Search results

Search tips
Showing 1 – 13 of 13 results.
Self-published

Broadly Shared Local Economic Success since 2000: New Measures and New Lessons for Communities (ICPSR 193804)

Released/updated on: 2024-03-22
Time period: 2000-01-01--2019-12-31
In recent decades, many local labor markets—especially those in former industrial areas—have experienced lagging employment rates, hourly wages, and annual earnings. Even in places that have thrived, disadvantaged racial and ethnic groups and those with less education have often fared poorly, and long-term growth has bypassed many Americans at the middle and bottom of the income distribution. This report examines the relative economic success over the past two decades (prior to the COVID pandemic) of different local labor markets throughout the United States, both for residents overall and for those of different demographic groups. We construct a new, publicly available database for economic indicators for these labor markets—both commuting zones and core-based statistical areas—for each of 160 demographic cells and three time periods. Our economic indicators account for demographic and cost-of-living differences across areas, facilitating comparisons of economic trends across geographies for different groups of interest. We show that locations that have performed well in terms of employment growth have not always performed well in terms of earnings growth; moreover, areas that have seen broad growth overall for their residents have often seen growth lag for vulnerable groups. To more systematically understand factors associated with economic success for different groups, we examine the relationship with baseline correlates and supplement these descriptive regressions with narrative case studies. Although initial industry mix plays an important role, other factors, including government investment and local leadership, may matter even more.The data files included here provide the economic indictors we use for multiple geographies, time periods, and demographic groups, allowing replication and additional analyses.
Self-published

Social Heterogeneity, Local Capacity, and Urban Parks (ICPSR 117390)

Released/updated on: 2020-04-29
Geographic coverage: United States
Please cite the corresponding article if this dataset is used to support additional findings:
Leon-Moreta, Agustin, Vittoria R. Totaro, and David S. Dixon. "Social heterogeneity, local capacity, and urban parks: Evidence from US cities." Cities 99 (2020): 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102588
The data described here were used in the analysis and findings reported in the article reference above. A STATA (V. 13) do-file for calculating variables and R scripts for deriving the reported geospatial model are also included. Please cite the corresponding article if this dataset is used to support additional findings.
Self-published

Ballot Measures for Open Space Conservation: Economic and Institutional Processes in Cities (ICPSR 112162)

Released/updated on: 2019-11-04
Geographic coverage: United States
Please cite the corresponding article if this dataset is used to support additional findings:
Leon-Moreta, A. "Ballot Measures for Open Space Conservation: Economic and Institutional Processes in Cities." Urban Affairs Review (2019): 1-34. doi:10.1177/1078087419884732.
The data described here were used in the analysis and findings reported in the article, Leon-Moreta, A. "Ballot Measures for Open Space Conservation: Economic and Institutional Processes in Cities." Urban Affairs Review (2019): 1-34. doi:10.1177/1078087419884732. A STATA (V. 13) do-file for calculating variables is also included. Please cite the corresponding article if this dataset is used to support additional findings.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1078087419884732Cited Datasets:
The dataset described here cites data from the following sources:Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2002–2012. Consumer Price Index. https://www.bls.gov (accessed March 27, 2018).
Berry, William, Evan Ringquist, Richard Fording, and Russell Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327-348.
Census Bureau. 1987–2012. Census of Governments. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
Census Bureau. 2000. Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
Census Bureau. 2005–2014. American Community Survey. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
Census Bureau. 1988–2011. Boundary and Annexation Survey. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
International City/County Management Association. 1996–2011. Municipal Form of Government Surveys. Washington, DC: ICMA.
National Center for Charitable Statistics. 2000–2010. IRS Business Master File. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
National Historical Geographic Information System. 2001–2011. National Land Cover Database. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Trust for Public Land. 2018. LandVote®. Landvote.org (accessed March 27, 2018).
Trust for Public Land. 2000, 2005, 2010. National Conservation Easement Database.
National Agricultural Statistics Service. Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
Woods & Poole. 2000 through 2010. MSA Profile. Washington, DC: Woods & Poole.
Curated
Restricted

Sex Trafficking of Minors: The Impact of Legislative Reform and Judicial Decision Making in Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Communities, Kentucky, 2007-2018 (ICPSR 37168)

Released/updated on: 2019-07-25
Geographic coverage: United States, Kentucky
Time period: 2013-01-01--2017-12-31, 2016-01-01--2018-12-31, 2016-01-01--2017-12-31, 2015-01-01--2018-12-31, 2016-01-01--2017-12-31, 2012-01-01--2015-12-31, 2007-01-01--2017-12-31

These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.

This study includes data that was used to investigate the effect of legislative and judicial factors on system responses to sex trafficking of minors (STM) in metropolitan and non-metropolitan communities. To accomplish this, researchers evaluated the effectiveness of the immunity, protection, and rehabilitative elements of a state safe harbor law. This project was undertaken as a response to a growing push to pass state safe harbor laws to align governmental and community responses to the reframing of the issue of sex trafficking of minors that was ushered in with the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA).

This collection includes 4 SPSS files, 3 Excel data files, and 2 SPSS Syntax files:

  1. Child-Welfare-Human-Trafficking-Reports-2013-2017-data.xlsx
  2. Judicial-Interview-De-identified-Quantitative-Data-for-NACJD_REV_Oct2018.sav (n=82; 36 variables)
  3. Judicial-online-survey-data-for-NACJD_REV_Dec2018.sav (n=55; 77 variables)
  4. Juvenile-Justice-Screening-for-HT-2015-MU-MU-0009.xlsx
  5. Post-implementation-survey-data-for-NACJD_REV_Dec2018.sav (n=365; 1029 variables)
  6. Pre-implementation-survey-data-for-NACJD_REV_Dec2018.sav (n=323; 159 variables)
  7. Recode-syntax-for-pre-implementation-survey-for-NACJD.sps
  8. Statewide-juvenile-court-charges-2015-MU-MU-0009-to-NACJD.xlsx
  9. Syntax-for-post-implementation-survey-data-to-NACJD.sps

Qualitative data from judicial interviews and agency open-ended responses to Post-Implementation of the Safe Harbor Law Survey are not available as part of this collection.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2015 Metropolitan Data, Including an Arts and Culture Module (ICPSR 36805)

Released/updated on: 2019-03-05
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2015-01-01--2015-12-31

The 2015 American Housing Survey marks the first release of a newly integrated national sample and independent metropolitan area samples. The 2015 release features many variable name revisions, as well as the integration of an AHS Codebook Interactive Tool available on the U.S. Census Bureau Web site. This data collection provides information on representative samples of each of the 15 largest metropolitan areas across the United States, which are also included in the integrated national sample (available as ICPSR 36801). The metropolitan area sample also features representative samples of 10 additional metropolitan areas that are not present in the national sample. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Census Bureau intend to survey the 15 largest metropolitan areas once every 2 years.

To ensure the sample was representative of all housing units within each metro area, the U.S. Census Bureau stratified all housing units into one of the following categories: (1) A HUD-assisted unit (as of 2013); (2) Trailer or mobile home; (3) Owner-occupied and one unit in structure; (4) Owner-occupied and two or more units in structure; (5) Renter-occupied and one unit in structure; (6) Renter-occupied and two or more units in structure; (7) Vacant and one unit in structure; (8) Vacant and two or more units in structure; and (9) Other units, such as houseboats and recreational vehicles.

The data are presented in three separate parts: Part 1, Household Record (Main Record); Part 2, Person Record; and Part 3, Project Record. Household Record data includes questions about household occupancy and tenure, household exterior and interior structural features, household equipment and appliances, housing problems, housing costs, home improvement, neighborhood features, recent moving information, income, and basic demographic information. The Household Record data also features four rotating topical modules: Arts and Culture, Food Security, Housing Counseling, and Healthy Homes. Person Record data includes questions about personal disabilities, income, and basic demographic information. Finally, Project Record data includes questions about home improvement projects. Specific questions were asked about the types of projects, costs, funding sources, and year of completion.

External data

Rural Establishment Innovation Survey (ICPSR 36544)

Released/updated on: 2016-11-29
Geographic coverage: United States

In 2014, the United States Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service (USDA ERS) conducted the Rural Establishment Innovation Survey (REIS). This survey provides a nationally representative sample of innovation processes in rural businesses. REIS defines innovation as the introduction of new goods, services, or ways of doing business that are valued by consumers. Traditional measures from secondary data sources, such as patents or research and development (R&D) expenditures, focus on science and engineering-based innovation, which usually depict rural innovation as rare or idiosyncratic. By focusing instead on a broader definition of innovation, the REIS provides a fuller assessment of rural innovative capacity.

The main research questions for this survey were:

  • Are rural firms as innovative as urban firms?
  • What constraints are impeding the innovative capacity of firms?
  • What strategies are innovative firms using to mitigate these constraints?

The target population for the survey was Nonmetro and metro establishments with 5 or more employees in tradable sectors (mining, manufacturing, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, finance, information, professional/technical/scientific services, arts and management of businesses). REIS used the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Business Register for its sampling frame. Responses from 11,600 businesses were usable.

These data include responses from businesses in the Arts & Museums industry category. These businesses were oversampled by a factor of 3.3 to ensure reliable statistics.

The REIS data are restricted and require users to apply for access to the data. For permission to access to these data, visit the ERS Rural Economy Population: Business Industry page and scroll to the bottom of the page for contact information. If permission to access the data is granted, the data can be viewed through the NORC data enclave.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2009: New Orleans Data (ICPSR 30943)

Released/updated on: 2016-04-18
Geographic coverage: United States, Louisiana, New Orleans
Time period: 2009-01-01--2009-12-31

This data collection is part of the American Housing Metropolitan Survey (AHS-MS, or "metro") which is conducted in odd-numbered years. It cycles through a set of 21 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every six years. The metro survey, like the national survey, is longitudinal. This particular survey provides information on the characteristics of a New Orleans metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units in 2009. The data are presented in eight separate parts: Part 1, Home Improvement Record, Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages Recorded, Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner of Rental Units Record, Part 6, Person Record, Part 7, High Burden Unit Record, and Part 8, Recent Mover Groups Record.

Part 1 data include questions about upgrades and remodeling, cost of alterations and repairs, as well as the household member who performed the alteration/repair. Part 2 data include journey to work or commuting information, such as method of transportation to work, length of trip, and miles traveled to work. Additional information collected covers number of hours worked at home, number of days worked at home, average time respondent leaves for work in the morning or evening, whether respondent drives to work alone or with others, and a few other questions pertaining to self-employment and work schedule. Part 3 data include mortgage information, such as type of mortgage obtained by respondent, amount and term of mortgages, as well as years needed to pay them off. Other items asked include monthly payment amount, reason mortgage was taken out, and who provided the mortgage. Part 4 data include household-level information, including demographic information, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. The following topics are also included: data recodes, unit characteristics, and weighting information.

Part 5 data include information pertaining to owners of rental properties and whether the owner/resident manager lives on-site. Part 6 data include individual person level information, in which respondents were queried on basic demographic information (i.e. age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder), as well as if they worked at all last week, month and year moved into residence, and their ability to perform everyday tasks and whether they have difficulty hearing, seeing, and concentrating or remembering things. Part 7 data include verification of income to cost when the ratio of income to cost is outside of certain tolerances. Respondents were asked whether they receive help or assistance with grocery bills, clothing and transportation expenses, child care payments, medical and utility bills, as well as with rent payments. Part 8 data include recent mover information, such as how many people were living in last unit before move, whether last residence was a condo or a co-op, as well as whether this residence was outside of the United States.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2009: Seattle Data (ICPSR 30942)

Released/updated on: 2016-03-21
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 2009-01-01--2009-12-31

This data collection is part of the American Housing Metropolitan Survey (AHS-MS, or "metro") which is conducted in odd-numbered years. It cycles through a set of 21 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every six years. The metro survey, like the national survey, is longitudinal. This particular survey provides information on the characteristics of a Seattle metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units in 2009. The data are presented in eight separate parts: Part 1, Home Improvement Record, Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages Recorded, Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner of Rental Units Record, Part 6, Person Record, Part 7, High Burden Unit Record, and Part 8, Recent Mover Groups Record.

Part 1 data include questions about upgrades and remodeling, cost of alterations and repairs, as well as the household member who performed the alteration/repair. Part 2 data include journey to work or commuting information, such as method of transportation to work, length of trip, and miles traveled to work. Additional information collected covers number of hours worked at home, number of days worked at home, average time respondent leaves for work in the morning or evening, whether respondent drives to work alone or with others, and a few other questions pertaining to self-employment and work schedule. Part 3 data include mortgage information, such as type of mortgage obtained by respondent, amount and term of mortgages, as well as years needed to pay them off. Other items asked include monthly payment amount, reason mortgage was taken out, and who provided the mortgage. Part 4 data include household-level information, including demographic information, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. The following topics are also included: data recodes, unit characteristics, and weighting information.

Part 5 data include information pertaining to owners of rental properties and whether the owner/resident manager lives on-site. Part 6 data include individual person level information, in which respondents were queried on basic demographic information (i.e. age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder), as well as if they worked at all last week, month and year moved into residence, and their ability to perform everyday tasks and whether they have difficulty hearing, seeing, and concentrating or remembering things. Part 7 data include verification of income to cost when the ratio of income to cost is outside of certain tolerances. Respondents were asked whether they receive help or assistance with grocery bills, clothing and transportation expenses, child care payments, medical and utility bills, as well as with rent payments. Part 8 data include recent mover information, such as how many people were living in last unit before move, whether last residence was a condo or a co-op, as well as whether this residence was outside of the United States.

Curated

Crime in Boomburb Cities: 1970-2004 [United States] (ICPSR 29202)

Released/updated on: 2011-08-10
Geographic coverage: San Bernardino, United States, St. Petersburg, California, Florida, Miami, Santa Clara, San Diego, Atlanta, Orlando, Texas, Colorado, Phoenix, Denver, Georgia, Tampa, Dallas, Arizona, Las Vegas, Nevada, Houston, Riverside
Time period: 1970-01-01--2004-12-31
This study focused on the effect of economic resources and racial/ethnic composition on the change in crime rates from 1970-2004 in United States cities in metropolitan areas that experienced a large growth in population after World War II. A total of 352 cities in the following United States metropolitan areas were selected for this study: Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Las Vegas, Miami, Orange County, Orlando, Phoenix, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Silicon Valley (Santa Clara), and Tampa/St. Petersburg. Selection was based on the fact that these areas developed during a similar time period and followed comparable development trajectories. In particular, these 14 areas, known as the "boomburbs" for their dramatic, post-World War II population growth, all faced issues relating to the rapid growth of tract-style housing and the subsequent development of low density, urban sprawls. The study combined place-level data obtained from the United States Census with crime data from the Uniform Crime Reports for five categories of Type I crimes: aggravated assaults, robberies, murders, burglaries, and motor vehicle thefts. The dataset contains a total of 247 variables pertaining to crime, economic resources, and race/ethnic composition.
Curated

State and Metropolitan Area Data Book [United States]: 1991 (ICPSR 6398)

Released/updated on: 2008-10-09
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1991-01-01--1991-12-31
This data collection provides statistics gathered from a variety of federal agencies and national associations. Demographic, economic, and governmental data from both the federal government and private agencies are presented to enable multiarea comparisons as well as single-area profiles. Current estimates and benchmark census results are included. Data are available for five types of geographic coverage: (1) Metro Areas data cover 249 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), 17 consolidated metropolitan statistical areas (CMSAs), 54 primary metropolitan statistical areas (PSMAs), and 16 New England county metropolitan areas (NECMAs). Metro Areas data include the following general subjects: area and population, households, vital statistics, health, education, crime, housing, money income, personal income, civilian labor force, employment, construction, commercial office space, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, service industries, banking, federal funds and grants, and government employment. There are 14 parts for Metro Areas. (2) State Metro/Nonmetro data cover the United States, the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the metropolitan and nonmetropolitan portions of these areas. State Metro/Nonmetro data include most of the subjects listed for Metro Areas. There are six parts for State Metro/Nonmetro. (3) Metro Counties data cover 336 metropolitan areas and their component counties and include topics identical to those presented in the State Metro/Nonmetro data. Six parts are supplied for Metro Counties. (4) Metro Central Cities data cover 336 metropolitan areas and their 522 central cities and 336 outside central cities portions. Metro Central Cities variables are limited to 13 items, which include area and population, money income, civilian labor force, and retail trade. There is one part for Metro Central Cities. (5) States data cover the United States, the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and census regions and divisions. States data include the same items as the Metro Areas data, plus information on social welfare programs, geography and environment, domestic travel and parks, gross state product, poverty, wealth holders, business, research and development, agriculture, forestry and fisheries, minerals and mining, transportation, communications, energy, state government, federal government, and elections. There are 101 parts for States.
Curated

Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [United States]: Subject Summary Tape File (SSTF) 7, Metropolitan Housing Characteristics (ICPSR 2446)

Released/updated on: 2008-06-27
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1990-01-01--1990-12-31

This data collection contains sample data from the 1990 Census weighted to represent the total population. Data items covered by the collection include age of householder, number of rooms and bedrooms, condominium status, contract rent, educational attainment of householder, gross rent, house heating fuel, household income, household type, presence and age of children, kitchen facilities, marital status, meals included in rent, means of transportation to work, mortgage status, number of persons in unit, persons per room, plumbing facilities, poverty status, presence of nonrelatives, selected monthly owner costs, telephone in unit, housing tenure, travel time to work, number of units in structure, value of housing unit, vehicles available, workers in household, year householder moved into unit, and year structure was built. In addition, the file contains 100-percent counts and unweighted sample counts for total persons and total housing units. The information is presented in 323 tables that are tabulated for every geographic unit represented in the data. There is one variable per table cell, plus additional variables with geographic information. Almost all of the tables are iterated by race and Hispanic origin: White, Black, American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut, Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic origin (of any race), and White, not of Hispanic origin.

All of the tables are shown for six levels of observation: United States, regions, divisions, states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA)/Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CMSA), and Primary Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The data were supplied in eight data files, each with a portion of the cases. In addition, ICPSR produced a combined file with all of the cases.

External data

State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS) (ICPSR 143)

Released/updated on: 2006-04-03
Geographic coverage: United States
The State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS) was created by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) in the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). SOCDS provides data for individual metropolitan areas, central cities, and suburbs. Via the SOCDS home page, users can access detailed demographic and economic characteristics of the United States population using decennial Census data from 1970 to 2000. SOCDS also provides: (1) the latest available unemployment rates, (2) information on jobs, business establishments, and average pay in the 1990s, (3) data on violent and property crime rates collected by the FBI, (4) information on local building permits, and (5) information on city and suburban government finances.
Curated

State and Metropolitan Area Data Book [United States]: 1982 (ICPSR 8187)

Released/updated on: 2006-01-18
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1982-01-01--1982-12-31
This collection is composed of two files, a State File (Part 1) and a Metropolitan Area File (Part 2), both of which contain statistics gathered from approximately 70 government and private agencies. The State File contains variables on population, households, vital statistics, health, education, crime, social insurance and welfare, housing, land use, labor force and unions, income, utilities, banking, elections, and veterans. Data are available for all states and the District of Columbia, the United States, and Census regions and divisions. The Metropolitan Area File covers the same general topics as the State File. Data are available for the United States, all Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs), Standard Consolidated Statistical Areas (SCSAs), and metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas.
Back to top