A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies (ICPSR 1115)

Published: Jun 10, 1996 View help for published

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Gary King; James E. Alt; Nancy Burns; Michael Laver

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01115.v1

Version V1

The literature on cabinet duration is split between two apparently irreconcilable positions. The ATTRIBUTES THEORISTS seek to explain cabinet duration as a fixed function of measured explanatory variables, while the EVENTS PROCESS THEORISTS model cabinet durations as a product of purely stochastic processes. In this paper, we build a unified statistical model that combines the insights of these previously distinct approaches. We also generalize this unified model, and all previous models, by including (1) a stochastic component that takes into account the censoring that occurs as a result of governments lasting to the vicinity of the maximum constitutional interelection period, (2) a systematic component that precludes the possibility of negative duration predictions, and (3) a much more objective and parsimonious list of explanatory variables, the explanatory power of which would not be improved by including a list of indicator variables for individual countries.

King, Gary, Alt, James E., Burns, Nancy, and Laver, Michael. A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996-06-10. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01115.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

1996-06-10

1996-06-10

2018-02-15 The citation of this study may have changed due to the new version control system that has been implemented. The previous citation was:
  • King, Gary, James E. Alt, Nancy Burns, and Michael Laver. A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies . ICPSR01115-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996-06-10. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01115.v1

Notes

  • These data are flagged as replication datasets and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

ICPSR logo

This study is provided by ICPSR. ICPSR provides leadership and training in data access, curation, and methods of analysis for a diverse and expanding social science research community.