Developing a Taxonomy To Understand and Measure Outcomes of Success in Community-Based Elder Mistreatment Interventions, New York City, New York, 2018-2019 (ICPSR 37955)
Research tools available to help advance knowledge of effective community-based elder mistreatment (EM) interventions are limited. The field lacks an understanding of what success means in EM response program (EMRP) interventions, which work directly with victims to reduce the risk of re-victimization. Without establishing indicators of EMRP success, it is not possible to develop valid intervention outcome measures to compare different EMRP models toward the development of evidence-based practice. Informed by the EMRP practice principle of older adult self-determination, this study developed a victim-centric taxonomy of case outcomes that indicate EMRP success.
This study drew on two sources of data, including interviews with EM victims and a scoping review to inform taxonomy development. Prioritizing the perspective of victims, this study conducted interviews with 27 victims involved in EMRP services who vary in EM subtype, gender, and race/ethnicity.
The taxonomy of successful EMRP outcomes will serve as important research infrastructure to support the development of EMRP intervention outcome measurement in future research.
Documentation of Resident to Resident Elder Mistreatment in Residential Care Facilities, New York City, 2009-2013 (ICPSR 35649)
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.
The purpose of this study was to investigate violence and aggression committed by nursing home residents that is directed toward other residents, referred to here as resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (R-REM). Resident-to-resident mistreatment (R-REM) was defined as: negative and aggressive physical, sexual, or verbal interactions between long term care residents, that in a community setting would likely be construed as unwelcome and have high potential to cause physical or psychological distress in the recipient.
The goals of this project were to: enhance institutional recognition of R-REM; examine the convergence of R-REM reports across different methodologies; identify the most accurate mechanism for detecting and reporting R-REM; develop profiles of persons involved with R-REM by reporting source; investigate existing R-REM policies, and; develop institutional guidelines for reporting R-REM episodes. Also, the project team sought to answer the following research questions: (1) Will the reporting of R-REM differ by source? (2) Which reporting methods will show the highest level of convergence and accuracy in reporting? (3) What resident characteristics or profiles will predict R-REM across the differing reporting sources? (4) What are the existing guidelines and/or institutional policies for reporting R-REM? To achieve these goals, the researcher conducted this study over a two week period in five urban and five suburban New York City facilities. Resident-to-resident abuse information was derived from five sources: (1) resident interviews (2) staff informants (3) observational data (behavior sheets) (4) resident chart reviews (5) incident and accident reports.
Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences? (ICPSR 25701)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1973 (ICPSR 9192)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1975 (ICPSR 9193)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1976 (ICPSR 9194)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1977 (ICPSR 8046)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1978 (ICPSR 8047)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1979 (ICPSR 8048)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1980 (ICPSR 8385)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1980: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 9174)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1981 (ICPSR 8386)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1981: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 9175)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1985 (ICPSR 8902)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1985: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 9096)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1989 (ICPSR 9830)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1989: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 6498)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1990 (ICPSR 9831)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1990: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 6298)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1991 (ICPSR 6430)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1991: Drug Mentions (ICPSR 6431)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1992 (ICPSR 6528)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1993 (ICPSR 6725)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1994 (ICPSR 6825)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1995 (ICPSR 2354)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1996 (ICPSR 2355)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1997 (ICPSR 2690)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1998 (ICPSR 2915)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1999 (ICPSR 3159)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2000 (ICPSR 3452)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2001 (ICPSR 3816)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2002 (ICPSR 21861)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2003 (ICPSR 21822)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2004 (ICPSR 21821)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2005 (ICPSR 21560)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2006 (ICPSR 28403)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2007 (ICPSR 28521)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2008 (ICPSR 29921)
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2009 (ICPSR 31482)
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2000 (ICPSR 25501)
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2001-2002 (ICPSR 25502)
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2003-2004 (ICPSR 25503)
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) is a program of studies designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. The NHANES combines personal interviews and physical examinations, which focus on different population groups or health topics. These surveys have been conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) on a periodic basis from 1971 to 1994. In 1999 the NHANES became a continuous program with a changing focus on a variety of health and nutrition measurements which were designed to meet current and emerging concerns. The surveys examine a nationally representative sample of approximately 5,000 persons each year. These persons are located in counties across the United States, 15 of which are visited each year.
For NHANES 2003-2004, there were 12,761 persons selected for the sample, 10,122 of those were interviewed (79.3 percent) and 9,643 (75.6 percent) were examined in the mobile examination centers (MEC). Many of the NHANES 2003-2004 questions were also asked in NHANES II 1976-1980, Hispanic HANES 1982-1984, NHANES III 1988-1994, and NHANES 1999-2002. New questions were added to the survey based on recommendations from survey collaborators, NCHS staff, and other interagency work groups. As in past health examination surveys, data were collected on the prevalence of chronic conditions in the population. Estimates for previously undiagnosed conditions, as well as those known to and reported by survey respondents, are produced through the survey. Risk factors, those aspects of a person's lifestyle, constitution, heredity, or environment that may increase the chances of developing a certain disease or condition, were examined. Data on smoking, alcohol consumption, sexual practices, drug use, physical fitness and activity, weight, and dietary intake were collected. Information on certain aspects of reproductive health, such as use of oral contraceptives and breastfeeding practices, were also collected. The diseases, medical conditions, and health indicators that were studied include: anemia, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and lower extremity disease, environmental exposures, equilibrium, hearing loss, infectious diseases and immunization, kidney disease, mental health and cognitive functioning, nutrition, obesity, oral health, osteoporosis, physical fitness and physical functioning, reproductive history and sexual behavior, respiratory disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema), sexually transmitted diseases, skin diseases, and vision. The sample for the survey was selected to represent the United States population of all ages. Special emphasis in the 2003-2004 NHANES was on adolescent health and the health of older Americans. To produce reliable statistics for these groups, adolescents aged 15-19 years and persons aged 60 years and older were over-sampled for the survey. African Americans and Mexican Americans were also over-sampled to enable accurate estimates for these groups. Several important areas in adolescent health, including nutrition and fitness and other aspects of growth and development, were addressed. Since the United States has experienced dramatic growth in the number of older people during the twentieth century, the aging population has major implications for health care needs, public policy, and research priorities. NCHS is working with public health agencies to increase the knowledge of the health status of older Americans. NHANES has a primary role in this endeavor. In the examination, all participants visit the physician who takes their pulse or blood pressure. Dietary interviews and body measurements are included for everyone. All but the very young have a blood sample taken and see the dentist. Depending upon the age of the participant, the rest of the examination includes tests and procedures to assess the various aspects of health listed above. Usually, the older the individual, the more extensive the examination. Some persons who are unable or unwilling to come to the examination center may be given a less extensive examination in their homes.
Demographic data file variables are grouped into three broad categories: (1) Status Variables: provide core information on the survey participant. Examples of the core variables include interview status, examination status, and sequence number. (Sequence number is a unique ID assigned to each sample person and is required to match the information on this demographic file to the rest of the NHANES 2003-2004 data). (2) Recoded Demographic Variables: these variables include age (age in months for persons through age 19 years, 11 months; age in years for 1- to 84-year-olds, and a top-coded age group of 85 years of age and older), gender, a race/ethnicity variable, current or highest grade of education completed, (less than high school, high school, and more than high school education), country of birth (United States, Mexico, or other foreign born), Poverty Income Ratio (PIR), income, and a pregnancy status variable (adjudicated from various pregnancy related variables). Some of the groupings were made due to limited sample sizes for the two-year data set. (3) Interview and Examination Sample Weight Variables: sample weights are available for analyzing NHANES 2003-2004 data. For a complete listing of survey contents for all years of the NHANES see the document -- Survey Content -- NHANES 1999-2010.