Search Results
Showing 1 - 16 of 16 results.
- Search terms can be anywhere in the study: title, description, variables, etc.
- Because our holdings are large, we recommend using at least two query terms:
rural economy
home ownership
higher education
- Keywords help delimit the breadth of results. Therefore, use as many as required to achieve your desired results:
elementary education federal funding
- Our search will find studies with derivative expressions of your query terms: A search for
"nation"
will find results containing "national" - Use quotes to search for an exact expression:
"social mobility"
- You can combine exact expressions with loose terms:
"united states" inmates
- Exclude results by using a MINUS sign:
elections -sweden -germany
will exclude swedish and german election studies - On the results page, you will be able to sort and filter to further refine results.
Hidden
Study Title/Investigator
Released/Updated
1.
Agricultural and Demographic Records for Rural Households in the North, 1860: [Instructional Materials] (ICPSR 3463)
Oberly, James W.
Oberly, James W.
These instructional materials were prepared for use with
AGRICULTURAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC RECORDS FOR HOUSEHOLDS IN THE NORTH, 1860
(ICPSR 7420), compiled by Fred Bateman and James D. Foust. The data
file and accompanying documentation are provided to assist educators
in (an SPSS portable file) instructing students about the history of
agriculture and rural life in the North, just prior to the Civil
War. An instructor's handout has also been included. This handout
contains the following sections, among others: (1) General goals for
student analysis of quantitative datasets, (2) Specific goals in
studying this dataset, (3) Suggested appropriate courses for use of
the dataset, (4) Tips for using the dataset, and (5) Related secondary
source readings. Demographic, occupational, and economic information
for over 21,000 rural households in the northern United States in 1860
are presented in the dataset. The data were obtained from the
manuscript agricultural and population schedules of the 1860 United
States Census and are provided for all households in a single township
from each of the 102 randomly-selected counties in 16 northern states.
Variables in the dataset include farm values, livestock, and crop
production figures for the households that owned or operated farms
(over half the households sampled), as well as value of real and
personal estate, color, sex, age, literacy, school attendance,
occupation, place of birth, and parents' nationality of all
individuals residing in the sampled townships.
2002-10-17
2.
American Community Survey (ACS): Three-Year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2005-2007 (ICPSR 25042)
United States. Bureau of the Census
United States. Bureau of the Census
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
2010-02-04
3.
The metropolitan survey is conducted in even-numbered years, cycling through a set of 41 metropolitan areas, surveying each one about once every 6 years. This data collection provides information on the characteristics of a metropolitan sample of housing units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units. The data are presented in seven separate parts: Part 1, Work Done Record (Replacement or Addition to the House), Part 2, Journey to Work Record, Part 3, Mortgages (Owners Only), Part 4, Housing Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner Record (Renters Only), Part 6, Person Record, and Part 7, Mover Group Record. Data include year the structure was built, type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, access, number of rooms, presence of commercial establishments on the property, and property value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing facilities, types of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage disposal, heating and air-conditioning equipment, and major additions, alterations, or repairs to the property. Information provided on housing expenses includes monthly mortgage or rent payments, cost of services such as utilities, garbage collection, and property insurance, and amount of real estate taxes paid in the previous year. Also included is information on whether the household received government assistance to help pay heating or cooling costs or for other energy-related services. Similar data are provided for housing units previously occupied by respondents who had recently moved. Additionally, indicators of housing and neighborhood quality are supplied. Housing quality variables include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen facilities, basement or roof leakage, breakdowns of plumbing facilities and equipment, and overall opinion of the structure. For quality of neighborhood, variables include use of exterminator services, existence of boarded-up buildings, and overall quality of the neighborhood. In addition to housing characteristics, some demographic data are provided on household members, such as age, sex, race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder. Additional data provided on the householder include years of school completed, Spanish origin, length of residence, and length of occupancy.
2009-10-13
4.
Baby's First Years (BFY), New York City, New Orleans, Omaha, and Twin Cities, 2018-2023 (ICPSR 37871)
Magnuson, Katherine A.; Noble, Kimberly; Duncan, Greg J.; Fox, Nathan A.; Gennetian, Lisa A.; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu; Halpern-Meekin, Sarah
Magnuson, Katherine A.; Noble, Kimberly; Duncan, Greg J.; Fox, Nathan A.; Gennetian, Lisa A.; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu; Halpern-Meekin, Sarah
The overall goal of the Baby's First Years study is to assess the causal role played by household income in affecting children's early cognitive, socio-emotional, and brain development. Recent advances in developmental neuroscience suggest that experiences early in life have profound and enduring impacts on the developing brain. Family economic resources shape the nature of many of these experiences, yet the extent to which they affect children's development is unknown. The Baby's First Years project is the first randomized controlled trial to provide estimates of the causal impacts of unconditional cash gifts on the cognitive, socio-emotional, and brain development of infants and young children in low-income U.S. families.
Specifically, 1,000 recruited mothers of infants with incomes below the federal poverty line from four diverse U.S. communities are receiving monthly cash gift payments by debit card. Mothers were initially told the gifts would last for the first 40 months of their child's life, but we have secured funding to continue the payments for three additional years (i.e., for a total of 76 months). Parents in the high cash gift group (n=400 in the study sample) are receiving a cash gift of $333 per month ($4,000 per year), while parents in the low cash gift group (n=600) are receiving a nominal monthly gift payment of $20 ($240 per year), also for 76 months.
In order to measure the impacts of the unconditional cash gift income on children's cognitive and behavioral development, we are assessing high and low cash gift group differences at ages 4, 6, and 8 (and, for a subset of measures, we capture interim development at ages 1, 2, and 3) in measures of cognitive, language, memory, self-regulation, and socio-emotional development. In order to understand the processes by which child impacts emerge, we are measuring a host of family process measures summarized in our pre-registration chart. Our data collection points are referred to as: "baseline", "age 1", "age 2," "age 3", "age 4", "age 6", and "age 8".
Additional information on the project, survey design, sample, variables, and COVID-19 pandemic adjustments are available from:
The User Guides for Baseline, Age 1, Age 2, Age 3, and Age 4, which are included under the "Data and Documentation" tab
The project's website: babysfirstyears.com
The researchers request that all peer-reviewed papers using BFY Data:
be submitted to PubMed https://publicaccess.nih.gov immediately upon acceptance for publication
include the following citation to the data in their bibliography:
Citation
Magnuson, Katherine A., Kimberly Noble, Greg J. Duncan, Nathan A. Fox, Lisa A. Gennetian, Hirokazu Yoshikawa, and Sarah Halpern-Meekin. Baby's First Years (BFY), New York City, New Orleans, Omaha, and Twin Cities, 2018-2023. ICPSR37871-v8. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], YYYY-MM-DD. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37871.v8
and include the following in their acknowledgements:
Acknowledgement
This research uses data from the Baby's First Years study. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver Nati,onal Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD087384 and 2R01HD087384. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This research was additionally supported by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research-Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Andrew and Julie Klingenstein Family Fund; Annie E. Casey Foundation; Arnold Ventures; Arrow Impact; BCBS of Louisiana Foundation; Bezos Family Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Bill Hammack and Janice Parmelee, Brady Education Fund; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (Silicon Valley Community Foundation); Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Philanthropies; Child Welfare Fund; Esther A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund; Ford Foundation; Greater New Orleans Foundation; Heising-Simons Foundation; Holland Foundation; Jacobs Foundation; JPB Foundation; J-PAL North America; Lozier Foundation; New York City Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity; Perigee Fund; Robin Hood Foundation; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Russell Sage Foundation; Sherwood Foundation; Valhalla Foundation; Weitz Family Foundation; W.K. Kellogg Foundation; and three anonymous donors.
Principal Investigators
Katherine Magnuson, PhD; University of Wisconsin-Madison, lead PI social and behavioral science
Kimberly Noble, MD, PhD; Teachers College, Columbia University, lead PI neuroscience
In alphabetical order:
Greg Duncan, PhD; University of California, Irvine
Nathan A. Fox, PhD; University of Maryland
Lisa A. Gennetian, PhD; Duke University Sanford School of Public Policy
Hirokazu Yoshikawa, PhD; New York University
Principal Investigators of Qualitative Substudy
Sarah Halpern-Meekin, PhD; University of Wisconsin-Madison
Katherine Magnuson, PhD; University of Wisconsin-Madison
Study Management
Lauren Meyer, Teachers College, Columbia University; National Project Director
Andrea Karsh, University of California, Irvine; Administrative Director
Matthew Maury, Duke University, Production and Retention Management
Study Co-Investigators
Sarah Black, PhD; University of New Orleans
William Fifer, PhD; Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Columbia University Medical Center
Michael Georgieff, MD; University of Minnesota
Joseph Isler, PhD; Columbia University Medical Center
Debra Karhson, PhD; University of New Orleans
Alicia Kunin-Batson, PhD, University of Minnesota
Connie Lamm, PhD; University of Arkansas
Dennis Molfese, PhD; University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Victoria Molfese, PhD; University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Jennifer Mize Nelson, PhD; University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Timothy Nelson, PhD; University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Sonya Troller-Renfree, PhD; Teachers College, Columbia University
Study Data Collectors
The Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, is responsible for recruitment and baseline, age-1, age-2, and age-3 data collection waves. Starting at age-4 through age-8, SRC is r,esponsible for tracking families and assisting site-based staff in locating families. SRC data collection operations are overseen by: Stephanie Chardoul, Director of Survey Research Operations and Piotr Dworak, Senior Survey Specialist, Survey Research Operations.
Contact
To contact the study investigators, email them at info@babysfirstyears.com
Website: babysfirstyears.com
2025-01-30
5.
The 1940 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block length records to ASCII format.
2006-01-12
6.
The 1950 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
2006-01-12
7.
The 1960 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
2006-01-12
8.
The 1970 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
2006-01-12
9.
Great Plains Population and Environment Data: Agricultural Data, 1870-1997 [United States] (ICPSR 4254)
Gutmann, Myron P.
Gutmann, Myron P.
The data in this series of studies were assembled by an
interdisciplinary research team led by Myron Gutmann of the University
of Michigan between 1995 and 2004, as part of a research project
funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
(Grant Number R01HD033554 to the University of Michigan). The goal of
the project was to amass information about approximately 500 counties
in 12 states of the Great Plains of the United States, and then to
analyze those data in order to understand the relationships between
population and environment that existed between the years of about
1870 and 2000. The data distributed here are all data about
counties. They fall into four broad categories: about the counties,
about agriculture, about demographic and social conditions, and about
the environment. The information about counties (name, area,
identification code, and whether the project classified the county as
part of the Great Plains in a given year) is embedded in each of the
other data files, so that there will be three series of data
(agriculture, demographic and social conditions, and environment),
containing individual data files for each year for which data are
available. The United States Census of Agriculture has been conducted
since 1850 on a regular schedule that was decennial until 1920, and
more frequently thereafter (every five years from 1925 to 1950, then
in 1954, 1959, 1964, 1978, and every five years since 1982). The
agricultural data included in this collection consist of a single data
file for each agricultural census year between 1870 and 1997 that
includes selected material compiled as part of the United States
Agricultural Census. The county-level agricultural data produced by
the United States government as part of the census constitute a
consistent series of measures of changing agriculture and land use.
2005-06-22
10.
Great Plains Population and Environment Data: Biogeochemical Modeling Data, 1860-2003 [United States] (ICPSR 31681)
Parton, William J.; Gutmann, Myron P.; Hartman, Melannie D.; Merchant, Emily R.; Lutz, Susan M.
Parton, William J.; Gutmann, Myron P.; Hartman, Melannie D.; Merchant, Emily R.; Lutz, Susan M.
This study is part of a series of studies assembled by an interdisciplinary research team led by Myron Gutmann of the University of Michigan between 1995 and 2004, as part of a research project funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant Number R01HD033554 to the University of Michigan). The goal of the project was to amass information about approximately 500 counties in 12 states of the Great Plains of the United States, and then to analyze those data in order to understand the relationships between population and environment that existed between the years of 1860 and 2003. The data distributed as part of this series are all data about counties. They fall into four broad categories: information about the counties, about agriculture, about demographic and social conditions, and about the environment. The information about counties (name, area, identification code, and whether the project classified the county as part of the Great Plains in a given year) is embedded in each of the other data files, so that there will be three series of data (agriculture, demographic and social conditions, and environment), containing individual data files for each year for which data are available.
Specifically, this study contains environmental data and is meant to aid the modeling of the biogeochemical effects of cropping in the Great Plains region. These data were generated by the Daycent ecosystem model, which has been used extensively to simulate soil biogeochemical dynamics from agricultural systems throughout the United States. Variables include information on above-ground production, soil and system carbon, evaporation and transpiration data, soil temperature, nitrogen mineralization, and fluxes of various chemical compounds.
2012-10-04
11.
Helping Young Smokers Quit: Identifying Best Practices for Tobacco Cessation, Phase II National Program Evaluation, 2003-2006 (ICPSR 33161)
Mermelstein, Robin J.; Curry, Susan J.
Mermelstein, Robin J.; Curry, Susan J.
The Helping Young Smokers Quit (HYSQ) initiative was a multi-phase project that addressed the critical need to disseminate effective, developmentally appropriate cessation programs for young smokers. Phase I identified and described tobacco treatment programs available for youth in the United States, Phase II evaluated smoking secession programs tailored for youth to help understand what works, and Phase III identified factors associated with program sustainability. Phase II collected data from five sources: (1) program participants, (2) program providers, (3) program curricula, (4) organizational leaders, and (5) community leaders and community ordinances.
Program participants were interviewed at baseline, end-of program, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Topics covered by the interviews include age, gender, race, Hispanic origin, language spoken at home, employment, income, religiosity, school enrollment, education level, school grades, height, weight, extracurricular activities, recreation, sports, exercise, aspirations after high school, psychological well-being, alcohol consumption, cigarette use and use of other tobacco products, attitudes about smoking, plans to stop/continue smoking, attempts to quit smoking, reasons for participating in the program, topics/issues covered by the program, opinions about the program, and smoking experience since the beginning of the program. In addition, for each follow-up survey, the participants provided a breath sample for carbon monoxide analysis to validate self-reported quit status.
After the last session of each program delivery, the program providers, such as program leaders and cessation counselors, were interviewed about the content and delivery of the program and the reactions of the participants and themselves to the program as delivered. The program providers also kept attendance records.
Curriculum content was abstracted from program manuals and other materials used in each program.
Organizational leaders of the organizations that offered the programs were surveyed about various aspects of each organization, including the organization's smoking cessation program and the organization's mission, general operations, and smoking-related policies and practices.
Community-level information was collected in two ways: (1) interviews of community leaders representing local health departments, school boards, and juvenile justice offices, and (2) archival research of public ordinances relevant to tobacco and control policies.
Nine data files/datasets constitute the data. Datasets 1-4 contain the participant questionnaire data, carbon monoxide measurement data, and program attendance data. Dataset 5 comprises information about each program and its curriculum, some information about the community in which the program was located, and summary data about enforcement of tobacco-related ordinances. Dataset 6 contains information about about the program providers and each program delivery, including recruitment, logistics, content, and the reactions of providers and participants. Dataset 7 covers administrative aspects of the smoking cessation programs and each offering organization's mission, general operations, and smoking-related policies and norms. Dataset 8 contains information about local and state-level tobacco-related ordinances for every state and local jurisdiction where each program was located, and Dataset 9 condenses the ,information in Dataset 8 into one summary record for each community. The unit of observation for Datasets 1-4 is the participant, for Datasets 5 and 7 the smoking cessation program/offering organization, for Dataset 6 the program delivery/program cohort, for Dataset 8 the ordinance, and for Dataset 9 the community.
2024-02-14
12.
Mortality Detail and Multiple Cause of Death, 1981 (ICPSR 3874)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
This data collection presents information about the causes
of deaths occurring during 1981. Part 1, the Mortality Detail file,
describes every death or fetal death registered in the United States
for 1981. Part 2, Multiple Cause of Death, provides information about
the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States,
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during
1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death,
multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence
of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an
autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition,
data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education,
usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple
cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL
STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH,
NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2.
2007-07-12
13.
Natality Detail File, 2006 [United States] (ICPSR 24941)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics
This collection provides information on live births in the United States during calendar year 2006. The natality data in these files are a component of the vital statistics collection effort maintained by the federal government. Birth data is limited to births occurring in the United States to United States residents and nonresidents. Births occurring to United States citizens outside of the United States are not included in this data collection. Part 1 contains data on births occurring within the United States, while Part 2 contains data on births occurring in the United States territories of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Beginning in 2005, the United States file no longer includes geographic detail (e.g., mother's state of residence). Geographic variables for the United States Territories file include the territory and county in which the birth occurred and in which the mother resided. Other variables describe the place of delivery, who was in attendance, and medical and health data such as the method of delivery, prenatal care, tobacco and alcohol use during pregnancy, pregnancy history, medical risk factors, and infant health characteristics. Birth and fertility rates and other statistics related to this study can be found in the National Vital Statistics Report in the codebook documentation. Demographic variables include the child's sex and month and year of birth, the parent's age, race, and ethnicity, as well as the mother's marital status, education level, and residency status.
2009-08-19
14.
Population Redistribution and Economic Growth in the United States: Population Data, 1870-1960 (ICPSR 7753)
Kuznets, Simon; Thomas, Dorothy Swaine
Kuznets, Simon; Thomas, Dorothy Swaine
Detailed demographic characteristics of the population of
the United States from 1870 to 1960 are contained in this data
collection. Included are state-level estimates of the nation's
inhabitants by sex, race, nativity and age, as well as intercensal
migration calculated by age, race, and sex. The basic information
recorded in this collection was obtained from the decennial censuses of
the United States or estimated by the principal investigators from
material collected by the decennial censuses. The collection is
comprised of thirteen separate data files. Each contains information
for every state in the nation. All parts have a rectangular file
structure with one record per case, with the number of cases ranging
from 50 to 2,891, and the record length from 203 to 2,930 per part.
Standard geographic identifying codes used in all of the files permit
the combination of two or more of the files as research interests
dictate.
2011-08-31
15.
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 1982 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey) (ICPSR 34738)
Twin Cities Metropolitan Council
Twin Cities Metropolitan Council
The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 1982 Travel Behavior Inventory (Home Interview Survey) was intended to document how Twin Cities residents use the streets, highways, and transit services in the region. Respondents were asked to record their travel and activities for a 24-hour period. They were also asked for detailed information regarding their trips, including mode of transportation, trip purpose, departure and arrival times, and number of passengers. Demographic variables include gender, age, employment status, household size, number of children under five years old in the household, whether household members were students on their given travel day, household income, and whether respondents had a valid drivers license at the time of the survey.
2013-08-07
16.
The Youth Development Study (YDS) was initiated as a school-based study of adolescent children and their parents to examine the consequences of formative experiences in adolescence for mental health, value formation, educational achievement, and multiple facets of behavioral adjustment. Particular attention was directed to the impacts of early work experience. Data were also obtained about parent-child and peer relationships and experiences in school. As the study continued, the focus shifted to adult development and attainment and, most recently, mid-life adjustment and health. This comprehensive longitudinal study now encompasses three generations: the initial cohort studied from adolescence to mid-life (G2), their parents (G1), and their adolescent children (G3). Data from three generations in the same families enable study of intergenerational relationships and differences in the experience of adolescence and transition to adulthood across parent and child cohorts. The YDS covers a wide range of topics of interest to sociologists, social psychologists, developmental psychologists, and life course scholars, including the development and impacts of agentic resources, socioeconomic attainment, processes of inter- and intra-generational mobility, objective and subjective work conditions, family relationships, intergenerational relationships, mental and physical health, and well-being.
In-school administration of paper surveys during the first four years of the study was supplemented by mailed surveys. Subsequent data collection took place entirely by mail, with 19 surveys conducted between 1988 and 2011. A final survey was conducted on-line in 2019. Survey data was obtained from the parents (G1) of this cohort during the first and fourth waves of the study (1988 and 1991). Surveys of the children (G3) began in 2009, continued in 2010 and 2011 (by mail) and in 2019-2020 (online).
The Youth Development Study measures a wide range of formative experiences and both psychological and behavioral variables, using survey methodology.
The G1 surveys obtained information about socioeconomic background as well as attitudes toward teenage employment, the parents' own employment as teenagers, their current work experiences, and educational expectations for their children.
The G2 surveys during the high school years included detailed questions about students' work and volunteer experiences, as well as experiences in their family, school, and peer groups, with an emphasis on the ways that working affected other life domains, mental health, and well-being. Shorter surveys containing many of the same topics were administered to students in 1992, 1993, and 1994, and included questions about current family and living arrangements. In 1995, a full survey was administered covering the wide range of topics included in previous surveys as well as information about career plans and life events that had occurred in the past five years. G2 Waves 9 through 19 (1997-2011) included many of the same questions contained in earlier surveys and additional sections that focused on the respondents' educational experiences, family relationships, sources of living expenses, and health and well-being. The most recent G2 survey (2019), administered on-line, included questions about support of aging parents. The YDS is unique in its coverage of both objective and subjective work experiences from adolescence to mid-life.
The topics cov,ered by the G3 surveys are very similar to the G2 variables described above. Variables in each G2 and G3 wave are included in cross-wave codebooks, available at the Data Archive Codebook website.
For an overview of the Youth Development Study, see Mortimer, Jeylan T. (2012) "The Evolution, Contributions, and Prospects of the Youth Development Study: An Investigation in Life Course Social Psychology." Social Psychology Quarterly 75(1, March):5-27.
2023-09-28