Effects of ambient and haptic temperature experience on prosocial choices (US/UK 2014) (ICPSR 36761)
Version Date: Mar 22, 2017 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Dermot Lynott, Lancaster University;
Katherine Corker, Grand Valley State University;
Louise Connell, Lancaster University;
Kerry O'Brien, Monash University
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36761.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
Research in social embodied cognition has found numerous positive associations between higher temperatures and prosocial behavior, with "warmer is better" effects demonstrating greater altruism, social proximity, and affective attributions. However, recent failures to replicate experimental findings in this area have called some effects into question. By contrast, epidemiological research has frequently observed that higher ambient temperatures are correlated with increases in societal volatility and antisocial behaviors, with "warmer is worse" effects demonstrated by increases in warfare, city-center rioting, and sporting aggression. Using a sample size (N = 611) larger than many previous studies in the social priming domain, we examined whether higher ambient temperature and/or higher prop temperature (i.e., holding a hot/cold therapeutic pack) lead to more prosocial behavior. Results showed that warmer ambient temperatures were weakly associated with more prosocial than selfish choices. However, calculation of Bayes Factors suggests that the evidence is better characterized as inconclusive. As previously published analyses of the same data set used in this study show (Lynott et al., 2014), prop temperature did not lead to increased prosocial responding, which fails to support predictions from particular accounts of social embodiment. We discuss possible reasons for the inconclusive findings and for the broad range of effect sizes observed more generally in the literature.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Smallest Geographic Unit View help for Smallest Geographic Unit
City
Restrictions View help for Restrictions
This dataset is part of ICPSR's Archives of Scientific Psychology journal database. Users should contact the Editorial Office at the American Psychological Association for information on requesting data access.
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Sample View help for Sample
Convenience sampling. See Lynott, D. Corker, K. S. Connell, L. & O'Brien, K. S. (in press). The Effect of Haptic and Ambient Temperature Experience on Prosocial Behavior. Accepted for publication in Archives of Scientific Psychology.
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
100% response rate.
HideOriginal Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2017-03-22
Version History View help for Version History
- Lynott, Dermot, Katherine Corker, Louise Connell, and Kerry O'Brien. Effects of ambient and haptic temperature experience on prosocial choices (US/UK 2014). ICPSR36761-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-03-22. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36761.v1
Notes
This dataset is part of ICPSR's Archives of Scientific Psychology journal database. Users should contact the Editorial Office at the American Psychological Association for information on requesting data access.
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.
One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.
Archives of Scientific Psychology
This dataset is made available in connection to an article in Archives of Scientific Psychology, the first open-access, open-methods journal of the American Psychological Association (APA). Archiving and dissemination of this research is part of APA's commitment to collaborative data sharing.