues, program managers and policy makers, community leaders, and youth leaders. Respondents were distributed equally between the 8 zones. Particular effort was made to ensure that there was sufficient representation of experts with knowledge of rural areas. About 36 percent of respondents had worked at least 6 months in rural areas during the last 5 years.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
Health professionals and facilities that provide abortion and reproductive care in Tanzania.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Source View help for Data Source
Ministry of Health of Tanzania's most recent list of all health facilities (public and private) considered likely to provide post-abortion care (PAC) and a separate list of all public and private facilities from the Zanzibar Ministry of Health.
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Description of Variables View help for Description of Variables
Variables in the data pertain to the services that health facilities and professionals provide in the context of abortion care. Demographic variables present in the data include gender and age.
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
For the Health Facilities Survey, the sampling frame was stratified by facility level within each zone, to ensure that the estimates of abortion incidence were representative at both the national and zonal levels. Within each zone, 100 percent of consultant and regional hospitals, 66 percent of non-regional hospitals, 45 percent of health centers, and 44 percent of dispensaries equipped to offer PAC were selected, resulting in a total of 487 health facilities in the initial sample. Of these, 481 agreed to participate in the survey. To minimize refusals, letters from the Ministry of Health introducing and authorizing the study were sent to all facilities in advance of the fieldwork, and facility in-charges were contacted to inform them about the upcoming survey. Of the facilities that responded, 448 (93 percent) actually provided PAC services. Most health facilities in Tanzania are government owned, and this is reflected in the sample: only 26 percent of all facilities (mostly hospitals) were private or faith-based.
For the Health Professionals Survey, all 202 prospective respondents agreed to participate.
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2023-07-05
Version History View help for Version History
2023-07-05 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
- Performed consistency checks.
- Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.
Notes
These data are freely available to data users at ICPSR member institutions. The curation and dissemination of this study are provided by the institutional members of ICPSR. How do I access ICPSR data if I am not at a member institution?
