Applying Artificial Intelligence to Person-Based Policing Practices, 2019-2023 (ICPSR 39074)
Census of Population and Housing, 1980 [United States]: Master Area Reference File (MARF): 1978 Richmond Dress Rehearsal (ICPSR 7850)
Comparison of Methods for Learning Choropleth Maps [1988-1990: United States] (ICPSR 9759)
Congressional Redistricting Computer Program (ICPSR 7244)
Developing and Testing New Methods for Estimating Treatment Effectiveness in Observational Studies Using High-Dimensional Data [Methods Study], 2023 (ICPSR 39090)
Propensity scores (PS) and instrumental variables (IV) are methods used to assess treatment effects in observational studies when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible. However, these methods have limitations, especially when using high-dimensional data, or data with numerous variables or many non-linear and interaction terms. Choices on which variables and non-linear and interaction terms to include may lead to model misspecification. The objective of this study was to develop and test a set of PS and IV methods that account for model misspecification when estimating causal effects of treatments using high-dimensional data.
First, the research team created the two new methods for use with high-dimensional data. The team then used a computer program to create test data that look like real patient data. The team applied the new methods to the test data. Next, the research team applied the new methods to real data from previous studies. They applied the PS method to data from Connors et al. (1996) and applied the IV method to data used by Card (1995). Using both test and real data, the research team compared findings from the new methods with those from existing PS and IV methods and checked to see if findings from the new methods were accurate when including different patient traits and health conditions in the analysis.
This collection contains the R software package RCAL and accompanying documentation. The package source as a .tar.gz file and six different versions are available in a zipped package. Files have been released as received by ICPSR from the depositor:
- For R version 4.2, created April 24, 2022 (Windows, r-oldrel)
- For R version 4.3, created October 20, 2023 (Windows, r-release)
- For R version 4.4, created March 14, 2024 (Windows, r-devel)
- For R version 4.2, created April 1, 2023 (Mac, arm64, r-oldrel)
- For R version 4.3, created April 6, 2023 (Mac, arm64, r-release)
- For R version 4.3, created April 11, 2023 (Mac, x86_64, r-release)
Evaluation of the Community Supervision Mapping System for Released Prisoners in Rhode Island, 2008-2010 (ICPSR 32004)
Global Digital Activism Data Set, 2013 (ICPSR 34625)
Improving Outcomes for English Learners through Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ICPSR 141061)
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Profile Data, [1968-1978] (ICPSR 8075)
Learning Within Health Care Delivery Systems: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Longitudinal Cluster Randomized Trials [Methods Study], 2023 (ICPSR 39089)
Cluster randomized trials, or CRTs, are research studies that compare treatments among different groups of patients, or clusters. An example of a cluster is a group of people who receive care at a single clinic. One type of CRT is a stepped-wedge CRT. These CRTs compare patients' health before and after a new treatment. In stepped-wedge CRTs, all groups start with the standard treatment. Then, each group switches to the new treatment at a specific time during the study. By the end of the study, all groups are receiving the new treatment. In stepped-wedge CRTs, group characteristics, such as how clinics follow up with patients, can affect how well a treatment works. It is hard to figure out if changes in a patient's health are due to the treatment or group characteristics. In this study, the research team wanted to improve how to plan and analyze stepped-wedge CRTs for studying the effect of treatments.
The study had two parts. In the first part, the research team looked at ways to measure how well treatments work in stepped-wedge CRTs in ways that account for group characteristics. In the second part, the research team looked at which statistical methods got accurate results when using data from stepped-wedge CRTs. The team first used a computer program to create test data that looked like data from a stepped-wedge CRT. The team created the test data using nine scenarios; each scenario had a different set of conditions. For example, the number of patient groups varied across each scenario. Using the test data, the team compared six statistical methods for analyzing data from stepped-wedge CRTs. The research team also created a statistical program to help plan and analyze stepped-wedge CRTs.
This collection contains the R software package swCRTdesign and accompanying documentation. The package source as a .tar.gz file and six different versions are available in a zipped package. Files have been released as received by ICPSR from the depositor:
- For R version 4.2.3, created March, 11, 2024 (Windows)
- For R version 4.3.3, created March, 10, 2024 (Windows)
- For R version 4.4.0, created March, 11, 2024 (Windows)
- For R version 4.2.0, created August, 27, 2023 (macOS)
- For R version 4.3.0, created August, 26, 2023 (macOS)
- For R version 4.3.0, created August, 27, 2023 (macOS)
Randomize Everyone: Creating Valid Instrumental Variables for Learning Health Care Systems [Methods Study], New Hampshire, 2016-2022 (ICPSR 39717)
Comparative effectiveness research, or CER, compares two or more treatments. In some CER studies, researchers use patient data from electronic health records, or EHRs, to compare treatments. But patient traits like age may affect doctors' and patients' choice of treatments, which can bias results. Using EHR systems to identify eligible patients and assign them to treatments by chance could improve results of CER studies that use EHR data.
In this study, the research team explored the views of patients, clinic staff, and clinicians, such as doctors or nurses, on doing CER studies in clinics. The team also tested software with a widely used EHR system. The software finds patients who qualify for a study. During a clinic visit, the software prompts doctors to invite patients to take part in the study. If patients agree, the software assigns patients by chance to a treatment.
Retail Sweep Programs and Bank Reserves (ICPSR 1236)
School Crime Operations Package (School COP Software) (ICPSR 23543)
The School Crime Operations Package (School COP) is a software application developed by Abt Associates Inc. with funding from the National Institute of Justice. School COP is a free software package that persons responsible for school safety can use to enter, analyze, and map criminal incidents and school rule violations that occur in and around K-12 schools. School COP organizes information according to the data model that the United States Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics' Crime, Violence, and Discipline Reporting Task Force recommends. The School COP database includes data related to the incident (e.g., date, time, type, location) and to persons involved in the incident (e.g., name, grade, action taken). In other words, School COP is an incident-based system, rather than a student-based system. School COP offers a variety of techniques for analyzing school incidents, including tabular reports, bar graphs, pie charts, and maps. School COP can be installed on any Windows (95 or later) PC. It requires no other software to run, and is usable without formal training.
The origin of this project is an award to Abt Associates Inc. that was funded under the National Institute of Justice's (NIJ) June 1999 "Safe Schools Technology" solicitation, which requested proposals for innovative approaches to using technology to enhance the safety of our nation's elementary and secondary schools. School COP was initially released on CD-ROM in January 2001, and made available at the School COP Web site in June 2001. This Windows version of School COP was generally designed for individuals, for a single school, or for small offices within a school district. Abt Associates Inc. was subsequently awarded another grant in 2001 to enhance the School Crime Operations Package (School COP) and to conduct an evaluation of this software, which is used to enter and analyze incidents that occur on school campuses.
Two types of enhancements were made. First, an enhanced Windows version of School COP was developed that could run on a local- or wide-area network, thus allowing multiple users within a single school or across multiple schools to share a common School COP database. The enhanced Windows version also included two utilities: a Merge application (which enables a district-level School COP database to be constructed by merging several individual databases) and a Viewer application (which enables users to view -- but not add, edit, or delete -- incident information). Second, Web School COP was developed to meet the diverse information needs of persons charged with maintaining safe schools in large school districts, including persons at the school-level (e.g., principals, assistant principals, security officers, and school resource officers), the district-level (e.g., district-level administrators and security staff), as well as possibly parent organizations and state-level administrators. Web School COP was designed to run on either an Intranet (e.g., the school district's private Internet) or a secure third-party Web server, and was built to run on the current Microsoft Web platform.
The evaluation of School COP entailed case studies of six sites to address three main issues: (1) what decision process do sites go through when deciding whether to use School COP, (2) once the site decides to use School COP, what implementation obstacles exist, including those related to installation, customization, and training, and (3) what benefits do sites realize from using School COP.