Outpatient Versus Residential Treatment Comparison for Pregnant Substance Abusers (ICPSR 34162)
Version Date: Aug 9, 2012 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Bentson H. McFarland, Oregon Health and Science University
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34162.v1
Version V1
Summary View help for Summary
Addictive disorders are chronic conditions for many women. Substance use during pregnancy is especially worrisome. Moreover, major depressive disorder often co-occurs with substance abuse among women. Therefore, pregnant women with substance abuse are complex patients. Priority populations (e.g., minority group members) are greatly over-represented among pregnant substance abusers. Treatment can be effective for female substance abusers but few (if any) data are available regarding comparative effectiveness of residential versus outpatient treatment for pregnant women with addictions. Residential treatment, by definition, provides shelter and reduces availability of substances in addition to delivering care for chemical dependency. However, residential treatment removes patients from their usual home and work environments and is more expensive than outpatient care. Although not focusing on pregnant substance abusers, studies have generally found little difference in outcomes for residential versus outpatient chemical dependency treatment. On the other hand, research has also suggested patient factors may moderate treatment impact so that sub-groups of substance abusers differentially benefit from residential (versus outpatient) care. To address these issues, this analytic epidemiologic study addresses "the benefits and harms of preventive or therapeutic interventions in 'real world' settings for patients who have multiple chronic co-morbid conditions." The chief focus is pregnant women (many of whom also have major depressive disorder) obtaining treatment for chemical dependency. The intervention is specialty sector substance abuse treatment. The "real world" settings are publicly financed substance abuse treatment programs. Among several data sets, the project employs newly available information from the nation-wide Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) discharge database. The project utilizes innovative statistical techniques (including non-linear instrumental variables approaches) to examine the comparative effectiveness of outpatient versus residential substance abuse treatment.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
-
This collection includes shapefiles and images.
-
These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigators if further information is desired.
Original Release Date View help for Original Release Date
2012-08-09
Version History View help for Version History
- McFarland, Bentson H. Outpatient Versus Residential Treatment Comparison for Pregnant Substance Abusers. ICPSR34162-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2012-08-09. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34162.v1
Notes
These data are flagged as replication datasets and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.
The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.