Search results

Showing 1 – 2 of 2 results.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Alcohol Outlet Data, Genesee County, Michigan, 2001, 2011-2012 & 2016 (ICPSR 36963)

Released/updated on: 2018-05-31
Geographic coverage: United States, Genesee County, Michigan
Time period: 2011-01-01--2012-01-01
The data collection is comprised of geocoded alcohol outlet data for Genesee County, Michigan. Licensee lists were downloaded from the State of Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Liquor Control Commission website in 2012 and 2017. The addresses contained in the licensee lists were geocoded to create geocoded latitude and longitude variables as well as Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projections of latitude and longitude. Additionally, based on the license type definitions, an outlet type variable was created that categorizes the outlet type as package, on-premises/bar, or both.
Curated
Restricted

Effectiveness of Peer Navigation to Link Released HIV-Positive Jail Inmates to HIV Care (LINK LA), Los Angeles, California, 2012-2016 (ICPSR 39789)

Released/updated on: 2026-06-02
Geographic coverage: United States, Los Angeles, California
Time period: 2012-01-01--2016-01-01

This study is part of the Seek, Test, Treat and Retain (STTR) Collaboration Project that involved over twenty studies in the fields of HIV and drug abuse. All studies were independently developed, but were chosen for the collaboration because they focused on one or more steps of the HIV treatment cascade: Seek, Test, Treat and Retain. As part of STTR Collaboration Project, the studies were grouped into Criminal Justice-related studies and Vulnerable Population-related studies. The data collected by these studies included twelve common domains (e.g., Demographic characteristics, Mental Health) in each of which a shared questionnaire or instrument was taken up by the studies and adapted to fit the study.

This study was a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of a peer-based health system navigation intervention among individuals assigned to the intervention group compared with those assigned to the control group (usual care transitional management services). Baseline interviews were conducted during incarceration while the follow-up interviews were conducted at months 2, 6 and 12 following release from jail to the community. For participants who were re-incarcerated during, interviews were conducted in the jail setting to ensure high study retention. The goal was to improve engagement and retention in HIV care.