Search results

Showing 1 – 4 of 4 results.
Curated
Partially restricted
Simple Crosstabs

American Health Values Survey (AHVS): Sentinel Communities Segmentation, 5 American communities, 2016-2017 (ICPSR 37910)

Released/updated on: 2021-11-22
Geographic coverage: Baltimore, United States, Phoenix, California, Alabama, Maryland, Mobile, Arizona, Stockton, Nebraska
Time period: 2016-01-01--2017-01-01

The American Health Values Survey (AHVS) was conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago in order to develop a typology of Americans based on their health values and beliefs. The survey, of more than 10,000 adults from five individual communities, examined values and beliefs related to health at both the individual as well as societal levels. The community surveys sought to compare differences between the local typologies, but also to investigate any similarities with national typology groups. The survey assessed the importance of health in:

  • day-to-day personal life (i.e. the amount of effort spent on disease prevention as well as appropriate seeking of medical care);
  • equity, the value placed on the opportunity to succeed generally in life as well as on health equity;
  • social solidarity, the importance of taking into account the needs of others as well as personal needs;
  • health care disparities, views about how easy/hard it is for African Americans, Latinos and low-income Americans to get quality health care;
  • and, the importance of the social determinants of health.

In addition, the survey also explored views about how active government should be in health; collective efficacy, the ease of affecting positive community change by working with others; and health-related civic engagement e.g. the support of health charities and organizations working on health issues.

There are public-use and restricted-use versions of the data provided for each of the five sentinel communities participating in this study. Although each site differs on the number of respondents as listed below, each data file contains the same 143 variables for each site and version of the data. The only difference between the public-use versus restricted-use versions of the data is the variable ZIP, which was MASKED in the public-use version.

  • DS1 and DS2 - Baltimore, Maryland: 2,139
  • DS3 and DS4 - Maricopa County, Arizona: 2,247
  • DS5 and DS6 - Stockton, California: 2,127
  • DS7 and DS8 - Mobile, Alabama: 1,821
  • DS9 and DS10 - North Central counties in Nebraska: 2,846
Curated
Restricted

Annotated Clinical MRIs and Linked Metadata of Patients with Acute Stroke, Baltimore, Maryland, 2009-2019 (ICPSR 38464)

Released/updated on: 2025-10-08
Geographic coverage: Baltimore, United States, Maryland
Time period: 2009-01-01--2019-12-31

This is a collection of 2,888 clinical MRIs of patients admitted at a National Stroke Center, over ten years, with clinical diagnosis of acute or early subacute stroke. The collection includes diverse MRI modalities and protocols. The infarct core was manually defined in the diffusion weighted images; the images are provided in native subject space and in standard space (MNI), in Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIfTI) format. The data format and organization follows Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) guidelines. The collection includes diverse metadata, comprised of demographic information, basic clinical profile (NIH Stroke Scale/Score (NIHSS), hospitalization duration, blood pressure at admission, BMI, and associated health conditions), and expert description of the acute lesion. This resource provides high quality, large scale, human-supervised knowledge to feed artificial intelligence models and enable further development of tools to automate several tasks that currently rely on human labor, such as lesion segmentation, labeling, calculation of disease-relevant scores, and lesion-based studies relating function to frequency lesion maps.

The dataset is divided in folders with 60-70 subjects. Each folder contains the "raw data" (multimodal MRIs, in native space), "DWI-mask" (manually-defined lesion masks, brain masks, and 3D DWI, b0, and recalculated ADC), "DWI-MNI-IntensityNormalized" (DWI and lesion masks in MNI coordinates), and "phenotype" (individual ".tsv" files with metadata of each subject). The "templates" folder contains images averages and lesion frequency maps. The "documentation" contains comprehensive data documentation, the phenotypes of the whole dataset, and the data dictionary.

Curated
Simple Crosstabs

East Asian Social Survey (EASS), Cross-National Survey Data Sets: Health and Society in East Asia, 2010 (ICPSR 34608)

Released/updated on: 2022-04-25
Geographic coverage: South Korea, Asia, Japan, Taiwan, China (Peoples Republic)
Time period: 2010-02-01--2010-12-01
The East Asian Social Survey (EASS) is a biennial social survey project that serves as a cross-national network of the following four General Social Survey type surveys in East Asia: Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS), and comparatively examines diverse aspects of social life in these regions. Survey information in this module focused on issues that affected overall health, such as specific conditions, physical functioning, aid received from family members or friends when needed, and lifestyle choices. Topics included activities respondents were able to perform and how they were affected socially in light of specific physical and mental health conditions. Respondents were asked to provide health conditions they were suffering from, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and how these conditions were limiting with respect to general health, physical functioning, emotional and mental health, as well as social functioning. Other topics included participation and frequency of lifestyle habits that affected overall health, as well as how often respondents visited the doctor. Respondents were also queried on whether they sought out alternative, non-traditional homeopathic care and whether family, friends, or co-workers listened to their personal problems and provided support financially. Additional topics include the environment and pollution, neighborhood amenities, fear of aging, addiction, and body image. Demographic information specific to the respondent and their spouse includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status and hours worked, occupation, earnings and income, religion, class, size of community, and region.
Curated
Restricted

Expansion Research Capability to Study Comparative Effectiveness in Complex Patients, 2007-2010 [Tampa, St. Petersburg, and Clearwater, Florida] (ICPSR 34544)

Released/updated on: 2013-03-05
Geographic coverage: United States, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Florida, Tampa
Time period: 2006-01-01--2011-01-01

Overview

The Florida Department of Health and the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS) collaborated with a hospital network composed of nine clinical facilities, to capture electronic medical records (EMR) data of patients who were diagnosed with or treated for invasive breast cancer from 2007 to 2010. Certain hospital data elements were available throughout 2006. An additional year of 2011 follow-up data was also available for a subset of patients receiving medication treatment. The purpose of the data capture was to advance patient-centered outcomes research to reduce the morbidity and mortality of cancer and other comorbidities.

A breast cancer pilot study was also conducted from a subset of all transmitted EMR records, consisting of admission records with a principal and/or secondary ICD-9-CM diagnosis between 174.0 and 174.9. The subset dataset was then linked to the central cancer registry using patient social security number, first and last name, and date of birth. Using a deterministic matching algorithm a total of 11,506 unique patients were matched to a patient in the FCDS database, resulting in 12,804 primary tumors and 53,940 unique hospital admission records. While the hospital EMR defined the patient dataset, all registry records for that patient were included in the final breast cancer pilot database, regardless of the reporting hospital or the date of diagnosis. This was to ensure capture of the entire diagnostic and treatment profile for each breast cancer patient.

Data Access

These data are not available from ICPSR. The data contain confidential information that can directly identify a patient. There are also reporting facility data. Therefore, to obtain these data, researchers will need to follow the Florida Cancer Data System data-sharing agreement process, as outlined on the FCDS data sharing request.