Seeing Through the Smoke and Mirrors: A Response to Palmer and Whitten, British Journal of Political Science, January 2003 (ICPSR 1258)

Published: Apr 25, 2003

Principal Investigator(s):
Terry J. Royed, University of Alabama; Kevin M. Leyden, West Virginia University; Stephen A. Borrelli, University of Alabama

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01258.v1

Version V1

This is a corrected version of IS CLARITY OF RESPONSIBILITY IMPORTANT FOR ECONOMIC VOTING? REVISITING POWELL AND WHITTEN'S HYPOTHESIS (ICPSR 1206), used to write two responses to criticisms made by Harvey Palmer and Guy Whitten in an exchange in the January 2003 issue of the British Journal of Political Science.

Royed, Terry J., Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen A. Seeing Through the Smoke and Mirrors:  A Response to Palmer and Whitten, British Journal of Political Science, January 2003. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2003-04-25. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01258.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote

(1) Files submitted are response.xls (Excel 97 file), response.sav (SPSS Version 8 data file), and codebk.doc (Codebook in MS Word 97 format). (2) These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.

2003-04-25

2003-04-25

Notes

  • These data are flagged as replication datasets and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

ICPSR logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.