Content Analysis of Undergraduate Psychology Textbooks (ICPSR 36966)
Psychology is one of the most popular undergraduate majors in American universities, despite the fact that the discipline still has many unsettled questions regarding fundamental philosophical and methodological issues. These issues may be associated with a lack of clarity regarding an accurate conception of science and the nature of the relationship between psychology and science with respect to these controversies. Kuhn (1967) has suggested that scientific paradigms are transmitted in textbooks.
To understand how the scientific status of psychology is depicted, 30 undergraduate textbooks were examined. Textbooks were examined on the following categories:
- What constitutes science is controversial
- Bad (Pseudo) science
- Second demarcation problem
- Deductive stance
- Inductive stance
- Verisimilitude/tentativeness of science
- Theory ladenness of facts
- The role of theory in hypothesis formation
- The role of competing theories (i.e. Laudan)
- Social constructionism (vs. natural kinds)
- Rhetorical views of science
- Science and biases (e.g., political influences)
- The role of ad hoc hypotheses
- Evolutionary epistemology
- Recognition of conceptual problems (i.e. is it important for science to address conceptual problems or only empirical ones?)
- Kuhnian paradigms
- Mature vs pre-paradigm sciences
- Strict method vs "anything goes" (i.e. Feyerabend).
Introductory, cognitive, social, and abnormal textbooks were examined.
National Center for Research on Early Childhood Education Teacher Professional Development Study (2007-2011) (ICPSR 34848)
The Professional Development Study (PDS) is a randomized controlled evaluation of two forms of professional development delivered to over 490 early childhood education teachers: (1) coursework on effective instructional interactions (as defined by the Classroom Assessment Scoring System [CLASS], an observational measure with established links to child outcomes) and (2) video-based consultation support through MyTeachingPartner (MTP). These professional development supports aim to improve teachers' implementation of language/literacy activities and interactions with children, as well as promote gains in children's social and academic development.
The questionnaires and measures used to gather the study data were initially compiled into 76 Raw-level files. The Raw-level data were in turn used by the research team at NCRECE to create 10 comprehensive Analysis-level files in order to avoid any inaccuracies that might result from incorrectly merging the Raw files. The Analysis-level files are organized by participant and phase of study. Whenever possible, Analysis files should be utilized instead of merging individual Raw files.
Additional information about this study can be found at the NCRECE web site.