Search results

Showing 1 – 23 of 23 results.
Curated

2021-2022 Study of Family and Staff Experiences in AIAN Head Start FACES Programs (2021-2022 Study), United States (ICPSR 38965)

Released/updated on: 2026-04-07
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2021-08-01--2022-07-31

The 2021-2022 Study of Family and Staff Experiences in AIAN Head Start FACES Programs (2021-2022 Study) builds on the American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (AIAN FACES), which has been a source of national information on children and families enrolled in Head Start programs operated by federally recognized tribes (known as Region XI AIAN Head Start) since 2015. The motivation and goals of the Study of Family and Staff Experiences in AIAN FACES Programs (the 2021-2022 study) came from a need that arose as the COVID-19 pandemic continued into another year of affecting Region XI Head Start families' and staff's lives--and from recognizing the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on AIAN communities.

The 2021-2022 study included a nonrepresentative sample of Region XI Head Start programs and the children and families they serve. Although a nationally representative sample of Region XI Head Start programs, centers, teachers, and children were selected, fewer of them participated than expected, despite an extension of the planned parental consent collection and data collection windows.

Curated

2021-2022 Study of Family and Staff Well-Being in Head Start FACES Programs (2021-2022 Study), United States (ICPSR 38950)

Released/updated on: 2025-01-13
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2021-08-01--2022-07-31

The 2021-2022 Study of Family and Staff Well-Being in Head Start FACES Programs (2021-2022 study), builds on the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES), which has been a source of national information about Head Start programs and participants since 1997. The motivation and goals of the Study of Family and Staff Well-Being in Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey Programs (the 2021-2022 study) came from a need that arose as the COVID-19 pandemic continued into another year of affecting Head Start families' and staff's lives.

The 2021-2022 study included two components. Firstly, the Program, Staff, and Family Study, was conducted in 60 programs, and included the collection of parent surveys and Teacher Child Reports (TCRs) in fall 2021 and spring 2022, as well as a teacher survey in fall 2021. Secondly, the Program and Staff Study, conducted in the 60 programs participating in the Program, Staff, and Family Study plus an additional 120 programs, included the collection of program director, center director, and teacher surveys in spring 2022.

The 2021-2022 study aimed to describe the national population of Head Start programs, centers, teachers, classrooms, and children during the 2021-2022 program year. However, the Data Producers were unable to fully meet this goal because of challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationally representative sample of Head Start programs was selected. However, fewer of the programs participated than expected. Probability samples of centers, teachers, and children within the participating programs were selected. Weights are available for analysis to account for the probability that children and their teachers, centers, and programs were selected for the study. This lessens the risk of bias due to study non-participation and survey nonresponse; and provide results that represent, to the extent possible, all programs, centers, teachers, classrooms, and children in Head Start. The responding sample may not fully represent the population due to higher-than-expected non-response that may not have been adequately addressed with weighting adjustments.

Despite these limitations, the 2021-2022 study sample design supports many analyses for programs and teachers, as well as children. The data from the programs in the Program, Staff, and Family Study can address questions about the children and parents who participate in the program, including about children's development across one year in the Head Start program for both newly entering children and those returning for a second year. The study also supports research questions related to subgroups of interest, such as families with low income and specific racial/ethnic groups, as well as policy issues that emerge during the study. In addition, the research questions investigate the characteristics of Head Start programs, centers, and teachers, and the classrooms they teach. Users can use the same data to answer questions about the relationships between program and classroom characteristics and child and family well-being. The data from the larger sample of programs in the Program and Staff Study are most useful for answering questions about Head Start programs, classrooms, teachers, and program and center directors.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

ANES 2020 Time Series Study (ICPSR 38034)

Released/updated on: 2021-07-13
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2020-08-18--2020-11-03, 2020-11-03--2021-01-04

This study is part of the American National Election Study (ANES), a time-series collection of national surveys fielded continuously since 1948. The American National Election Studies are designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of public policy, and participation in political life. As with all Time Series studies conducted during years of presidential elections, respondents were interviewed during the two months preceding the November election (Pre-election interview), and then re-interviewed during the two months following the election (Post-election interview). Like its predecessors, the 2020 ANES was divided between questions necessary for tracking long-term trends and questions necessary to understand the particular political moment of 2020. The study maintains and extends the ANES time-series 'core' by collecting data on Americans' basic political beliefs, allegiances, and behaviors, which are so critical to a general understanding of politics that they are monitored at every election, no matter the nature of the specific campaign or the broader setting. This 2020 ANES study features a fresh cross-sectional sample, with respondents randomly assigned to one of three sequential mode groups: web only, mixed web (i.e., web and phone), and mixed video (i.e., video, web, and phone). The new content for the 2020 pre-election survey includes coronavirus pandemic, election integrity, corruption, impeachment, immigration and democratic norms. The pre-election survey also includes protests and unrest over policing and racism. The new content for the 2020 post-election survey includes voting experiences, anti-elitism, faith in experts or science, climate change, gun control, opioids, rural-urban identity, international trade, transgender military service, social media usage, misinformation, perceptions of foreign countries and group empathy. Phone and video interviews were conducted by trained interviewers using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) software on computers. Unlike in earlier years, the 2020 ANES did not use computer-assisted self interviewing (CASI) during any part of the interviewer-administered modes (video and phone). Rather, in interviewer-administered modes, all questions were read out loud to respondents, and respondents also provided their answers orally. Demographic variables include respondent age, education level, political affiliation, race/ethnicity, marital status, and family composition.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Canadian COVID-19 Response Survey of People with Disabilities and Health Conditions, 2020, 2021 (ICPSR 38875)

Released/updated on: 2023-10-16
Geographic coverage: Canada
Time period: 2020-06-11--2020-06-22, 2021-07-15--2021-07-31
The Canadian COVID-19 Response Survey of People with Disabilities and Health Conditions was administered to obtain a sample of people with disabilities and health conditions across 10 Canadian provinces and their views on government response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Curated

Civic Engagement and Volunteering Supplement 2019, 2021 (ICPSR 38866)

Released/updated on: 2023-06-23
The Civic Engagement and Volunteering Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) provides rich and comprehensive data on volunteering and other civic behaviors alongside demographics and socioeconomic characteristics for 50 states and 51 cities across the country. The CEV Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey in the United States that provides valuable insights into America's civic health and volunteerism over time. The data are collected via a national survey conducted in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and has been administered with the CPS core module every other September since 2017. (Prior to 2017, the measures included in the CEV supplement were represented by separate supplements: the volunteer supplement and the civic engagement supplement.) The September 2021 wave of data collection offers unique opportunities to examine the impacts of COVID-19 and policy interventions on America's civic health. For more information about the CPS volunteer supplement data available from ICPSR, see Current Population Survey Volunteer Supplement Series.
Curated

College and Beyond II (CBII) Alumni Survey, [United States], 2021 (ICPSR 38299)

Released/updated on: 2022-12-12
Geographic coverage: United States

The purpose of College and Beyond II (CBII) is to better understand how students' undergraduate experiences in and out of the classroom relate to their long-run development. The CBII Alumni Survey provides data collected from graduates ten years after earning their bachelor's degrees. It serves as the main source of information on students' long-run development for the study series. Domains covered by the CBII Alumni Survey include arts appreciation and engagement; health and well-being; labor market participation and wealth; civic engagement; beliefs about diversity and pluralism; and democratic participation. The survey also asks about respondents' recollections of their college experiences, as well as their current family structure, social identities, educational attainment, experiences with discrimination, and political and religious identification. The survey contains scales that are widely used in various disciplines such as education, economics, political science, and psychology.

The CBII Alumni Survey data can be linked to other studies in the CBII series using the ID_PERSON anonymized student identifier. These CBII studies provide information about respondents' academic backgrounds, undergraduate course transcripts, descriptions of courses taken, and postsecondary enrollment and degree attainment. Contextual data about respondents' neighborhoods can be linked to the National Neighborhood Data Archive using current zip codes, and contextual data about the colleges respondents applied to can be linked to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System using U.S. Department of Education UNITID identifiers.

Self-published

Data and Programming for "Does School Funding Matter In a Pandemic? COVID-19 Instructional Models and School Funding Adequacy" (ICPSR 220523)

Released/updated on: 2025-02-23
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2018-08-01--2022-07-01
Data and Programming for "Does School Funding Matter In a Pandemic? COVID-19 Instructional Models and School Funding Adequacy"Abstract: The factors that influenced school districts’ decisions to offer virtual, hybrid, or in-person instruction during the 2020-21 school year­—the first full school year after the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic—have been the focus of a large body of research in recent years. Some of this research examines the influence of school spending, among other factors; however, these studies do not consider spending in relation to cost, “cost” being the amount needed for a school district to achieve a given outcome. This paper uses a measure of adequacy, which is the amount of spending under or over estimated cost, to determine whether spending correlates with the amount of time a school district offered virtual instruction. We find spending adequacy significantly and substantially predicts time spent in virtual instruction: for every $1,000 positive change in adequacy (closing a gap and/or adding to a surplus), the time spent in virtual schooling decreases 0.9 percentage points. A one standard deviation positive change in adequacy, therefore, results in 12.8 fewer days of virtual instruction. While our findings are descriptive, they do require future researchers to consider school spending adequacy, as much as any other factor, as a predictor of pandemic instructional models.
Curated
Partially restricted
Simple Crosstabs

Detroit Metro Area Communities Study (DMACS) Wave 14, Michigan, 2021 (ICPSR 38970)

Released/updated on: 2025-03-31
Geographic coverage: Detroit, United States, Michigan
Time period: 2021-11-03--2021-12-15

The Detroit Metro Area Communities Study (DMACS) is a panel survey of Detroit residents aged 18 and older. The original panel of respondents was drawn from an address-based probability sample of all occupied Detroit households in 2016 and has since been refreshed through additional address-based sampling annually. Between November 3 and December 15, 2021, 2,662 previously-enrolled panelists were invited to participate in a self-administered online or interviewer-administered telephone survey. A total of 1,900 Detroit residents completed the survey, yielding an overall response rate of 72% (using AAPOR Response Rate 1).

Topics include experience with COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccine receipt, attitudes and trust; employment and economic precarity; neighborhood satisfaction; neighborhood change; as well as healthcare usage; the Child Tax Credit; and Digital Inclusion.

Self-published

ECIN Replication Package for "Lockdown drinking: The sobering effect of price controls in a pandemic" (ICPSR 199482)

Released/updated on: 2024-03-31
Geographic coverage: United Kingdom
Time period: 2018-09-03--2020-08-24
Lockdown restrictions reduce the spread of COVID-19 but disrupt livelihoods and lifestyles that can induce harmful behavior changes, including problematic lockdown drinking fueled by cheap alcohol.  Exploiting differences amongst the four constituent countries of the United Kingdom, we use triple difference analysis on alcohol retail sales to examine the efficacy of minimum unit pricing as a price control device to help curb excessive consumption in a pandemic setting.  We find the policy is remarkably effective and well-targeted in reducing demand for cheap alcohol, with minimal spillover effects, and consumers overall buying and spending less
Self-published

ECIN Replication Package for "Optimal Lockdowns Under Constraints" (ICPSR 208347)

Released/updated on: 2024-10-02
Geographic coverage: United States
This package replicates the findings in "Optimal Lockdown Under Constraints."It includes an empirical folder and an optimization folder. Please read the README.txt for further information. 
Self-published

ECIN Replication Package for "Pandemic exposure and long-run psychological well-being" (ICPSR 187781)

Released/updated on: 2023-08-02
Geographic coverage: China
Time period: 2003-01-01--2018-01-01
Using individuals’ life history information from a large-scale national survey (N = 12,601), we causally evaluate how exposure to SARS-Cov-1, the first global pandemic in the 21st century, affects long-term psychological well-being. We find that exposure to local pandemic risk, i.e., local deaths due to the pandemic, significantly reduced people’s mental health 12 years later. Consistent with the belief-based account of depression, exposure to pandemic risk resulted in more pessimistic beliefs about the future and survival probability. People reduced savings and increased hedonic consumption, suggesting a “carpe diem” effect of the pandemic exposure.
Self-published

National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Essential Businesses in Census Tracts or ZIP Code Tabulation Areas, United States, 2020 (ICPSR 301419)

Released/updated on: 2026-01-12
Geographic coverage: United States, U.S. Outlying Islands
Time period: 2020-01-01--2020-01-01

This dataset contains measures of the number and density of businesses and their employees deemed essential in the first year (2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic by the US Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in versions 3.0 (April 17, 2020) and 4.0 (August 18, 2020) of their advisory guidance on the essential critical infrastructure workforce. Measures are provided for 2020 per United States Census Tract or ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA). This 2020 dataset includes four separate files for four different geographic areas (GIS shapefiles from the United States Census Bureau). The four geographies include:

  • Census Tract 2010
  • Census Tract 2020
  • ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) 2010
  • ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) 2020

Information about which dataset to use can be found in the Usage Notes section of the data documentation.

Curated

National Survey of COVID-19 Impact on United States Museums, 2020 (ICPSR 37980)

Released/updated on: 2021-02-09
Geographic coverage: United States
On June 8, 2020, the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) launched a survey designed to capture a snapshot of the state of US museums during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. By the time the survey closed on June 30, directors of 760 museums of all types and sizes had reported on their plans for reopening, the projected financial impact of the pandemic, and the services they were providing to their communities. The American Alliance of Museums (AAM) has been bringing museums together since 1906, helping to develop standards and best practices, gathering and sharing knowledge, and providing advocacy on issues of concern to the entire museum community. Representing more than 35,000 individual museum professionals and volunteers, institutions, and corporate partners serving the museum field, the Alliance stands for the broad scope of the museum community. For more information, visit www.aam-us.org.
Curated

Pandemic Economics: The 1918 Influenza and Its Modern-Day Implications (ICPSR 22680)

Released/updated on: 2008-06-09
Geographic coverage: United States
Many predictions of the economic and social costs of a modern-day pandemic are based on the effects of the influenza pandemic of 1918. Despite killing 675,000 people in the United States and 40 million worldwide, the influenza of 1918 has been nearly forgotten. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the influenza pandemic of 1918 in the United States, its economic effects, and its implications for a modern-day pandemic. The paper provides a brief historical background as well as detailed influenza mortality statistics for cities and states, including those in the Eighth Federal Reserve District, that account for differences in race, income, and place of residence. Information is obtained from two sources: (i) newspaper articles published during the pandemic and (ii) a survey of economic research on the subject.
Curated
Partially restricted
Simple Crosstabs

Portrait of New York State Artists Survey, 2022 (ICPSR 39025)

Released/updated on: 2025-05-15
Geographic coverage: New York (state)
Time period: 2020-03-01--2022-02-01

Creatives Rebuild New York (CRNY) launched the "Portrait of New York State Artists" survey in February 2022 to build a portrait of the needs, circumstances, and experiences of artists across New York State. CRNY used data from this survey to conduct advocacy and narrative change work, and to assess whether the funding provided to artists through CRNY's programs helped meet the needs of individual artists in any substantive or transformational ways.

Upon submission of an application to CRNY's Guaranteed Income for Artists or Artist Employment Program, artists were invited to answer additional optional questions about their artistic practice, financial circumstances, well-being, pandemic experience, and attitudes about policy and advocacy matters. A publicly accessible version of the survey was made available for those not interested or eligible to apply for CRNY funding. The survey closed on May 31, 2022.

Overall, 13,377 artists completed the survey.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Mindset Intervention for Depression and Immune Dysregulation, United States, 2022-2023 (ICPSR 39316)

Released/updated on: 2026-01-15
Geographic coverage: United States
People who live through large-scale societal catastrophes such as the COVID-19 pandemic are at a heightened risk of mental illness in the years afterward, but can also experience positive changes in their sense of meaning, personal relationships, and self-esteem, among other domains. The researchers propose that differences in these mental health trajectories may be partially influenced by individuals' mindsets about the long-term effects of living through catastrophes. To test this possibility, the researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial of a brief, psychologically-wise intervention designed to promote the mindset that "catastrophes can be opportunities in the long-term." A sample of 548 adults were randomized to either the mindset intervention condition or a control task.
Self-published

Replication data for "Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu" (ICPSR 179061)

Released/updated on: 2022-09-01
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1917-01-01--1920-01-01
This is the replication package for the paper "Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu".It contains the input data as well as all the required Stata code.Please see the README.PDF file for replication instructions.
Self-published

The Shapes of the Fourth Estate During the Pandemic: Profiling COVID-19 News Consumption in Eight Countries (ICPSR 300528)

Released/updated on: 2025-12-22
Geographic coverage: Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, France, Türkiye, Germany, Spain
Time period: 2020-03-01--2020-11-01

COVID2020 dataset provides a new, high-volume COVID-19 tweet dataset. It was collected from March 2020 to November 2020, covering eight months in the first year of the pandemic. The list of tracked COVID-19 keywords is obtained from "Emily Chen, Kristina Lerman, and Emilio Ferrara. 2020. Tracking Social Media Discourse about the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (2020)". Those keywords include not only generic terms such as "corona virus", "covid", but also non-pharmaceutical interventions such as "lockdown", "n95", and "social distancing."

This dataset is comprised of tweet IDs.

Curated

Small Business Pulse Survey (SBPS): Tracking Changes During The Coronavirus Pandemic (ICPSR 37868)

Released/updated on: 2020-11-11
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2020-04-01--2020-06-01, 2020-08-01--2020-10-01, 2020-11-01--2021-01-01

The Small Business Pulse Survey (Business Pulse) measures the effect of changing business conditions during the Coronavirus pandemic on our nation's small businesses. Small businesses are nonfarm, single-location employer businesses with 1-499 employees and receipts of $1,000 or more in the 50 states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

Business Pulse complements existing U.S. Census Bureau data collections by providing high-frequency, detailed information on the challenges small businesses are facing during the Coronavirus pandemic as well as their participation in federal programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program.

The survey includes information about small business operations and finances, requests and receipt of assistance, and measures of overall well-being and expectations for recovery. Data are available for states and large metropolitan areas, and by sector, including sector 71 (arts, entertainment, and recreation), which includes performing arts companies, museums, spectator sports, and amusement industries.

Survey results give local, state, and federal officials essential real-time data to aid in policy and decision-making. In addition, the information may aid businesses in making economic decisions and assist researchers studying the effects of the pandemic.

Curated
Partially restricted

Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior, July 2020 (ICPSR 38959)

Released/updated on: 2024-01-17
Geographic coverage: United States

The Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior series (also known as the Surveys of Consumers) was undertaken to measure changes in consumer attitudes and expectations, to understand why such changes occur, and to evaluate how they relate to consumer decisions to save, borrow, or make discretionary purchases. The data regularly include the Index of Consumer Sentiment, the Index of Current Economic Conditions, and the Index of Consumer Expectations. Since the 1940s, these surveys have been produced quarterly through 1977 and monthly thereafter.

The surveys conducted in 2020 focused on topics such as evaluations and expectations about personal finances, employment, price changes, and the national business situation. Opinions were collected regarding respondents' appraisals of present market conditions for purchasing houses, automobiles, computers, and other durables.

Also explored in this survey, were respondents' political affiliation, the corona virus, and the election. Demographic information includes ethnic origin, sex, age, marital status, and education.

Self-published

Swimming In The Deep End: School Board Members Making Sense Of Their Roles And Responsibilities (ICPSR 211042)

Released/updated on: 2024-11-14
Little has been dedicated to the experience and potential support for local educational policy actors, school board members, that were at the heart of unprecedented decision and sensemaking during the Covid-19 pandemic. Employing sensemaking theory and an interpretivist case study design, this study conducts interviews with four school board members in a Missouri school district. The study explores their motivations for candidacy and perceptions of the role's responsibilities, especially as individuals elected during the pandemic. The findings highlight that candidates' decisions to run are influenced by personal and professional experiences, shaping their initial understanding of the position. However, post-election, a transformative process unfolds in the actual enactment of the role, signifying an evolution in their sensemaking journey. This study contributes to the limited but growing literature on school board members who play critical roles in education and whose roles and responsibilities have often been overlooked in the scholarship.