Comparative Foreign Policy Learning Package (ICPSR 5703)

Version Date: Feb 16, 1992 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Patrick McGowan, Unknown; Michael O'Leary, Unknown

Version V1

This study contains data on national attributes and international interactions for 114 nations in the 1960s. Containing data originally collected by the International Relations Program at Syracuse University, this learning package was developed to provide an introduction to comparative foreign policy analyses and a discussion of how to employ rigorous techniques to develop ideas about the causes and consequences of foreign policy. Data are provided for economic, political, domestic, and international interaction indicators. Included for each nation is information on the gross national product (GNP), level of trade, military expenditures, type of political system, character of political regime, size of diplomatic missions, population size, sociocultural classifications, alliance bloc memberships, number of contiguous countries, voting agreements with the United States, the Soviet Union, and India, the degree of support for the United Nations, and the number of cooperative or conflictual acts sent to and received from the United States, the Soviet Union, the region, and outside the region.

McGowan, Patrick, and O’Leary, Michael. Comparative Foreign Policy Learning Package. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992-02-16.

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
Benin   Cambodia   Sudan   Paraguay   Portugal   Syria   Greece   Morocco   Iran   Mali   Panama   Guatemala   Iraq   Chile   Laos   Nepal   Argentina   Tanzania   Ghana   India   Canada   Belgium   Taiwan   Finland   South Africa   Trinidad and Tobago   Central African Republic   Jamaica   Peru   Germany   Yemen   Vietnam (Socialist Republic)   United States   Guinea   China (Peoples Republic)   Somalia   Chad   Madagascar   Ivory Coast   Thailand   Libya   Costa Rica   Sweden   Poland   Jordan   Nigeria   Bulgaria   Tunisia   Sri Lanka   Uruguay   United Kingdom   United Arab Emirates   Kenya   Switzerland   Spain   Lebanon   Cuba   Liberia   Venezuela   Czech Republic   Burkina Faso   Israel   Australia   Soviet Union   Myanmar   Cameroon   Cyprus   Malaysia   Iceland   Global   Niue   Gabon   South Korea   Austria   Yugoslavia   El Salvador   Luxembourg   Brazil   Algeria   Colombia   Ecuador   Hungary   Japan   Mauritius   Albania   New Zealand   Senegal   Italy   Honduras   Ethiopia   Haiti   Afghanistan   Burundi   Sierra Leone   Bolivia   Saudi Arabia   Netherlands   Pakistan   Ireland   Slovakia   France   Romania   Togo   Niger   Philippines   Rwanda   Nicaragua   Norway   Democratic Republic of Congo   Dominican Republic   Denmark   Mexico   Uganda   Indonesia
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

A total of 114 nations in the 1960s.

(1) Singer, David J., and Melvin Small. "National Political Units in the Twentieth Century: A Standardized List." AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW 62,3 (1968), 932-951, (2) Council of Foreign Relations. POLITICAL HANDBOOK AND ATLAS OF THE WORLD: PARLIAMENTS, PARTIES AND PRESS. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1968, (3) Putnam, Robert. "Towards Explaining Military Interventions in Latin American Politics." WORLD POLITICS 20,1 (1967), 83-110, (4) Hoggard, Gary D., and James N. Rosenau. "Foreign Policy Behavior in Dyadic Relationships: Testing a Pre-Theoretical Extension." Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, 1971, (5) United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. WORLD MILITARY EXPENDITURES, 1970. WASHINGTON, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1971, (6) Alter, Chadwick F., and Steven J. Brams. "Patterns of Representation in National Capitals and Intergovernmental Organizations." WORLD POLITICS 19,10 (1967), 647-663, (7) United Nations. Statistical Office. STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 1967. New York, NY: United Nations, 1968, (8) Gurr, Ted Robert. "A Comparative Study of Civil Strife." In Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr (eds.), THE HISTORY OF VIOLENCE IN AMERICA: HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1969, pp. 628-630, (9) Bruce, Russett M. INTERNATIONAL REGIONS AND THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM: A STUDY IN POLITICAL ECOLOGY. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1967, (10) Burton, John W. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: A GENERAL THEORY. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1967, (11) Brams, Steven J., and Michael K. O'Leary. "An Axiomatic Model of Voting Bodies." AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW 64 (1970), 449-470, (12) Brams, Steven J., and Michael K. O'Leary. "PROVOTE: A Computer Program for the Probabilistic Analysis of Voting Bodies." BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 16 (1971), 261-263, (13) Clark, John F., Michael K. O'Leary, and Eugene Wittkopf. "National Attributes Associated With Dimensions of Support for the United Nations." INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 25,1 (1971), 1-25, and (14) Rochester, Martin J. LEARNING PACKAGE 3: DYADIC DISPUTES BEFORE THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE, THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS, AND THE UNITED NATIONS: ANALYTICAL AND EMPIRICAL MATERIALS. Chicago, IL: Markham, 1971.

aggregate data


2018-02-15 The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. The previous citation was:
  • McGowan, Patrick, and Michael O'Leary. Comparative Foreign Policy Learning Package. ICPSR05703-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1999.


  • This study is intended for instructional use, and may be subsets of the original data. Variables and/or cases may have been removed to facilitate classroom use.

  • Data in this collection are available only to users at ICPSR member institutions.

  • The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented.
ICPSR logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.