Channels of Interstate Risk Sharing, United States, 1963-2000 (ICPSR 25541)
This study developed a framework for quantifying the amount of risk sharing among states in the United States, and constructed data that allowed researchers to decompose the cross-sectional variance in gross state product into levels of smoothing capital markets, federal government, and credit market smoothing.
The collection contains 67 Excel data files, that were grouped into 17 datasets based on the organizational ordering schematic provided by the principal investigator, including:
- Dataset 1 - State Personal Income: n=1,938, 51 variables
- Dataset 2 - Federal Taxes and Contributions: n=17,948, 424 variables
- Dataset 3 - State Population: n=1,887, 51 variables
- Dataset 4 - State and Local Personal Taxes: n=11,526, 306 variables
- Dataset 5 - Interests on State and Local Funds: n=7,609, 205 variables
- Dataset 6 - Transfers: n=5,814, 153 variables
- Dataset 7 - Non Federal State Income: n=1,887, 51 variables
- Dataset 8 - Federal Grants: n=1,938, 51 variables
- Dataset 9 - Federal Transfers to Individuals: n=27,415, 766 variables
- Dataset 10 - Federal Personal Taxes: n=1,938, 51 variables
- Dataset 11 - State Government Expenditure: n=1,887, 51 variables
- Dataset 12 - Disposable State Income: n=1,836, 51 variables
- Dataset 13 - State Consumption: n=5,508, 153 variables
- Dataset 14 - State and Local Transfers: n=1,836, 51 variables
- Dataset 15 - Gross State Product: n=1,910, 52 variables
- Dataset 16 - Retail Sales: n=3,774, 102 variables
- Dataset 17 - Personal Consumption Expenditures: n=38, 2 variables
General Social Survey, 1972-2014 [Cumulative File] (ICPSR 36319)
General Social Survey, 1972-2016 [Cumulative File] (ICPSR 36797)
Identity Formation and Social Problems in Estonia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan: Focus Group and Oral History Transcripts, 1996-1998 (ICPSR 36802)
This study sought to understand how various forms of social identity structured the articulation of social problems that accompanied the post-Soviet transition, and how the articulation of these social issues related to the formation of identities in post-Soviet society. These questions underlie the structure of the interviews conducted in Estonia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan between 1996 and 1998.
Interviews were conducted in two formats: either a focus group consisting of 6-8 individuals or an individual oral history interview. Thirty-six focus groups, evenly divided between the three countries, were conducted in 14 locations across the three countries. Groups were divided by gender and ethnicity/nationality. During the focus groups, participants were asked to describe positive and negative events of the previous 10 years and whether these changes specific groups of people more than others. Depending on the site, focus groups were sometimes asked to comment on specific issues. For example, the three locations chosen for their proximity to ecological crises (Sillamäe, Ivankiv, and Moynak) were asked about environmental problems. Focus group participants were asked to provide the names of prominent local people who could comment on the social issues discussed during the session.
A total of 35 oral history interviews were conducted with prominent citizens in each location: 10 each in Estonia and Uzbekistan and 15 in Ukraine. The 2-hour interviews were designed to record information about the interviewee's personal background as well as their involvement in the changes occurring in the past 10 years, assessment of the current situation, and thoughts on the future directions of their countries.