Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) Study 2000-2013 (ICPSR 36282)

Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)

Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection

Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose

The primary aim of the MACC study was to evaluate local tobacco control programs in Minnesota, and the secondary aim was to better define the patterns of tobacco use in young adults and to evaluate the effects of tobacco control programs on these patterns.

Study Design View help for Study Design

The MACC Study employs a multilevel design, including a cohort sequential design of five ages at the individual level where individuals (adolescents) are surveyed every six months. These individuals are nested in GPUs (geo-political units) and there are longitudinal observations at the GPU level every six months as well. Finally, individuals and GPUs were randomly assigned a specific month within the six-month window for each observation; thus each month constitutes an observation in a time series design for the state of Minnesota.

Sample View help for Sample

A combination of probability and quota sampling methods (to assure equal age distribution) was used to establish the cohort. The goal was to recruit 3600 participants from Minnesota. These participants included 12 of each age from 12 to 16 years old from each of the 60 Minnesota GPUs. Recruitment was conducted by telephone by Clearwater Research, Inc., using modified random digit dial (MOD1) sampling to identify households with at least one teenager in the target age range within the target GPU. Within households, respondents were selected at random from among age quota cells that were still open for that GPU. Parent permission was obtained by telephone followed by permission from the chosen teenager before interviewing. In addition a comparison cohort (n=600) consisting of approximately 180 12-16 year olds from metropolitan Kansas City KS and MO, 240 from the rest of Kansas, 60 each from North and South Dakota and 60 from the upper peninsula of Michigan were recruited into the study. These states were chosen because as of 2000 they had devoted few resources from the Master Settlement Agreement to tobacco control and because they roughly corresponded to the demographics of Minnesota. Adolescents were interviewed by phone every six months, on the six-month anniversary of their previous interview.

Time Method View help for Time Method

Universe View help for Universe

Young adults aged 12-16 in Minnesota, Kansas, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Michigan.

Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation

Data Source View help for Data Source

Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)

Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection

Response Rates View help for Response Rates

The MACC Cumulative Response Rates by Round are as follows:

Baseline: 100%

Round 2: 96.68%

Round 3: 34.57%

Round 4: 93.53%

Round 5: 91.79%

Round 6: 89.66%

Round 8: 82.75%

Round 9: 81.99%

Round 10: 79.89%

Round 11: 80.04%

Round 12: 77.51%

Round 13: 73.07%

Round 14: 69.71%

Round 15: 60.47%

Round 17: 60.32%

Round 21: 54.35%

Round 23: 52.86%

Round 25: 50.17%

For additional information about the response rates of the MACC, please see the "Response Rates" bookmark under the Original P.I. Documentation section of the ICPSR codebook.

Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales

Common, Previously Validated Scales Present in MACC:

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) - variables Q1051-Q1055

Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependence Scale (FTND) - variables Q0161-Q0165, and Q0127)

CAGE - variables Q0483A1-Q0483A4

Susceptibility to smoking - variables Q0040, Q0140, Q0050, Q0090, Q0100, and Q0110 (learn more by reading 'An improved surveillance measure for adolescent smoking?' available on JSTOR)

Original Release Date View help for Original Release Date

2016-02-03

Version History View help for Version History

Weight View help for Weight

The data are not weighted, and no weight variables are present in the data set.