Evaluation of Success for All PowerTeaching in Middle School Grades, United States, 2012-2016 (ICPSR 37046)
Version Date: Apr 17, 2018 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Jean B. Grossman, Princeton University/MDRC
Series:
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37046.v1
Version V1 (see more versions)
You are viewing an older version of this study. A newer version is available (view all versions)
Additional details may be in the Version History or Data Collection Notes fields of the study metadata.
Summary View help for Summary
From 2012 through 2016, MDRC, a non-profit research organization, conducted an evaluation of the scale-up effort of Success for All PowerTeaching in middle school math. PowerTeaching, a structured cooperative learning program, was designed to do just that. The study was funded by an Investing in Innovation (i3) fund from the U.S. Department of Education. The expansion of PowerTeaching through an i3 grant offers the education field a unique opportunity to learn what it takes to help teachers create cooperative learning environments in their classrooms.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
These data are being released in BETA version to facilitate early access to the study for research purposes. This collection has not been fully processed by ICPSR at this time; the original materials provided by the principal investigator were minimally processed and converted to other file types for ease of use. As the study is further processed and given enhanced features by ICPSR, users will be able to access the updated versions of the study. Please report any data errors or problems to user support and we will work with you to resolve any data related issues.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The Success for All PowerTeaching scale-up evaluation examines PowertTeaching implementation and impacts in five school districts over a two-year period (the 2014-2015 school year through the 2015-2016 school year). It also considers the scale-up process itself -- the methods employed and the extent to which the Success for All Foundation (SFAF), the organization that developed and provides technical assistance to schools operating the program, achieved its scale-up goals.
Study Design View help for Study Design
SFAF developed the PowerTeaching model used in the i3 scale-up evaluation based on over 25 years of extensive research and refinement of the model. The model aims to prepare students to meet the stringent demands of new state math standards, both the knowledge standards and the 21st-century skills standards, such as communication and collaboration. Its components are intended to provide teachers with the necessary tools to incorporate cooperative learning strategies into their instructional practices. In particular, the PT model requires that teachers place students in longstanding heterogeneous skill groups and provide them with structured opportunities to practice the three key elements of cooperative learning teams:
- Team recognition -- students embrace team identity and care about the team's performance.
- Equal opportunities for all students to help the team - all team members, no matter their ability, can contribute to the team goals by improving on their past performance.
- Team interdependence - team success depends on each individual's learning, while an individual's grade depends only on his or her own performance
The recruitment for the evaluation occurred as part of the general outreach to schools, districts, and states for the i3 scale-up grant. Each school had to meet the following eligibility criteria: serve students in Grades 6 through 8, eligible for Title I status, willing to comply with the study's data request, and at least 75 percent of its teachers had to vote to adopt the PTi3 program.
To be recruited, scale-up schools had to serve a large fraction (more than 50 percent) of minority students or students who were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch in Grades 6 through 8. Compared with the scale-up sample, the study schools had a similar proportion of students eligible for free and reduced-price lunch and were equally likely to be designated Title I schools.
Sample View help for Sample
At the end of the recruitment phase, five school districts in four states agreed to participate in the study. The number of study schools provided by each district ranged between 4 and 24, producing a total sample of 58 schools. Of these 58 schools, 24 schools were Cohort 1 and 34 schools were in Cohort 2.
Universe View help for Universe
Schools in the United States that met the following eligibility criteria: serve students in Grades 6 through 8, eligible for Title I status, willing to comply with the study's data request, and at least 75 percent of its teachers voted to adopt the PTi3 program.