CBS News/MTV/Gates Foundation Monthly Poll, March 2005 (ICPSR 4322)
Consequences of Introducing Educational Testing in Northern Ireland, 1973-1977 (ICPSR 7790)
Evaluation of City Year's Whole School Whole Child Model in Five Urban School Districts, United States, 2007-2019 (ICPSR 38966)
City Year is an education and human development organization that partners with schools nationwide to support student success and address the root causes of inequitable educational outcomes. Every year, City Year recruits a diverse group of AmeriCorps members, ages 18-25, to deliver its holistic Whole School Whole Child (WSWC) model. The corps members commit to serving as "Student Success Coaches" in schools full time for one school year. During that time, they provide universal holistic services to all students (Tier 1 services), as well as targeted academic, social and emotional, behavior, and attendance services to students at increased risk of not graduating based on early warning indicators (Tier 2 services).
In 2017, the American Institutes for Research (AIR) and MDRC began a five-year evaluation of WSWC services in 22 middle schools in five large, urban school districts. The evaluation includes two impact studies. The first study explored the implementation and effects of the entire WSWC model (Tier 1 and Tier 2 services) for all students, using a quasi-experimental study design ("Whole School Study"). The second study attempted to isolate the effect of Tier 2 services for students who were identified as being at heightened risk of dropping out of school, using a student-level randomized experiment ("Tier 2 Study").
This data collection features data from the first study.
Higher Achievement Evaluation, United States, 2014-2019 (ICPSR 38350)
The Higher Achievement evaluation is a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial study of Higher Achievement, an intensive summer and after-school program that offers participants more than 500 hours of academic enrichment activities a year to help them meet the high academic standards expected of college-bound students.
Higher Achievement students ("scholars") enter the program during the summer before either fifth or sixth grade and commit to attending through eighth grade. This study collected school records data from the 2014-2015 school year through the 2018-2019 school year on three cohorts of scholars, starting with the scholars' year before entering the program (baseline) and two years of follow-up post program entry.
These student records included course grades, standardized test scores, attendance information, and demographic variables. In addition, surveys were conducted among center directors of Higher Achievement centers, mentor volunteers, and parents of scholars to collect information on program implementation and service contrast between program-attending and control students.
National Assessment of Educational Progress: 1987 High School Transcript Study (ICPSR 2256)
National Assessment of Educational Progress [United States], 1970-1980 (ICPSR 8072)
Replication Data and Materials for "How Do Schools React? Making Sense of Organizational Responses to Accountability Pressure": Urban Schools in Chile, 2018–2020 (ICPSR 303828)
This deposit contains the replication data and materials associated with the article “How Do Schools React? Making Sense of Organizational Responses to Accountability Pressure.” The study examines how schools in Chile respond to performance-based accountability (PBA) in a highly marketized education system. The quantitative component draws on survey data from teachers (n = 1,130) and school leaders (n = 200) in 79 urban schools located in the metropolitan areas of Santiago, Valparaíso, and Concepción. The qualitative component includes semi-structured interviews with school leaders (n = 23) and teachers (n = 28) from 15 urban schools in Santiago’s Metropolitan Region, complemented by documentary analysis. The materials document school responses to accountability pressure, including teaching to the test, curricular alignment, resource redistribution, data use, and actors’ beliefs about the fairness, validity, and pressure associated with standardized testing and accountability policies. The deposit is intended to support transparency, verification, and reuse of the study’s analytic procedures and findings.