COVID-19 and the Experiences of Populations at Greater Risk: Wave 4 General Population, United States, 2020-2021 (ICPSR 38737)
In the context of COVID-19, RAND and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation partnered again to build from the National Survey of Health Attitudes to implement a longitudinal survey to understand how these health views and values have been affected by the experience of the pandemic, with particular focus on populations deemed vulnerable or underserved, including people of color and those from low- to moderate-income backgrounds.
The questions in this COVID-19 survey focused specifically on experiences related to the pandemic (e.g., financial, physical, emotional), how respondents viewed the disproportionate impacts of the pandemic, whether and how respondents' views and priorities regarding health actions and investments are changing (including the roles of government and the private sector), and how general values about such issues as freedom and racism may be related to pandemic views and response expectations.
This study includes the results for Wave 4 for the general population.
Demographic information includes sex, marital status, household size, race and ethnicity, family income, employment status, age, and census region.
COVID-19 and the Experiences of Populations at Greater Risk: Wave 4, United States, 2020-2021 (ICPSR 38735)
In the context of COVID-19, RAND and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) partnered again to build from the National Survey of Health Attitudes to implement a longitudinal survey to understand how health views and values have been affected by the experience of the pandemic, with particular focus on populations deemed vulnerable or underserved, including people of color and those from low to moderate-income backgrounds.
The questions in this COVID-19 survey focused specifically on experiences related to the pandemic (e.g., financial, physical, emotional), how respondents viewed the disproportionate impacts of the pandemic, whether and how respondents' views and priorities regarding health actions and investments are changing (including the roles of government and the private sector), and how general values about such issues as freedom and racism may be related to pandemic views and response expectations. Some questions used in the NSHA are fielded in this COVID-19 survey while others are newly used from other COVID-19 surveys or newly developed for this effort. The study is a longitudinal study, collecting data in four waves. The study also included 2 populations: A sample of populations at greater risk, and a general population sample. This study includes the results for Wave 4 for populations at greater risk. The questions in the surveys were largely similar across all four waves.
Demographic info includes sex, marital status, household size, race and ethnicity, family income, employment status, age, and census region.
Forces of Change Survey, United States, 2020 (ICPSR 39356)
The National Association of County and City Health Officials' (NACCHO) Forces of Change Survey was developed as an evolution to NACCHO's Job Losses and Program Cuts Surveys (also known as the Economic Surveillance Surveys), which measured the impact of the economic recession on local health departments' (LHDs) budgets, staff, and programs.
The Forces of Change Survey continues to measure changes in LHD budgets, staff, and programs and assess more broadly the impact of forces affecting change in LHDs. For the 2020 Forces of Change survey, the core set of questions were distributed to a total of 2392 LHDs in the United States, with a stratified random sample of 905 LHDs receiving the module questionnaire.
More specifically, the survey collected information about LHD staffing levels, workforce reductions, and changes in budget sizes; provided services or functions; changes in the level of service delivery; billing for clinical services; efforts to help people enroll in health insurance from exchanges under the Affordable Care Act; awareness of and involvement in the State Innovation Models Initiative; participation in the Public Health Accreditation Board's national accreditation program for LHDs; and whether LHDs are part of a combined health and human services agency.