Showing 1 – 11 of 11 results.
Self-published
Replication Files for "Corporations and partnerships: Factory productivity in late Imperial Russia" (ICPSR 208343)
Released/updated on: 2024-08-15
Geographic coverage: Russia
Time period: 1907-01-01--1909-12-31
This is the replication package for "Corporations and partnerships: Factory productivity in late Imperial Russia," a study investigating factory productivity between corporations and partnerships in Imperial Russia. The replication package includes data and code to replicate the results found in the paper.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs
United States Census of Manufactures, 1929-1935 (ICPSR 37114)
Released/updated on: 2023-03-09
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1935-12-31
These data are sourced from transcriptions of the original establishment-level schedules from the United States Census of Manufactures taken in 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935. This dataset combines industries currently archived by ICPSR with new transcriptions. In total, twenty-five industries are included representing some 20 percent of manufacturing output. In addition to information transcribed verbatim from Census schedules, the dataset includes establishment identifiers constructed to link establishments across the censuses.
The twenty-five industries included are Agricultural Implements, Aviation, Beverages, Blast Furnaces, Bone Black, Cement, Cigars and cigarettes, Concrete, Glass, manufactured Ice, Ice cream, Linoleum, Macaroni, Malt, Matches, Motor Vehicles, Petroleum Refining, Planing-mill products, Radio, Rubber tires, Soap, Steel works, Cane Sugar, Refining Sugar.
Self-published
Replication Files for "Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia" (ICPSR 148103)
Released/updated on: 2022-06-27
Time period: 1894-01-01--1894-12-31
This is the replication package for "Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia," a study investigating operating time in Imperial Russian factories. The replication package includes code and data to replicate the factory-level, district-level, and province-level results found in the paper.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs
United States Census of Manufactures, Sugar Refining Industry, 1929, 1931, 1933, 1935 (ICPSR 37211)
Released/updated on: 2018-12-12
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1929-12-31, 1931-01-01--1931-12-31, 1933-01-01--1933-12-31, 1935-01-01--1935-12-31
The United States Census Bureau has conducted surveys of manufacturing activity since 1810 with fluctuating frequency. Between 1919 and 1939 the Census of Manufactures (CM) was conducted biennially. This data collection consists of individual-plant data from the Census of Manufactures for 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935, the only years in this span for which original returns are available. The records of the Sugar Refining Industry have been coded to produce an electronic dataset to provide the basis for microeconomic evidence for the study of the Great Depression. The dataset contains observations on sugar refining operations, plants (e.g. name, location, etc.), products made, operation and working hours, employment, wages and salaries, and operating costs.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs
United States Census of Manufactures, Blast Furnace Industry, 1929, 1931, 1933, 1935 (ICPSR 37208)
Released/updated on: 2018-12-10
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1929-12-31, 1931-01-01--1931-12-31, 1933-01-01--1933-12-31, 1935-01-01--1935-12-31
The United States Census Bureau has conducted surveys of manufacturing activity since 1810 with fluctuating frequency. Between 1919 and 1939 the Census of Manufactures (CM) was conducted biennially. This data collection consists of individual-plant data from the Census of Manufactures for 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935, the only years in this span for which original returns are available. The records of the Blast Furnace Industry have been coded to produce an electronic dataset to provide the basis for microeconomic evidence for the study of the Great Depression. The dataset contains observations on blast furnace operations, steel plants (e.g. name, location, etc.), productivity, output, operation and working hours, employment, wages, operating costs and amount of materials used, machinery, and the effects of The Great Depression.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs
United States Census of Manufactures, Motor Vehicle Industry, 1929-1935 (ICPSR 35604)
Released/updated on: 2015-05-22
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1929-12-31, 1931-01-01--1931-12-31, 1933-01-01--1933-12-31, 1935-01-01--1935-12-31
The United States Census Bureau has conducted surveys of manufacturing activity since 1810 with fluctuating frequency. Between 1919 and 1939 the Census of Manufactures (CM) was conducted biennially. This data collection consists of individual-plant data from the Census of Manufactures for 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935, the only years in this span for which original returns are available. The records of the Motor Vehicle Industry have been coded to produce an electronic data set to provide the basis for microeconomic evidence for the study of the Great Depression. The data set contains observations on: basic information about the plants (e.g. name, location, owner, etc.), products made and materials used, operation and working hours, employment, wages and salaries, costs and amount of materials used, value and quantity of products by type, and power used.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs
United States Census of Manufactures, Cotton Goods Industry, 1929-1935 (ICPSR 35605)
Released/updated on: 2015-05-22
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1929-12-31, 1931-01-01--1931-12-31, 1933-01-01--1933-12-31, 1935-01-01--1935-12-31
The United States Census Bureau has conducted surveys of manufacturing activity since 1810 with fluctuating frequency. Between 1919 and 1939 the Census of Manufactures (CM) was conducted biennially. This data collection consists of individual-plant data from the Census of Manufactures for 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935, the only years in this span for which original returns are available. The records of the Cotton Goods Industry have been coded to produce an electronic dataset to provide the basis for microeconomic evidence for the study of the Great Depression. The dataset contains observations on: basic information about the plants (e.g. name, location, owner, etc.), products made and materials used, operation and working hours, employment, wages and salaries, costs and amount of materials used, value of products and processing tax (1933 and 1935), machinery, and power used.
Curated
United States Census of Manufactures, Motor Vehicle and Textile Industry Plants, 1929, 1931, 1933, 1935 (ICPSR 31761)
Released/updated on: 2011-10-28
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1929-01-01--1929-12-31, 1931-01-01--1931-12-31, 1933-01-01--1933-12-31, 1935-01-01--1935-12-31
This data collection consists of individual-plant data from the Census of Manufactures, conducted by the United States Bureau of the Census, for 1929, 1931, 1933, and 1935. The purpose of this research was to analyze the economic behavior of the American industrial economy during the period 1929-1935, which spans the largest decline in demand ever to strike the manufacturing sector of the economy. This project created establishment panel data sets for the automotive, automotive parts, and textile industries.
Curated
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, May 1988 (ICPSR 9064)
Released/updated on: 2008-02-20
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1988-05-19--1988-05-25
This data collection is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that evaluates the Reagan presidency and solicits opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Topics covered include important problems facing the country, the economy, foreign affairs, United States relations with the Soviet Union, nuclear weapons policy, and a federal law requiring businesses to give workers 60-day advance notice of factory closings. In addition, respondents were queried as to which party had the best chance of winning the presidency in November, how closely the respondent was following the race, which candidate the respondent would vote for among several possible tickets if the election were held that day, what the respondent liked and disliked most about the candidates, and if the respondent had a favorable or unfavorable impression of various public figures. Respondents also were asked a detailed series of questions comparing the two candidates George Bush and Michael Dukakis, and another set of questions relating to Nancy Reagan's influence and her reported use of the advice of an astrologer. Background information on respondents includes political alignment, 1984 presidential vote choice, sex, education, age, religion, marital status, household composition, labor union membership, employment status, race, income, and state/region of residence.
Curated
Advance Notice Provisions in Plant Closings (ICPSR 1005)
Released/updated on: 1996-01-03
Geographic coverage: United States
These data and/or computer programs are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the INVESTIGATOR(S) if further information is desired.
Curated
Industrial Location Decisions, 1972 (ICPSR 7615)
Released/updated on: 1992-02-16
Geographic coverage: Detroit, United States, Chicago, Atlanta, Illinois, Georgia, Michigan
Time period: 1972-01-01--1972-12-31
This data collection contains survey data gathered in June and July of 1972 from decision-makers at 173 industrial plants in three United States cities: Detroit, Michigan, Chicago, Illinois, and Atlanta, Georgia. The survey was carried out by members of the Economic Behavior Program at the University of Michigan's Survey Research Center who personally administered questionnaires to high-level staff members at each company (e.g., president, vice president, general manager, office manager, or public relations director). Respondents were asked to give reasons for the present location of the plant and to outline the advantages and disadvantages of its location. The duration of plant operations, level of production, sales, geographical area served, future expansion, and production problems were all examined as well.