[DDI-SRG] Ok we lost everyone but Arofan

[Joachim Wackerow]

Wendy,

Yes, that would be great if can this discuss on-line.

I think I have to review my suggested solutions regarding bug 116 (0 and 
1 in NCube and 2 and 3 in logical). I'll try to make related examples.

Also I'll write some examples for the inclusion of a codescheme below a 
code.

Regarding the difference between additional codes (like total) and 
existing codes of a standard codescheme you suggested to look at the 
Attribute stuff. I did that, it would work: making a new binary 
variable, which makes the difference between "new" and "old" codes and 
referencing this variable by the attribute in NCube. But I'm still 
wondering if there is not a cleaner solution. Because with the 
attributes you make everythink, in terms of machine-actionability it is 
not ideal.

Achim


Wendy Thomas wrote:
> I'm going to write these three items up as explicitly as I can and send 
> them out for comment...paricularly comment from Achim to make sure I have 
> them described correctly. This will include alternative solutions. If we 
> can get this discussed on-line that would be great. If not they will be on 
> next weeks agenda.
> 
> WEndy