From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Wed May 4 13:03:56 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Wed May 4 13:05:20 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Telephone conference and IASSIST Message-ID: <4279007C.5080409@za.uni-koeln.de> Dear all! I just wanted to get out three questions to you before I'm off for a long week-end (public holiday in Germany tomorrow): a) If it's o.k. with you I would like to organize a telephone conference on May 17th to discuss open questions and prepare our Working Group Meeting at IASSIST. b) What do you think about the schedule that Mary has send around? Do you think it's feasible or do we need more time? I personally think we should spend less time for presentations and outlines (e.g. on Sunday morning) than for actual work. c) We should be thinking about at least three things which should be done before Edinburgh: 1. set up an agenda, 2. prepare the list of scenarios for the Structural Reform Group, and 2. come up with a list of topics which have to be included in DDI 3 in order to document what we want. The list under 3 should be a short topic list, which can be filled with the details we are currently working on and which serves as a guideline for discussion. This is in my eyes important, because there will obviously be some experts present in Scotland, who do not participate in any Working Group and who might need those topics in advance to see which ground we are covering. I wouldn't like to get into details again, that we have already dicarded as not important for the development of version 3. Greetings from Cologne, yours Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From wlt at pop.umn.edu Wed May 4 15:52:53 2005 From: wlt at pop.umn.edu (Wendy Thomas) Date: Wed May 4 15:53:02 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Telephone conference and IASSIST In-Reply-To: <4279007C.5080409@za.uni-koeln.de> Message-ID: responses inserted On Wed, 4 May 2005, Oliver Watteler wrote: > Dear all! > > I just wanted to get out three questions to you before I'm off for a > long week-end (public holiday in Germany tomorrow): > a) If it's o.k. with you I would like to organize a telephone conference > on May 17th to discuss open questions and prepare our Working Group > Meeting at IASSIST. Not sure if I can do this one but don't have an alternative thats better > b) What do you think about the schedule that Mary has send around? Do > you think it's feasible or do we need more time? I personally think we > should spend less time for presentations and outlines (e.g. on Sunday > morning) than for actual work. Basically the working groups have a total of 6.5 hours. I am assuming that the Sunday reports may not take 2 hours and the working groups will start early. However, it will be Usabilities one chance to let people know what they're up to. The only working groups actually meeting are: Aggregate Data, Geography, Time Instrument documentation Comarative Data Usability, SDG, and Complex file people will be distributing themselves. Its important that we present clearly what will be covered and what we hope to accomplish at the working group meeting. Thats the only section that seems like it could possibly be reduced, but with 5 groups it would be difficult to schedule less time. > c) We should be thinking about at least three things which should be > done before Edinburgh: > 1. set up an agenda, > 2. prepare the list of scenarios for the Structural Reform Group, and > 3. come up with a list of topics which have to be included in DDI 3 in > order to document what we want. > Yes...can't think of anything to add. > The list under 3 should be a short topic list, which can be filled with > the details we are currently working on and which serves as a guideline > for discussion. This is in my eyes important, because there will > obviously be some experts present in Scotland, who do not participate in > any Working Group and who might need those topics in advance to see > which ground we are covering. I wouldn't like to get into details again, > that we have already dicarded as not important for the development of > version 3. > > Greetings from Cologne, > yours Oliver. > > -- > > GESIS - Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) > Oliver Watteler, M.A. > > Dokumentation und Archivierung > /Documentation and Archiving > > Bachemer Str.40 > 50931 Köln > Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 > FAX :++49-221-47694-44 > Web :http://www.gesis.org/za > > > > _______________________________________________ > DDI-CDG mailing list > DDI-CDG@icpsr.umich.edu > http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-cdg > Wendy L. Thomas Phone: +1 612.624.4389 Data Access Core Director Fax: +1 612.626.8375 Minnesota Population Center Email: wlt@pop.umn.edu University of Minnesota 50 Willey Hall 225 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 From reto.hadorn at sidos.unine.ch Tue May 10 04:07:05 2005 From: reto.hadorn at sidos.unine.ch (Reto Hadorn) Date: Tue May 10 04:11:28 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Some summaries In-Reply-To: <425F96E4.7080400@uta.fi> References: <425F96E4.7080400@uta.fi> Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.2.20050510100131.01e9c468@webmail.unine.ch> Hi Mari and colleagues, I have looked at your formalisation of the complex studies. You will find my comments in the attached document. I have also attached again the document I distributed a month ago, since I refer to it, so you don't have to grab in some overloaded attachment box again. I thank you for your ideas. I think that we can actually make some progress if we confront our constructions of the complex study space. So, beyond the specific remarks on the formalism you are using, we make a step forward. Best wishes Reto At 15.04.2005, Mari Kleemola wrote: >Hi all! > >As the Alliance meeting is approaching, I've been reading through the CDG >papers. It is obvious that we still lack shared concepts but the good >thing is that we seem to at least implicitly know what we are talking about. > >Being quite inexperienced in the field of documenting complec surveys, >I find the discussion so far interesting but a bit confusing. To clarify >my own thoughts, I wrote a couple of summary papers. I am not at all sure >whether I have caught all the essential ideas (or that those I have caught >I have understood right), but I've attached the summaries here in the hope >that they might prove helpful for the group and for our discussions. > >In the first paper I present just another way to think about the survey >typology and try to sum up the terms used. The second paper is a >collection of the "demands" to DDI, listed by the papers I found them in. >I thought this could help in deciding about possible new >elements/structures needed etc. For example the references/links between >different levels seems to pop up quite often. > >In the end of Reto's paper "Handling the repeated cross-national datasets >(draft 3, Hadorn, 7.3.2005)" he mentions the "demands to EKKE", would be >interesting to know more about them. > >All the best, >Mari > > > > >_______________________________________________ >DDI-CDG mailing list >DDI-CDG@icpsr.umich.edu >http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-cdg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CDG_thoughts_April2005_mk.rtf Type: application/rtf Size: 56484 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-cdg/attachments/20050510/71041c75/CDG_thoughts_April2005_mk-0001.rtf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Process4Synthetic_050411.doc Type: application/msword Size: 294912 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-cdg/attachments/20050510/71041c75/Process4Synthetic_050411-0001.doc From reto.hadorn at sidos.unine.ch Thu May 12 04:43:56 2005 From: reto.hadorn at sidos.unine.ch (Reto Hadorn) Date: Thu May 12 04:51:14 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] List of studies and examples of scenarios In-Reply-To: <42725588.2070100@za.uni-koeln.de> References: <42725588.2070100@za.uni-koeln.de> Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.2.20050512104210.01ea5a48@webmail.unine.ch> Dear Oliver and colleagues, Thanks for your list of examples. I feel it is a good exercise to apply the rather abstract study and dataset typology to cases, which all have their specificity. You will find my comments included in your list, in the attachments. Best wishes Reto At 29.04.2005, Oliver Watteler wrote: >Dear CDG, > >I am finally able to send out the two things we agreed on at the end of >our last conference call. We said that we will continue our work once we >get a hold of the draft for DDI 3, but this does not work. DDI's XML >developer needs our scenarios first to fill in some gaps. Well then, here >we go. I have attached the following documents: > >1. A list of "comparative" studies that also contains Reto's nomenclature >as far as I have understood it. Wendy has also drafted a list of >comparative studies in form of a table and I will fit "my" studies into >her list in order to get an overview of comparative or comparable surveys >that are out there. >This list has to be enhanced by you. Are you interested in the >methodological information I used (mostly from the different web-sites)? > >2. Some examples of scenarios where information is being compared. When we >talked about those scenarios, my understanding was that we want to break >down the study life cycle phases to the working steps and do not want to >stay on the general level of theoretical or methodological comparison. We >want do go down to the single information level also to see what can >already be documented with the current DDI and what is still missing. >I attached a list of four tables, which have to be read as follows. The >aim should be to come up with a complete description of a comparative >study?s life cycle that shows all working steps at a level where they >match information bits that in turn can be fit into DDI tags. Now, the >tables you see contain some of those single steps and not entire cycle >phase. Thus, my example 1 only talks about the agreement on questions that >serve as indicators. Of course phase 1, which is called ?Concept? in the >DDI life cycle model, also implies the gathering of information (e.g. >literature), the drafting of hypothesis or the ?assembly? of a >questionnaire. Those would be other working steps I could think of and >they too could be fit into tables. >One thing that we do not want to do, I suppose, is to go through the >development process of DDI 1 once again and think of all those things that >could possibly be compared, but stick to the real world and think of the >information bits which are really held against each other. > >Talking to Meinhard about the examples I realized that this lengthy >explanation was necessary. Maybe it would also be useful to insert the >existing DDI tags that are useful for comparison into tables like the ones >presented. What do you think? >The list of studies could be used to see how those studies could be marked >up with DDI (as has already been done in some case and has also been >discussed in the context of best practise examples). > >To talk about the time frame. We will meet in Edinburgh on May, 22nd. We >should organize at least one more confernece call before that and try to >come up with as many scenarios as possible. I will take up the job to >compile them afterwards. Any other things you can thinks of that need to >be done? > >Have a nice week-end, >yours Oliver. > >P.S.: Wendy! Thanks for the information. I will send around your enhanced >table next week. > >-- > >GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) > Oliver Watteler, M.A. > > Dokumentation und Archivierung > /Documentation and Archiving > > Bachemer Str.40 > 50931 K?ln > Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 > FAX :++49-221-47694-44 > Web :http://www.gesis.org/za > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >DDI-CDG mailing list >DDI-CDG@icpsr.umich.edu >http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-cdg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Comparative studies_examples.doc Type: application/msword Size: 57856 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-cdg/attachments/20050512/ef53eaaa/Comparativestudies_examples-0001.doc From mochmann at za.uni-koeln.de Thu May 12 05:08:47 2005 From: mochmann at za.uni-koeln.de (ekkehard mochmann) Date: Thu May 12 05:16:51 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] List of studies and examples of scenarios In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20050512104210.01ea5a48@webmail.unine.ch> References: <42725588.2070100@za.uni-koeln.de> <6.0.3.0.2.20050512104210.01ea5a48@webmail.unine.ch> Message-ID: <42831D1F.3060204@za.uni-koeln.de> Dear colleagues, we are about to conclude our EU funded project "Network of Economic and Social Science Infrastructures in Europe" (NESSIE). In this project we developed a pretty comprehensive list of comparative studies relevant for different disciplines- with focus on Europe. if you are interested in a more comprehensive list of comparative studies you may want to consult the NESSIE web page. There you may find some more relevant links and hints: http://www.nessie-essex.co.uk/dataResources.asp. Best regards, Ekkehard Reto Hadorn schrieb: > > > > Dear Oliver and colleagues, > > > Thanks for your list of examples. I feel it is a good exercise to > apply the rather abstract study and dataset typology to cases, which > all have their specificity. > > You will find my comments included in your list, in the attachments. > > > Best wishes > > Reto > > > > > At 29.04.2005, Oliver Watteler wrote: > >> Dear CDG, >> >> I am finally able to send out the two things we agreed on at the end >> of our last conference call. We said that we will continue our work >> once we get a hold of the draft for DDI 3, but this does not work. >> DDI's XML developer needs our scenarios first to fill in some gaps. >> Well then, here we go. I have attached the following documents: >> >> 1. A list of "comparative" studies that also contains Reto's >> nomenclature as far as I have understood it. Wendy has also drafted a >> list of comparative studies in form of a table and I will fit "my" >> studies into her list in order to get an overview of comparative or >> comparable surveys that are out there. >> This list has to be enhanced by you. Are you interested in the >> methodological information I used (mostly from the different web-sites)? >> >> 2. Some examples of scenarios where information is being compared. >> When we talked about those scenarios, my understanding was that we >> want to break down the study life cycle phases to the working steps >> and do not want to stay on the general level of theoretical or >> methodological comparison. We want do go down to the single >> information level also to see what can already be documented with the >> current DDI and what is still missing. >> I attached a list of four tables, which have to be read as follows. >> The aim should be to come up with a complete description of a >> comparative study?s life cycle that shows all working steps at a >> level where they match information bits that in turn can be fit into >> DDI tags. Now, the tables you see contain some of those single steps >> and not entire cycle phase. Thus, my example 1 only talks about the >> agreement on questions that serve as indicators. Of course phase 1, >> which is called ?Concept? in the DDI life cycle model, also implies >> the gathering of information (e.g. literature), the drafting of >> hypothesis or the ?assembly? of a questionnaire. Those would be other >> working steps I could think of and they too could be fit into tables. >> One thing that we do not want to do, I suppose, is to go through the >> development process of DDI 1 once again and think of all those things >> that could possibly be compared, but stick to the real world and >> think of the information bits which are really held against each other. >> >> Talking to Meinhard about the examples I realized that this lengthy >> explanation was necessary. Maybe it would also be useful to insert >> the existing DDI tags that are useful for comparison into tables like >> the ones presented. What do you think? >> The list of studies could be used to see how those studies could be >> marked up with DDI (as has already been done in some case and has >> also been discussed in the context of best practise examples). >> >> To talk about the time frame. We will meet in Edinburgh on May, 22nd. >> We should organize at least one more confernece call before that and >> try to come up with as many scenarios as possible. I will take up the >> job to compile them afterwards. Any other things you can thinks of >> that need to be done? >> >> Have a nice week-end, >> yours Oliver. >> >> P.S.: Wendy! Thanks for the information. I will send around your >> enhanced table next week. >> >> -- >> >> GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) >> Oliver Watteler, M.A. >> >> Dokumentation und Archivierung >> /Documentation and Archiving >> >> Bachemer Str.40 >> 50931 K?ln >> Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 >> FAX :++49-221-47694-44 >> Web :http://www.gesis.org/za >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DDI-CDG mailing list >> DDI-CDG@icpsr.umich.edu >> http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-cdg > From wackerow at zuma-mannheim.de Fri May 13 15:50:16 2005 From: wackerow at zuma-mannheim.de (Joachim Wackerow) Date: Fri May 13 15:50:37 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Classification scheme / formal logic of derived variables Message-ID: <428504F8.9000700@zuma-mannheim.de> Hello, Thinking of a list of topics which have to be included in DDI 3, I would like to mention two issues, which were not much discussed up to now. 1. Classification schemes to describe social science variables/classifications 2. Means to describe the formal logic of constructed variables. See attached document. For the discussion in Edinburgh with other people I think Reto?s diagram (2005-03-21) of cross-national and diachronic datasets is a good starting point, perhaps we should have some A3 printouts (sorry, we have no such printer at ZUMA). I would like to mention a recent discussion on the SRG, which could be of interest for this group, see the four emails "Comparative Data Direction", starting at: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/2005-May/000774.html Sorry, probably I will have no time at next Tuesday's conference call. I'm looking forward to the discussion in Edinburgh. Achim Below are some references/background links to the subjects in the attached document. CLASET (weak model) http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2004/02/metis/wp.26.e.pdf Neuchatel Terminology (complex model) http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2000/11/metis/10.e.pdf An analysis of the commonalities between the comparative data problem and the complex data problem, from I-Lin Kuo http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/2004-December/000599.html MathML http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/ MathML example for "IF (V1 == 5) OR (V2 >=3 AND V3 == 2)" http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-users/2004-January/000151.html MathML example included in a DDI 2.0 extension http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-cdg/2004-February/000008.html Rule Markup Initiative http://www.ruleml.org/ Common Logic, general http://philebus.tamu.edu/cl/ XML Common Logic (XCL) http://www.altheim.com/specs/xcl/1.0/index.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: classification and mathml.doc Type: application/msword Size: 34816 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-cdg/attachments/20050513/1d6c376f/classificationandmathml-0001.doc From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Tue May 17 02:41:00 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Tue May 17 02:42:35 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Conference call today Message-ID: <428991FC.8010305@za.uni-koeln.de> Good morning erverybody! As announced last week we will have the chance to talk some things through today. ICPSR is providing for a conference call at 4pm GMT. The changes to the list of participants so far: - Achim Wackerow will not be available. - Meinhard Moschner will work at home. The agenda for today should include the following: 1. The proposal sent out by the SRG. 2. An agenda for Edinburgh. 3. A list of major topics that have been made out for inclusion in version 3 of the DDI (also as basis for topic 1). So far I see: 2.1 translation and languages 2.2 (external) classification schemes 2.3 detailed derivation of variables We can add that this is a preliminary list. 4. Statement and content of a short paper that should be send out to the DDI Experts before Friday in order to prepare the ones that are not active but still participate in the Working Group meetings. It should include the agenda and the list of topics. 5. Open questions. If you have anything you want to be added you can do so at the beginning of the call. Talk to you later, yours Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Tue May 17 07:06:58 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Tue May 17 07:08:33 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Time for call today Message-ID: <4289D052.4010600@za.uni-koeln.de> Hi everyone, Reto just asked me whether the call today was at 6pm German time and I had to realize that Greewich Mean Time does not shift between Daylight Saving Time and back. Thus, we would be one hour later than last time. Sorry for that. I will try to reschedule the call to tomorrow Wednesday, 18th. If it works out we would make it 3pm GMT, which would equal 6pm Finnland 5pm Central Europe 4pm GB 11am Michigan 10am Minnesota 8am Washington State. Is that ok with you? It makes life a bit easier for all of us, I guess. Reto also suggested that I should prepare an agenda for IASSIST that we can discuss. I will try to get a draft out today. Greetings from Cologne, Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Tue May 17 09:27:26 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Tue May 17 09:29:02 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] New time for call Message-ID: <4289F13E.2000301@za.uni-koeln.de> Ok, thanks to Bree Gunther from ICPSR we have a new time slot for a call tomorrow, Wednesday, May 18th at 3pm GMT, which is 10am Ann Arbor time. Some of you have already contacted me about their availability and changes in phone number. Since I am the first person who will be called tomorrow I will tell the conference office at UoM about the changes. My apologies again for this last minute change. Talk to you tomorrow, Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Wed May 18 08:24:17 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Wed May 18 08:25:53 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Draft for agenda Message-ID: <428B33F1.8020609@za.uni-koeln.de> Dear all! I have drafted an agenda for our Working Group Meeting at IASSIST. Please check our website at: http://info1.za.uni-koeln.de/ddicdg/main.html Please hold your comments until the call at 5pm. Possible topics for today ahould be: 1. The proposal sent out by the SRG. 2. The agenda for Edinburgh. 3. A list of major topics that have been made out for inclusion in version 3 of the DDI (also as basis for topic 1). So far I see: 3.1 translation and languages 3.2 (external) classification schemes 3.3 detailed derivation of variables As Reto noted this is only the beginning of a list. We should extend it during the call. 4. Statement and content of a short paper that should be send out to the DDI Experts before Friday in order to prepare the ones that are not active but still participate in the Working Group meetings. It should include the agenda and the list of topics. 5. Open questions. Talk to you around 5, Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Wed May 18 10:09:30 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Wed May 18 10:11:05 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Where's my head ... Message-ID: <428B4C9A.2080802@za.uni-koeln.de> Hi, I've just been called by the ICPSR conference operator and I have obviously gotten it wrong again. Iris was expecting the call at 5pm, so was I, Peter was all right, and Reto was not home yet. Desaster. Well, we'll try again at 5pm CET 4pm GMT 11am Michigan 10am Minnesota. Sorry for all this. I'm favouring a World Standard Time now - no changes, no more daylight saving, no shifty shifting business ... Talk to you soo, Oliver. P.S.: For those of you who are not joining, never mind :-) -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Wed May 18 12:33:47 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Wed May 18 12:35:23 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Need for approval Message-ID: <428B6E6B.3040606@za.uni-koeln.de> Dear all, the participants in the call today (Iris, Peter, Reto and I) have agreed that we should make the drafting of a conceptual "map" the main taget for our Working Group Meeting. This "map" will comprise the concepts and topics that we consider to be "camprative" and that we want to see realized in DDI 3. Please have a look at today's minutes on the website and check the updated agenda. Do you agree? Greetings from Cologne, Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za From watteler at za.uni-koeln.de Fri May 20 05:33:57 2005 From: watteler at za.uni-koeln.de (Oliver Watteler) Date: Fri May 20 05:34:06 2005 Subject: [DDI-CDG] Agenda approved Message-ID: <61066.212.144.61.153.1116581637.squirrel@212.144.61.153> Hello everyone! Since I did not get any explicit nays on the agenda I take it as approved. Please make sure that you have read the papers from Reto and the proposal from the Structural Reform Group. See you on Sunday, Oliver. -- GESIS - Zentralarchiv f?r Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Oliver Watteler, M.A. Dokumentation und Archivierung /Documentation and Archiving Bachemer Str.40 50931 K?ln Tel.:++49-221-47694-76 FAX :++49-221-47694-44 Web :http://www.gesis.org/za