Showing 1 – 3 of 3 results.
Curated
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS): Targeted Intervention Components (TIC) for Correctional Re-Entry Programs, 2002-2008 [United States] (ICPSR 27961)
Released/updated on: 2010-09-29
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2002-01-01--2008-12-31, 2008-01-01--2008-12-31
Targeted Intervention Components (TIC) for Correctional Re-Entry Programs is three-year study with the established guidelines and resources for an evidence-based library of targeted treatment intervention components for outpatient (e.g., crimes of moderate severity) re-entry correctional programs. It involves no-fee, user-friendly, and manual-guided techniques that can be integrated with programmatic assessments of client needs and progress. The TIC study, under Texas Christian University's (TCU) leadership, involved developing and testing a series of brief (4-session), flexible, evidence-based treatment interventions targeting specific offender problems. These interventions employed a user-friendly modular format that does not require extensive staff training, and the modules themselves are intended to serve either as stand-alone interventions or as components of a comprehensive treatment program. The initial modules are currently being developed and tested in prison-based treatment settings. A series of field trials test and validate each of these specialized therapeutic modules for use with community-based correctional populations. The TCU developed a treatment model which provided conceptual and scientific foundations for the use of targeted interventions that addressed discretely client problems. Study questionnaires assessed client responses that were related to such topics as: treatment readiness and motivation, anger and hostility, criminal thinking, risky behaviors for HIV/AIDS/Hepatitis C, communication, and other social skill deficits. The TCU's Criminal Justice Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment (CJ-CEST) was implemented as the core "needs and engagement" assessment instrument.
Curated
Restricted
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use] (ICPSR 28921)
Released/updated on: 2014-03-24
Geographic coverage: North Carolina, Vermont, Indiana, United States, Wyoming, Tennessee, Maine, Arkansas, Washington, West Virginia, Colorado, Missouri, Guam, Arizona, Nevada, Rhode Island, Montana, Kentucky, Florida, Michigan, New Mexico, Illinois, Texas, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Palau
Time period: 2005-08-01--2007-09-30, 2006-12-14--2007-08-14, 2008-09-15--2009-06-30, 2008-10-15--2009-06-15, 2006-07-01--2006-09-30, 2005-12-01--2007-12-31, 2008-01-01--2008-06-30, 2008-07-01--2008-12-31, 2009-01-01--2009-06-30, 2009-07-01--2009-12-31, 2010-01-01--2010-06-30, 2005-12-01--2007-12-31, 2008-01-01--2008-06-30, 2008-07-01--2008-12-31, 2009-01-01--2009-06-30, 2009-07-01--2009-12-31, 2010-01-01--2010-06-30, 2005-12-01--2007-12-31, 2008-01-01--2008-06-30, 2008-07-01--2008-12-31, 2009-01-01--2009-06-30, 2009-07-01--2009-12-31, 2010-01-01--2010-06-30
The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project. Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels. These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables.
Curated
Substance Abuse Treatment Cost Allocation and Analysis Template (SATCAAT) Study, 1992-1994: [United States] (ICPSR 3401)
Released/updated on: 2008-08-26
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1992-01-01--1994-12-31
The Substance Abuse Treatment Cost Allocation and Analysis
Template (SATCAAT) is a unit cost protocol based on rigorous cost
accounting methods and standards for collecting substance abuse
treatment cost data. This protocol provides a uniform accounting
system for treatment providers that ultimately translates costs by
category into costs by unit of service. Each treatment provider may
include up to eight service delivery units (SDUs), which are defined
as a single treatment modality delivered at a single geographic
site. Data are entered into a series of spreadsheets within the
template, beginning with the conversion of the provider's financial
accounting reports into the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment's
(CSAT's) chart of accounts structure and continuing through the
allocation of costs using a step-down method of cost allocation. The
allocation of costs will produce a "cost profile" of average cost per
client by unit of service for each SDU. This data collection includes
data from a purposive sample. These data are useful for examining
patterns of service unit costs across the sampled SDUs. However,
generalization to other providers or provider types is not
possible. This release includes two files: (1) the SDU summary file
for residential women and children (RWC) (78 records), and (2) cost
data for all SDUS (213 records). The SDU summary file for RWC includes
four SDU types: (1) residential pregnant and postpartum women, (2)
residential long-term pregnant and postpartum women, (3) residential
short-term pregnant and postpartum women, and (4) residential women
and children. The SATCAAT Study includes data for multiple years for
some SDUs. Each year of data for each SDU constitutes one
record. SATCAAT captures costs for 14 different services: initial
assessment, medical exams, project evaluation, psychosocial
evaluation, individual counseling, group counseling, HIV testing and
counseling, medical and diagnostic services, housing and meals,
clinical case management, networking and outreach, client
transportation, client education, and staff education. The focus of
the SDUs in the cost data file were (1) Aftercare, (2) Children, (3)
Detox, (4) HIV, (5) Outpatient, (6) Residential, and (7) Women. This
file includes 27 different SDU types based on the service delivery
design of the sampled treatment providers (e.g., aftercare -- women
only, outpatient aftercare -- adult, outpatient aftercare --
adolescent).