Search results

Search tips
Showing 1 – 50 of 139 results.
Self-published

Cycling cities: Mode choice, car congestion, and urban structure - code repository (YJUEC-D-24-00337) (ICPSR 244292)

Released/updated on: 2026-01-20
Cycling as a mode of commuting has gained popularity in cities worldwide. This study examines the impact of cycling on the urban spatial structure and welfare through the development of a quantitative spatial equilibrium model that incorporates mode choice and car congestion. We apply this model to the Netherlands, which is known for its extensive cycling infrastructure. Eliminating cycling increases commuting times and distances by 15% and 30%, exacerbates car congestion, and results in a significant reduction in worker welfare. We also show that removing dedicated cycleways leads to similar, although less pronounced, changes in the spatial economy. 
Self-published

Real-Time Population Survey (ICPSR 158081)

Released/updated on: 2025-05-22
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2020-04-01--2024-06-30
The Real-Time Population Survey (RPS) is a national labor market survey of US adults aged 18-64 following the core questionnaire of the Current Population Survey (CPS), supplemented with additional questions (e.g., about commuting behavior and employer tenure). Separate waves of the survey were conducted each month between April 2020 and June 2021. Since then the RPS has been run two to three times per year.
Curated
Partially restricted
Simple Crosstabs

Chitwan Valley Family Study: Changing Social Contexts and Family Formation, Nepal, 1995-2019 (ICPSR 4538)

Released/updated on: 2024-10-16
Geographic coverage: Nepal
Time period: 1995-01-01--2019-12-31

The Chitwan Valley Family Study (CVFS) is a comprehensive family panel study of individuals, households, and communities in the Chitwan Valley of Nepal. The study was initially designed to investigate the influence of changing community and household contexts on population outcomes such as marital and childbearing processes. Over time, the goals of the study expanded to investigate family dynamics, intergenerational influences, child health, migration, labor force participation, attitudes and beliefs, mental health, agricultural production, environmental change, and many other topics. The data include full life histories for more than 10,000 individuals, tracking and interviews with all migrants, continuous measurement of community change, over 25 years of demographic event registry, and many other data collections. For additional information regarding the Chitwan Valley Family Study, please visit the Chitwan Valley Family Study Website. A Data Guide for this study is available as a web page and for download.

Principal Investigators

  • William G. Axinn, University of Michigan
  • Dirgha Ghimire, University of Michigan
  • Jordan Smoller, Massachusetts General Hospital
Curated
Partially restricted

Massachusetts Nursing Profession Entrants Survey, 1988 (ICPSR 9520)

Released/updated on: 2024-02-14
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 1988-07-01--1988-07-31
The purpose of this survey was to gather information to assist educators, administrators, and policymakers in the development of strategies for the recruitment and retention of registered nurses. To that end, nurses taking the Massachusetts licensure exam were queried about their reasons for going into nursing, their nursing career goals, their attitudes toward the nursing profession, their preferences for various branches of the nursing profession, and the importance they placed on various aspects of work in general, e.g., job security, high income, and good opportunities for advancement. Respondents were also questioned about their job searches and their current or impending jobs: how the job was found, number of applications filled out and offers received, number of hours usually worked, earnings, type of medical facility, shift usually worked and preferred, commuting distances, public transportation and child care needs, whether student clinical experience was obtained with the employer, planned length of stay at the job, and the importance of various factors that attracted them to the position, such as the attractiveness of the town or city where the job was located, salary and benefit levels, availability of parking and child care, and job flexibility. In addition, the survey asked respondents how and when they decided to become nurses, how they found out about educational options in nursing, how much basic nursing education they received and how it was financed, which factors attracted them to the schools from which they graduated, and how much of their basic nursing education was devoted to clinical experience. Background information on respondents includes age, sex, citizenship, race, ethnic group, marital status, education, education goals, family income, number and ages of related persons living in the household, usage of child care and elderly care services, parents' education and occupations, and mother's employment status at various stages of the respondent's childhood and adolescence.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

East Asian Social Survey (EASS), Cross-National Survey Data Sets: Work Life in East Asia, 2015 (ICPSR 38160)

Released/updated on: 2022-03-22
Geographic coverage: Asia, Japan, Taiwan, China (Peoples Republic), Global
Time period: 2015-01-01--2015-12-31

The East Asian Social Survey (EASS) is a biennial social survey project that serves as a cross-national network of the following four General Social Survey type surveys in East Asia: Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS), and comparatively examines diverse aspects of social life in these regions. Since its 1st module survey in 2006, EASS produces and disseminates its module survey datasets and this is the harmonized data for the 4th module survey, called 'Work Life in East Asia,' which was carried out during 2015 in China, Japan, and Taiwan.

Survey information in this module focuses on work related issues such as equity at work place, work orientation, and work-family balance. Additionally, respondents were asked about global economic crisis, social disparity and mobility as well as entrepreneurship.

Demographic information specific to the respondent and their spouse includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status and hours worked, occupation, earnings and income, religion, class, size of community, and region.

External data

American Housing Survey (AHS) - Table Creator (ICPSR 36753)

Released/updated on: 2017-03-31
Geographic coverage: United States

The American Housing Survey (AHS), the most comprehensive housing survey in the U.S., provides up-to-date information on the size and composition of the housing stock in our country. This survey delivers information about the types of homes in which people are now living and the characteristics of these homes, as well as the costs of running and maintaining them. National data are collected every other year and metropolitan area data are collected on a rotating basis. The AHS is sponsored by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau.

The AHS Table Creator gives data users the ability to create customized tables from the AHS data without having to use the Public Use File (microdata).

Like the microdata, the AHS Table Creator provides current information on a wide range of housing subjects, including size and composition of the nation's housing inventory, vacancies, fuel usage, physical condition of housing units, characteristics of occupants, equipment breakdowns, home improvements, mortgages and other housing costs, people eligible for and beneficiaries of subsidized housing, home values, and characteristics of recent movers.

For the first time since 1985, the survey selected new national and metropolitan area longitudinal samples. In addition to the "core" data, the AHS collected "topical" data using a series of topical modules. The 2015 AHS includes topical supplements on 1) the presence of arts and cultural opportunities in the community, 2) health and safety hazards in the home, 3) food insecurity, and 4) the use of housing counseling services. Data users can also explore the new national and metropolitan area longitudinal samples as well as the topical supplements using the AHS Table Creator.

Policy analysts, program managers, budget analysts, and Congressional staff use the AHS data and table creator to monitor supply and demand, as well as changes in housing conditions and costs, in order to assess housing needs. Analyses based on the AHS are used to advise the executive and legislative branches in the development of housing policies. HUD uses the AHS to improve efficiency and effectiveness and design housing programs appropriate for different target groups, such as first-time home buyers and the elderly. Academic researchers and private organizations also use AHS data in efforts of specific interest and concern to their respective communities.

The AHS is conducted every two years from May and September in odd-numbered years. HUD sometimes adjusts this schedule and/or sample depending on budget constraints. Public use microdata and reports are released approximately 12 months after data collection.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2012 (ICPSR 36577)

Released/updated on: 2016-10-21
Geographic coverage: Asia, Japan, Global
Time period: 2012-02-24--2012-04-22
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes, and behaviors, which make possible international comparisons. Respondents were asked about employment, family and household composition, education, entertainment, technology and Internet usage, status and opinions on mental and physical health, alcohol and tobacco use, life satisfaction, voting behavior, opinions on political and social issues, taxes and government expenditure, family beliefs and issues, impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake, trust in people and institutions, membership in organizations, and their neighborhood environment. Demographic questions included age, sex, marital status, household income, and religious orientation and behavior.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2009: New Orleans Data (ICPSR 30943)

Released/updated on: 2016-04-18
Geographic coverage: United States, Louisiana, New Orleans
Time period: 2009-01-01--2009-12-31

This data collection is part of the American Housing Metropolitan Survey (AHS-MS, or "metro") which is conducted in odd-numbered years. It cycles through a set of 21 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every six years. The metro survey, like the national survey, is longitudinal. This particular survey provides information on the characteristics of a New Orleans metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units in 2009. The data are presented in eight separate parts: Part 1, Home Improvement Record, Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages Recorded, Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner of Rental Units Record, Part 6, Person Record, Part 7, High Burden Unit Record, and Part 8, Recent Mover Groups Record.

Part 1 data include questions about upgrades and remodeling, cost of alterations and repairs, as well as the household member who performed the alteration/repair. Part 2 data include journey to work or commuting information, such as method of transportation to work, length of trip, and miles traveled to work. Additional information collected covers number of hours worked at home, number of days worked at home, average time respondent leaves for work in the morning or evening, whether respondent drives to work alone or with others, and a few other questions pertaining to self-employment and work schedule. Part 3 data include mortgage information, such as type of mortgage obtained by respondent, amount and term of mortgages, as well as years needed to pay them off. Other items asked include monthly payment amount, reason mortgage was taken out, and who provided the mortgage. Part 4 data include household-level information, including demographic information, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. The following topics are also included: data recodes, unit characteristics, and weighting information.

Part 5 data include information pertaining to owners of rental properties and whether the owner/resident manager lives on-site. Part 6 data include individual person level information, in which respondents were queried on basic demographic information (i.e. age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder), as well as if they worked at all last week, month and year moved into residence, and their ability to perform everyday tasks and whether they have difficulty hearing, seeing, and concentrating or remembering things. Part 7 data include verification of income to cost when the ratio of income to cost is outside of certain tolerances. Respondents were asked whether they receive help or assistance with grocery bills, clothing and transportation expenses, child care payments, medical and utility bills, as well as with rent payments. Part 8 data include recent mover information, such as how many people were living in last unit before move, whether last residence was a condo or a co-op, as well as whether this residence was outside of the United States.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2009: Seattle Data (ICPSR 30942)

Released/updated on: 2016-03-21
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 2009-01-01--2009-12-31

This data collection is part of the American Housing Metropolitan Survey (AHS-MS, or "metro") which is conducted in odd-numbered years. It cycles through a set of 21 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every six years. The metro survey, like the national survey, is longitudinal. This particular survey provides information on the characteristics of a Seattle metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units in 2009. The data are presented in eight separate parts: Part 1, Home Improvement Record, Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages Recorded, Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner of Rental Units Record, Part 6, Person Record, Part 7, High Burden Unit Record, and Part 8, Recent Mover Groups Record.

Part 1 data include questions about upgrades and remodeling, cost of alterations and repairs, as well as the household member who performed the alteration/repair. Part 2 data include journey to work or commuting information, such as method of transportation to work, length of trip, and miles traveled to work. Additional information collected covers number of hours worked at home, number of days worked at home, average time respondent leaves for work in the morning or evening, whether respondent drives to work alone or with others, and a few other questions pertaining to self-employment and work schedule. Part 3 data include mortgage information, such as type of mortgage obtained by respondent, amount and term of mortgages, as well as years needed to pay them off. Other items asked include monthly payment amount, reason mortgage was taken out, and who provided the mortgage. Part 4 data include household-level information, including demographic information, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. The following topics are also included: data recodes, unit characteristics, and weighting information.

Part 5 data include information pertaining to owners of rental properties and whether the owner/resident manager lives on-site. Part 6 data include individual person level information, in which respondents were queried on basic demographic information (i.e. age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder), as well as if they worked at all last week, month and year moved into residence, and their ability to perform everyday tasks and whether they have difficulty hearing, seeing, and concentrating or remembering things. Part 7 data include verification of income to cost when the ratio of income to cost is outside of certain tolerances. Respondents were asked whether they receive help or assistance with grocery bills, clothing and transportation expenses, child care payments, medical and utility bills, as well as with rent payments. Part 8 data include recent mover information, such as how many people were living in last unit before move, whether last residence was a condo or a co-op, as well as whether this residence was outside of the United States.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

American Housing Survey, 2009: National Microdata (ICPSR 30941)

Released/updated on: 2016-03-10
Geographic coverage: United States
Time period: 2009-01-01--2009-12-31

This data collection provides information on the characteristics of a national sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units in 2009. The data are presented in eight separate parts: Part 1, Home Improvement Record, Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages Recorded, Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner of Rental Units Record, Part 6, Person Record, Part 7, High Burden Unit Record, and Part 8, Recent Mover Groups Record.

Part 1 data include questions about upgrades and remodeling, cost of alterations and repairs, as well as the household member who performed the alteration/repair. Part 2 data include journey to work or commuting information, such as method of transportation to work, length of trip, and miles traveled to work. Additional information collected covers number of hours worked at home, number of days worked at home, average time respondent leaves for work in the morning or evening, whether respondent drives to work alone or with others, and a few other questions pertaining to self-employment and work schedule. Part 3 data include mortgage information, such as type of mortgage obtained by respondent, amount and term of mortgages, as well as years needed to pay them off. Other items asked include monthly payment amount, reason mortgage was taken out, and who provided the mortgage. Part 4 data include household-level information, including demographic information, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. The following topics are also included: data recodes, unit characteristics, and weighting information.

Part 5 data include information pertaining to owners of rental properties and whether the owner/resident manager lives on-site. Part 6 data include individual person level information, in which respondents were queried on basic demographic information (i.e. age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder), as well as if they worked at all last week, month and year moved into residence, and their ability to perform everyday tasks and whether they have difficulty hearing, seeing, and concentrating or remembering things. Part 7 data include verification of income to cost when the ratio of income to cost is outside of certain tolerances. Respondents were asked whether they receive help or assistance with grocery bills, clothing and transportation expenses, child care payments, medical and utility bills, as well as with rent payments. Part 8 data include recent mover information, such as how many people were living in last unit before move, whether last residence was a condo or a co-op, as well as whether this residence was outside of the United States.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2010 (ICPSR 34623)

Released/updated on: 2015-07-22
Geographic coverage: Asia, Japan, Global
Time period: 2010-02-19--2010-04-24
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes, and behaviors, which makes possible international comparisons. Respondents were asked about employment, family and household composition, education, entertainment, technology and Internet usage, status and opinions on mental and physical health, alcohol and tobacco use, life satisfaction, addiction, proficiency with English, voting behavior, opinions on political and social issues, taxes and government expenditure, views on burial, family beliefs and issues, trust in people and institutions, membership in organizations, volunteering, perception of their personal appearance, receiving help from others, and their neighborhood environment. Demographic questions included age, sex, marital status, household income, and religious orientation and behavior.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2008 (ICPSR 30661)

Released/updated on: 2015-07-21
Geographic coverage: Asia, Japan, Global
Time period: 2008-01-01--2008-12-31
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes and behaviors which make international comparisons possible. The objectives of the JGSS project are three-fold: (1) to collect and build cumulative data on general social surveys in Japan in a regular and consistent manner, thus enabling a time-series analysis; (2) to provide data for secondary analyses to researchers and university students in various social science fields; and (3) to provide data in a format useful for international comparative studies, research, and reports.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

New York, New Jersey, Connecticut Regional Travel - Household Interview Survey (RT-HIS), 1997-1998 (ICPSR 35294)

Released/updated on: 2015-03-06
Geographic coverage: New York City, United States, Connecticut, New York (state), New Jersey
Time period: 1997-02-01--1998-05-31

The New York, New Jersey, Connecticut Regional Travel - Household Interview Survey (RT-HIS), 1997-1998, was sponsored by the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) and the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA). The survey was conducted from February 1997 through May 1998, and relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel over a designated 24-hour period. Random recruitment of households was conducted by a telephone recruitment interview in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose, and the obligation of respondents to complete travel diaries. Data on households and household members were also collected during the recruitment interview. Participating households were assigned a specific travel day, which typically occurred 10 days after recruitment; each household member was asked to record travel information in a travel diary for the specified 24-hour period. Immediately after the assigned date, households were contacted by telephone to retrieve the diary information. In total, 14,441 households were recruited to participate in the study. Of these, 11,264 households completed travel diaries. Travel information was retrieved from all household members regardless of age, and has been compiled into five public-use data files:

  1. The Household file includes demographic information pertaining to the household, such as county of residence, household size, dwelling type, home ownership status, tenure, dominant language, telephone ownership, ethnicity, and income;
  2. The Person file contains demographic information pertaining to individual household members, including age, gender, relationship, employment status, student status, disability status, and licensed driver status;
  3. The Vehicle file features information about all household vehicles, including the number of vehicles, vehicle year, vehicle type, and whether each vehicle is owned or leased;
  4. The Trip file contains all travel day data, including information on places visited, arrival and departure times, activities at each destination, travel mode, parking costs, and detailed transit information;
  5. The Location file includes information about each location visited by household members, such as location type, census tracts, and geocoding status data.

Additionally, data producers developed Household, Person, and Trip analysis data files; these files comprise parts 6 through 8, and contain the RT-HIS weight variables.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Evaluation of Camera Use to Prevent Crime in Commuter Parking Facilities within the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Parking Facilities, 2004-2009 (ICPSR 32521)

Released/updated on: 2015-02-27
Geographic coverage: District of Columbia
Time period: 2004-01-01--2010-12-31

This study sought to identify what parking facility characteristics and management practices within the Washington Metro Transit Police (MTP) might create opportunities for crime, analyze those findings in relation to past crimes, and identify promising crime reduction strategies. The project consisted of three main research components: (1) identification of the magnitude of car crime in commuter parking facilities and possible strategies for prevention of such car crime; (2) identification and implementation of a crime prevention strategy; and (3) evaluation of the strategy's effectiveness.

In partnership with the MTP staff, the research team created a blocked randomized experimental design involving 50 matched pairs of commuter parking facilities in which a combination of live and dummy digital cameras were deployed, along with accompanying signage, at the exits of one randomly selected facility from each pairing. After a period of 12 months following camera implementation, the research team analyzed the impact of the cameras on crime occurring in and around Metro's parking facilities.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Bay Area Travel Survey, 1990 (ICPSR 34796)

Released/updated on: 2015-01-19
Geographic coverage: San Francisco, United States, California, Oakland, San Jose
Time period: 1990-01-01--1990-12-31
The 1990 Bay Area Travel Survey sampled households in California's nine-county Bay Area (including the cities of San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose) in order to collect detailed travel data regarding residents' driving habits and public transit use. Potential respondents were identified via computer generated random telephone sampling; willing participants were tasked with completing a mailed travel diary for each household member over the age of 5 for an assigned "typical weekday" of travel activity. Respondents recorded details of their movement throughout the day, including trip locations, mode of transportation, bridges traversed, public transit routes, trip start and end times, trip purpose, trip activities, number of passengers, and cost of transit fare and/or parking. Following the assigned travel day, a second call was placed to each respondent in order collect the travel diary data. Demographic information for individuals and households includes gender, age, driver's license status, ethnicity, employment status, occupation, household size, and income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Household Activity Survey Analysis Report, 2006 (ICPSR 35350)

Released/updated on: 2014-10-07
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 2006-01-01--2006-12-31
The PSRC Household Activity Survey Analysis Report, 2006 was conducted to provide regional data for the Puget Sound Region travel demand models; the assessment of current activity and travel patterns; the evaluation of attitudes, preferences, and choices with respect to travel; and the estimation of future activity and travel within the region. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 6, 1996 (ICPSR 34913)

Released/updated on: 2014-09-24
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1996-01-01--1996-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 6, 1996 is the sixth wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council); wave 6 was conducted during the second and third quarters of 1996. This collection contains the sixth set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 9, 2000 (ICPSR 34916)

Released/updated on: 2014-09-15
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 2000-01-01--2000-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 9, 2000 is the ninth wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council); Wave 9 was conducted in 2000. This collection contains the ninth set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households need to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 8, 1999 (ICPSR 34915)

Released/updated on: 2014-09-04
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1999-01-01--1999-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 8, 1999 is the eighth wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council); wave 8 was conducted in 1999. This collection contains the eighth set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 10, 2002 (ICPSR 34917)

Released/updated on: 2014-08-29
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 2002-10-01--2003-02-28
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 10, 2002 is the tenth wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council. This collection contains the tenth set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

OMPO Model Development Project (Oahu Island, 1995) (ICPSR 35291)

Released/updated on: 2014-08-14
Geographic coverage: United States, Hawaii, Oahu
Time period: 1995-01-01--1995-12-31
The 1995 Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization Model Development Project for Oahu Island was intended to document how Oahu residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the region. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Ohio Statewide Household Travel Survey, 2001-2003 (ICPSR 34912)

Released/updated on: 2014-08-12
Geographic coverage: Akron, Mansfield, Youngstown, United States, Lima, Ohio, Toledo, Canton, Dayton, Springfield (Ohio), Steubenville
Time period: 2001-08-01--2003-05-31
The 2001-2003 Ohio Statewide Household Travel Survey is a comprehensive study of the demographic and average weekday, local and regional personal travel made by residents of Ohio. This survey entailed the collection of activity and travel information for all household members. The survey relied on the willingness of regional households to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members and its vehicles and (2) have all household members record all travel and activity for the travel period, including address information for all locations visited, trip purpose, mode, and travel times. Demographic information includes age, gender, valid driver's license, occupation, student status, number of people in the household, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

2002 Champaign-Urbana-Savoy Travel Survey (ICPSR 35263)

Released/updated on: 2014-08-05
Geographic coverage: United States, Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
Time period: 2002-01-01--2002-12-31
The 2002 Champaign-Urbana-Savoy Travel Survey is a comprehensive study of the demographic and average weekday, local and regional personal travel made by residents of the Champaign-Urbana-Savoy urbanized area. This survey entailed the collection of activity and travel information for all household members. The survey relied on the willingness of regional households to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members and its vehicles and (2) have all household members record all travel and activity for the travel period, including address information for all locations visited, trip purpose, mode, and travel times. Demographic information includes household size, household income, employment status, and student status.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Chicago Regional Household Travel Inventory, 2007 (ICPSR 34910)

Released/updated on: 2014-08-04
Geographic coverage: United States, Chicago, Illinois
Time period: 2007-01-01--2008-03-31
The 2007 Chicago Regional Household Travel Inventory (CRHTI) is a comprehensive study of the demographic and travel behavior characteristics of residents in the greater Chicago area. This survey entailed the collection of activity and travel information for all household members regardless of age during a randomly assigned 24-hour or 48-hour period. The survey relied on the willingness of regional households to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members and its vehicles and (2) have all household members record all travel and activity for the travel period, including address information for all locations visited, trip purpose, mode, and travel times. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, and whether respondents had a valid drivers license at the time of the survey.
Curated

Anchorage Household Travel Survey, 2002 (ICPSR 26682)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: United States, Alaska, Anchorage
Time period: 2002-02-01--2002-02-28, 2002-04-01--2002-05-31
The 2002 Household Travel Survey for the municipality of Anchorage, Alaska entailed the collection of activity and travel information for household members during a specific 24-hour period. In addition to providing basic information about each household and its members, the survey documented specific characteristics of activities and trips made, including number and purpose of trips, time of day, and mode of transportation. Travel days for the survey were spread across the pilot study (February 12-15, 2002) and the full study (April 1, 2002 -- May 17, 2002). In total, 2,035 households were recruited to participate in the study. Of these, 1,293 completed travel diaries, and the information was retrieved from all household members age 5 and older. The 1,293 completed surveys included an over sample of 242 households in the Eagle River and Chugiak communities. These numbers do not include an intercept sample of 174 users of the People Mover.
Curated

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 7, 1997 (ICPSR 34914)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1997-01-01--1997-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 7, 1997, is the seventh wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey initiated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council) to assess the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. This collection contains the seventh set of panel data for approximately 1,700 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989 (ICPSR 34772)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1989-09-01--1989-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989, is the first wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey initiated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council) to assess the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. This collection contains the first set of panel data for 1,687 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each subsequent survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated

Maricopa Regional Household Travel Survey, 2002 (ICPSR 35264)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: United States, Phoenix, Arizona
Time period: 2002-02-01--2002-12-31
The Maricopa Regional Household Travel Survey, 2002, conducted by NuStats, in collaboration with the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), was initiated to assess the travel patterns of households in the metropolitan region of Phoenix, Arizona. This collection contains data for 4,018 households in Maricopa County, and a small portion of Pinal County. Household recruitment for the study was conducted through the use of a "recruitment interview", in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose, and the obligation of all household members to complete the survey. Information regarding the household and its members was also collected during the recruitment interview. Participating households were assigned a specific "travel period" or 48-hour period on which to record their travel and activities, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, ethnicity, language, disability, education level, occupation, and household income.
Curated

St. Louis Household Travel Survey, 2002 (ICPSR 35265)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: United States, Illinois, Missouri, St. Louis
Time period: 2002-04-01--2002-05-31, 2002-09-01--2002-12-31
The St. Louis Household Travel Survey, 2002, entailed the collection of weekday travel behavior characteristics of households residing in each of the eight counties that comprise the St. Louis region. In addition to collecting basic demographic and socioeconomic information about each household and its members, the survey documented specific characteristics of activities and trips made, including number and purpose of trips, trip duration, time of day, mode of transportation, and specifics of school and work-related travel. The survey instruments contained three components: (1) the recruitment questionnaire, (2) the travel log, and (3) the retrieval questionnaire. In total, 7,046 households were recruited to participate in the study via telephone interview. Of these 5,094 completed travel logs during a specific 24-hour period, and the information was retrieved from all household members, regardless of age. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education level, employment status, and household income.
Curated

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 3, 1992 (ICPSR 35266)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-16
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1992-01-01--1992-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 3, 1992, is the third wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey initiated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council) to assess the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. This collection contains the third set of panel data for approximately 1,700 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated

Atlanta Household Travel Survey, 2001 (ICPSR 34389)

Released/updated on: 2014-07-15
Geographic coverage: United States, Atlanta, Georgia
Time period: 2001-04-01--2002-04-30
The Atlanta Household Travel Survey sampled 8,069 households in the thirteen-county metropolitan Atlanta region. The survey relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of all travel for a 48-hour period. Household recruitment for the study was conducted through the use of a recruitment interview, in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose, and the obligation of all household members to complete the survey. The 8,069 participating households, when weighted, represent 21,323 persons, 14,449 vehicles, and 126,127 places visited during the 48-hour travel period. Data were collected on trip generation, trip distribution, modal choice, transit use, neighborhood preferences, and trip activities. Household data includes demographic information such as household size, household vehicles, dwelling type, home ownership status, tenure, and computer ownership. Also included are summary statistics regarding the number of workers, students, and trips made during the 48-hour travel period. Person data includes demographic information about the household members, student data, employment data for first and second jobs, and health related information.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

East Tennessee Household Travel Survey, 2008 (ICPSR 34736)

Released/updated on: 2014-02-27
Geographic coverage: Knoxville, United States, Tennessee
Time period: 2008-02-01--2008-05-31
The 2008 East Tennessee Household Travel Survey is a comprehensive study of travel behavior in Knox, Blount, Anderson, Jefferson, Loudon, Roane, Sevier, and Union counties. Respondents were asked to report detailed information regarding their travel during a specified 24-hour period, including trip locations, mode of transportation, trip start and end times, trip purpose, and trip activities. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, whether the respondent was a student, household income, education level, ethnicity, and whether the respondent had a disability.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Volusia County Metropolitan Planning Organization (VCMPO) Model Calibration and Home Based Travel Survey, 2001-2002 (ICPSR 34909)

Released/updated on: 2014-02-21
Geographic coverage: United States, Florida
Time period: 2001-11-07--2002-02-28
The 2001-2002 Model Calibration and Home Based Travel Survey was a study conducted in Volusia County, Florida to investigate the travel habits and patterns of residents of the county. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 48-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. This data collection contains seven datasets: (1) a master data file, (2) a household characteristics data file, (3) a household member characteristics data file, (4) a household trips data file, (5) a data file containing the results of a survey given to public transportation users in the county, (6) a household weighting file, and (7) a household member weighting file. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number and type of vehicles available to household members, household income, and whether respondents had a valid driver's license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

St. Louis Region Small Sample Travel Survey, 1990 (ICPSR 34787)

Released/updated on: 2013-12-19
Geographic coverage: United States, Missouri, St. Louis
Time period: 1990-08-27--1990-11-18
The 1990 St. Louis Region Small Sample Travel Survey was a home interview survey conducted in the city of St. Louis, St. Louis County, and parts of Jefferson County, Madison County, St. Clair County, Monroe County, and St. Charles County in Missouri. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children under five years old in the household, household income, and whether respondents had a valid driver's license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) Household-Based Person Trip Survey, 1994 (ICPSR 34911)

Released/updated on: 2013-12-16
Geographic coverage: Detroit, United States, Michigan
Time period: 1994-02-23--1994-06-10
The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the southeast region of Michigan. This region encompasses the counties of Oakland, Macomb, Monroe, Livingston, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne (including the City of Detroit). Created in 1968, SEMCOG's planning responsibilities include the collection and maintenance of a comprehensive transportation, demographic, environmental, and economic development database for advancing regional policies and plans, and review and approval of applications for federal transportation funds. The 1994 survey was undertaken to provide SEMCOG with new travel behavior data to assist in updating the region's transportation models. This data collection includes socioeconomic, travel, and mobile source emissions models for projecting future patterns of development, travel, congestion, and air pollution. Information about household characteristics and travel was collected using a one-day, activity-focused diary and a separate household survey. In an activity diary, respondents were asked about each activity they undertook during the day. Travel was assessed as the process of getting from one activity to another. Therefore, the trips reported in this document were generated by pairing activities to form a trip origin and destination. Demographic information includes age, gender, number and age of children, school enrollment status, employment status, occupation, household income, and type of household dwelling.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

1988/1989 Maricopa Household Travel Study (ICPSR 34743)

Released/updated on: 2013-11-26
Geographic coverage: United States, Phoenix, Arizona
Time period: 1988-10-08--1989-02-20
The 1988/1989 Maricopa Household Travel Study was intended to document how residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the Phoenix Metropolitan area. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children over five years old in the household, household income, and whether respondents had a valid drivers license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Chicago Area Transportation Survey (CATS) 1990 Household Travel Survey (ICPSR 34908)

Released/updated on: 2013-11-01
Geographic coverage: United States, Chicago, Illinois
Time period: 1988-01-01--1991-12-31
The purpose of the 1990 Chicago Area Transportation Survey (CATS) was to survey households in the area surrounding Chicago to collect information on travel in the area. Respondents were asked to report detailed information regarding their travel, including trip locations, mode of transportation, trip start and end times, trip purpose, and trip activities. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, occupation, whether the respondent was a student, and income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Southeast Florida Regional Travel Characteristics Study (Travel 2000) (ICPSR 34701)

Released/updated on: 2013-10-10
Geographic coverage: United States, Florida
Time period: 1998-12-01--1999-09-30
The Southeast Florida Regional Travel Characteristics Study (Travel 2000) was intended to document how Southeastern Florida residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the region. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children in the household, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, and whether respondents had a valid drivers license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

California Statewide Household Travel Survey, 2000-2001 (ICPSR 34677)

Released/updated on: 2013-09-26
Geographic coverage: United States, California
Time period: 2000-10-01--2001-12-31
The California Statewide Household Travel Survey, 2000-2001 was conducted in all 58 counties in California. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for either a 24- or 48-hour period. They were also asked to report detailed information regarding their trips, including trip times, mode of transportation, trip activities, trip origin, and trip destination. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, vehicle ownership, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, type of housing unit, and whether respondents had a valid driver's license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Bay Area Travel Survey, 2000 (ICPSR 34805)

Released/updated on: 2013-09-12
Geographic coverage: San Francisco, United States, California
Time period: 2000-02-20--2001-02-05
The 2000 Bay Area Travel Survey collected travel information from residents of the nine-county Bay Area for weekday and weekend travel both inside and outside of the region. This survey varies from other household travel surveys in that selected households were asked to record all of their activities for a specific two-day period, rather than complete a 24-hour travel log. Respondents were asked to report detailed information regarding their travel, including trip locations, mode of transportation, trip start and end times, trip purpose, and trip activities. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, occupation, whether the respondent was a student, income, education level, ethnicity, and whether the respondent had a disability.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 2000 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey, 2001) (ICPSR 34744)

Released/updated on: 2013-09-06
Geographic coverage: Minneapolis, United States, St. Paul, Minnesota
Time period: 2001-04-01--2001-09-30
The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 2000 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey, 2001) was intended to document how Twin Cities residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the region. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children under five years old in the household, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, and whether respondents had a valid driver's license at the time of the survey.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel Survey (ICPSR 34777)

Released/updated on: 2013-09-06
Geographic coverage: Sacramento, United States, California
Time period: 2000-02-01--2000-06-30
The 2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel Survey, like all recent household travel surveys, relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel for a specified day. During their travel day, participating household members were asked to record travel information in a travel diary for the specified 24-hour period. The information documented by respondents includes trip activities, mode of transportation, trip times, and trip location. Demographic information includes gender, age, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, whether the respondent was a student, employment status, household income, whether the respondent owned or rented a home, and household size.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 5, 1994 (ICPSR 34806)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-30
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1994-01-01--1994-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 5, 1994 is the fifth wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington state. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council); wave 5 was conducted in 1994. This collection contains the fifth set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households need to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Bay Area Travel Study, 1996 (ICPSR 34797)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-22
Geographic coverage: San Francisco, United States, California
Time period: 1996-01-01--1996-12-31
The purpose of the 1996 Bay Area Travel Study was to survey households in California's nine county Bay Area (including Oakland, San Francisco, and San Jose) to collect information on activities and travel in the area. This study focused on households who used the Bay Bridge corridor, either by driving or using transit. The 1996 Bay Area Travel Study varies from other household travel surveys in that households were asked to record all of their activities for a specific two-day period, rather than complete a 24-hour travel log. Respondents were asked to report detailed information regarding their travel, including trip locations, mode of transportation, trip start and end times, trip purpose, and trip activities. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, occupation, whether the respondent was a student, income, education level, ethnicity, whether the respondent had a disability, and whether the respondent was a volunteer.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Baltimore Travel Survey, 1977 (ICPSR 34418)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-20
Geographic coverage: Baltimore, United States, Maryland
Time period: 1977-05-01--1977-06-30
The Baltimore Travel Survey, 1977, is a comprehensive collection of demographic characteristics and travel patterns for 967 households in Baltimore, Maryland. The survey was conducted in May and June of 1977; survey results have been maintained and distributed by the United States Federal Highway Administration. Survey participants were asked to provide detailed household information, including length of residency at current address, number of household occupants, type of dwelling unit, number of vehicles available to household occupants, and the body type of each vehicle. Respondents were also asked to provide information on their travel behavior during a 24-hour assessment period, including trip duration and frequency, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, mode of transportation, number of passengers, and parking cost. Demographic information for this collection includes age, sex, disability, race, spoken language, marital status, income, and educational attainment.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Tahoe Regional Household Travel Survey, 2005 (ICPSR 34737)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-20
Geographic coverage: United States, California, Nevada
Time period: 2005-06-01--2005-09-30
The Tahoe Regional Household Travel Survey, 2005, is a comprehensive survey of the travel patterns of households in the Tahoe basin region of California and Nevada. The survey was conducted for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) over a four-month period, from June through September 2005. This collection contains 2 sets of travel data: (1) a survey of 1,220 permanent households within the Tahoe basin region, and (2) a subset survey of 125 seasonal households within the same area. The permanent resident dataset contains information about 2,732 household members, 2,471 vehicles, and details regarding 11,048 trips made during a 24-hour period; the seasonal resident subset features 726 trip observations and information about 229 household members and 185 vehicles. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, and (2) document all travel for each household member, regardless of age, over an assigned 24-hour period. During the recruitment phase, respondents were asked to provide detailed household information, including permanent or seasonal resident status, number of household occupants, type of dwelling unit, number of vehicles available to household members, as well as the year, body type, and fuel type of each vehicle. Survey participants received mailed travel logs to aid in documenting travel information for the 24-hour assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, activities at each trip destination, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, income, education, and employment status.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 2, 1990 (ICPSR 34784)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-20
Geographic coverage: Seattle, United States, Washington
Time period: 1990-01-01--1990-12-31
The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 2, 1990, is the second wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey of the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. The survey series was initiated in 1989 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council); wave 2 was conducted in 1990. This collection contains the second set of panel data for approximately 2,000 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking cost. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Transportation for the 21st Century Household Travel Survey (Philadelphia, 2000) (ICPSR 34759)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-13
Geographic coverage: United States, Delaware, New Jersey, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Time period: 2000-03-01--2000-12-31
Household travel surveys such as the Transportation for the 21st Century Household Travel Survey (Philadelphia 2000) are used to obtain information about work and non-work trip generation, trip distribution, modal choice, and traffic assignment as well as to obtain data on average vehicle occupancy. The study area for this travel survey consisted of the Pennsylvania counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia (along with a small portion of Berks County); the New Jersey Delaware Valley counties of Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer; and the South Jersey counties of Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem. The resultant data set contains demographic and travel data on 5,677 households in the 14-county study area. Of the 5,677 households that participated in the study, 2,666 were from the Delaware Valley region of Pennsylvania, 1,551 were from the Delaware Valley region of New Jersey, and 1,460 were from Southern Jersey. The Transportation for the 21st Century study relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of all travel for a 24-hour period. It was based on telephone interviews of randomly selected households from the 14-county study area. Participating households were assigned a specific "travel day" or 24-hour period on which to record their travel and activities. Demographic variables include the number of vehicles in the household, household income, age, gender, whether respondents held a valid driver's license, whether respondents had a disability, and employment status.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

San Diego Region Travel Behavior Survey (1995) (ICPSR 34791)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-13
Geographic coverage: San Diego, United States, California
Time period: 1995-01-01--1995-06-30
The 1995 San Diego Travel Behavior Study was designed to examine the relationship between characteristics of households and travel behavior. This travel survey relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel. Recruitment of households was conducted through a "recruitment interview" in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose and the respondent's obligation to complete diaries. Data on households and household members were also collected during the recruitment interview, including whether the respondent was a homemaker, how often the respondent worked from home, and the number of vehicles in the household. Participating households were assigned a "travel day" during which household members were asked to record travel information in their diaries for a specified 24 hour period. Respondents were asked to document detailed information regarding their trips including number of trips and information about parking. Demographic variables include gender, age, race, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, employment status, whether the respondent had a disability, occupation, and whether the respondent was a student.
Curated
Simple Crosstabs

Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 1982 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey) (ICPSR 34738)

Released/updated on: 2013-08-07
Geographic coverage: Minneapolis, United States, St. Paul, Minnesota
Time period: 1982-09-01--1983-02-27
The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 1982 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey) was intended to document how Twin Cities residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the region. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children under five years old in the household, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, and whether respondents had a valid drivers license at the time of the survey.
Back to top