Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1982 (ICPSR 8121)

Published: Mar 27, 2017 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
C. van der Eijk, University of Amsterdam. Department of Political Science; B. Niemoeller, University of Amsterdam. Department of Political Science; M.J. Koopman, University of Amsterdam. Department of Political Science; S.M.J. Koopman, University of Amsterdam. Department of Political Science

Series:

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08121.v2

Version V2

Sixth in a series of election studies in the Netherlands, this survey was conducted after the parliamentary elections of September 1982. Like its predecessors, it also focuses upon the partisan orientations and political attitudes of the Dutch electorate. Most of the questions are identical to those used in the 1981 survey. The survey was administered to two separate samples: individuals previously interviewed in the three waves of the 1981 election study (Wave 4), and a fresh sample of individuals not previously interviewed. Of the 2,305 respondents in the original 1981 sample, 1,206 were successfully interviewed in all four waves. The fresh sample includes 1,541 respondents. Of the four data files produced by the 1982 election study, two are available from ICPSR and the other two are held by the Steinmetz Archive in Amsterdam. The Combination File (Part 1) includes data for all of the respondents interviewed in 1982 (1,541 from the fresh sample and 1,206 from Wave 4, for a total of 2,747). Included in this file is a filter variable by which the user can separate the fresh sample respondents from Wave 4 respondents. The Overall File (Part 2) adds to the Combination File the 1,099 attrition cases from the original 1981 sample of 2,305, for a total of 3,846. The codebook also provides frequencies for the two files held by the Steinmetz Archive.

van der Eijk, C., Niemoeller, B., Koopman, M.J., and Koopman, S.M.J. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1982. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-03-27. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08121.v2

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Netherlands), Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (Netherlands), Social and Cultural Planning Office (Netherlands), Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research, University of Amsterdam. Department of Political Science, Leiden University (Netherlands), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Tilburg University (Netherlands)

province

Steinmetz Archive, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
1982
1982

Conducted by Dutch Inter-university Election Study Workgroup (NKO), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

A sample of 2,646 households was drawn from the mail-delivery register. One elector per household was selected for interviewing.

Cross-sectional

Households listed in the mail-delivery register in the Netherlands.

individual
survey data

1985-10-09

2017-03-27

2018-02-15 The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. The previous citation was:
  • van der Eijk, C., B. Niemoeller, M.J. Koopman, and S.M.J. Koopman. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1982. ICPSR08121-v2. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Steinmetz Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 2017-03-27. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08121.v2

2017-03-27 The SPSS setup files were updated to conform to current standards. SAS and Stata setup files, as well as SPSS and Stata system files, a SAS transport (CPORT) file, a R data file, a tab-delimited data file, and a PDF codebook have been added to the collection.

1985-10-09 ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:

  • Standardized missing values.
  • Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.

The data are not weighted and there are no weight variables in the data.

Notes

  • Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions.

  • The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. Please see version history for more details.
ICPSR logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.