Assessing Applied Econometric Results (ICPSR 1075)
British Economic Imperialism, 1869-1914 (ICPSR 7738)
Credit Unions and the Common Bond (ICPSR 1214)
Decision-Related Research on the Organization of Service Delivery Systems in Metropolitan Areas: Fire Protection (ICPSR 7409)
Decision-Related Research on the Organization of Service Delivery Systems in Metropolitan Areas: Solid Waste Management (ICPSR 7487)
Economic Uncertainty and Divisive Politics: Evidence from the dos Españas (ICPSR 186621)
The Effects of World War II Military Service: Evidence from Australia (ICPSR 100759)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Arizona, 1975-1976 (ICPSR 7887)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Arkansas, 1976-1977 (ICPSR 7884)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Connecticut, 1975-1976 (ICPSR 7881)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Los Angeles, 1976-1979 (ICPSR 7864)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: North Carolina, 1977-1978 (ICPSR 7885)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Ohio, 1976-1977 (ICPSR 7882)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Oklahoma, 1977-1978 (ICPSR 7886)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Puerto Rico, 1978-1980 (ICPSR 7888)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Rhode Island, 1977-1978 (ICPSR 7883)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Vermont, 1975-1976 (ICPSR 7889)
Electric Utility Rate Demonstration Project: Wisconsin, 1976-1980 (ICPSR 7880)
How Well Do Monetary Fundamentals Forecast Exchange Rates? (ICPSR 1268)
Inequality, Social Capital, and Health in Bolivia, 2008-2009 (ICPSR 38898)
This randomized controlled trial examined the independent effect of village income inequality and individual income on individual health. Specifically, the study assessed how these two variables interacted with social capital to affect individual health. For the trial, 40 villages were selected for two experimental treatments.
In the first treatment, 13 villages were picked at random to receive 782kg of edible rice as in-kind income. The 782kg of rice was split equally between all households in the village. For the second treatment, another 13 villages were picked at random. Each village in the second treatment received the same amount of rice as the villages in the first treatment (782kg), but all of the rice went to the poorest 20 percent of households in the village, with each household getting the same amount of rice. All households in the remaining 14 villages and all households in the top 80 percent of the village income distribution of the second treatment acted as controls, and received 6kg of high-yielding, improved rice seeds.
The baseline survey was administered between February and May 2008, households received the rice between October 2008 and January 2009, and the end-line survey was administered between February and May 2009. Outcomes included anthropometric indicators of nutritional status, perceived health, and blood pressure.