[DDI-ADG] standards for frequency (or lack thereof)

[Sandra.A.Cannon at frb.gov]

Mary,
In the time series world, decennial wouldn't buy you much but in the panel
study world the same doesn't hold.  Is a particular indicator for decennial
sufficient or would we be better to use the Yn indicator for such things?
Then Y10 would be decennial and Y2 would be biennial, etc.  I understand if
decennial is considered special enough to have its own code though.

/san/


-------------------------------------------------
San Cannon
Chief, Economic Information Management
Federal Reserve Board
Washington DC 20551
(202) 452-3710
scannon at frb.gov



                                                                           
             Mary Vardigan                                                 
             <maryv at icpsr.umic                                             
             h.edu>                                                     To 
                                       Sandra.A.Cannon at frb.gov, Katherine  
             08/03/2005 02:34          McNeill-Harman <mcneillh at mit.edu>   
             PM                                                         cc 
                                       ddi-adg at icpsr.umich.edu             
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [DDI-ADG] standards for         
                                       frequency (or lack thereof)         
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




San, Kate, and others,

This seems like a really good start on a controlled vocabulary for
frequency. Do we need an additional indicator for something like the
decennial U.S. Census?

Mary

At 04:24 PM 8/2/2005, Sandra.A.Cannon at frb.gov wrote:




>Kate,
>This may be where using common definitions from time series data would be
>useful.  There are many possible frequencies in the software that we use
>(which Arofan says they are contemplating building into SDMX).  I don't
>know if it's authoritative or definitive but it certainly seems to be
>exhaustive.  I've attached a listing in a PDF of an internal webpage I
>support here.
>
>More food for thought....
>
>/san/
>who is sorry she is going on holiday this week and will miss the next
>several calls on this topic... well, not very sorry... ;-)
>
>(See attached file: freq.pdf)
>
>-------------------------------------------------
>San Cannon
>Chief, Economic Information Management
>Federal Reserve Board
>Washington DC 20551
>(202) 452-3710
>scannon at frb.gov
>
>
>
>
>              Katherine
>              McNeill-Harman
>              <mcneillh at mit.edu
To
>              >                         ddi-adg at icpsr.umich.edu
>              Sent by:
cc
>              ddi-adg-bounces at i
>              cpsr.umich.edu
Subject
>                                        [DDI-ADG] standards for frequency
>                                        (or lack thereof)
>              08/02/2005 03:28
>              PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>I've looked around fruitlessly for any standard list of frequencies.  I
>looked at the ISO web site, but wasn't able to navigate to anything
helpful
>
>(maybe someone else is more familiar).  I did various web searches, to no
>avail.  I looked on the web sites and in reference books for bodies that I
>know collect/publish data at certain frequencies (e.g. IMF, World Bank).
>I even looked in the dictionaries in which I found the other definitions,
>and several economic dictionaries.
>
>None of the sources above define/list these terms in any way.  I'm
>beginning to wonder if terms may be too taken-for-granted to be listed in
a
>
>structured way.
>
>However, if nothing else, we could just go to a regular English dictionary
>for definitions of the terms.  For example, my Websters Collegiate
>Dictionary defines quarterly as "recurring, issued, or spaced at 3-month
>intervals."  This was the best that I found anywhere.  This wouldn't take
>care of our need for a list from which to work in the first place, but I
>expect we'd be able to brainstorm most. (and then the "other" option would
>cover the rest)
>
>Maybe others have other ideas or techniques they could try, but I think
I'm
>
>stuck.
>
>Kate
>
>___________________________________________
>Katherine McNeill-Harman
>Data Services Librarian
>Dewey Library for Management and Social Sciences
>Massachusetts Institute of Technology
>77 Massachusetts Avenue, E53-100
>Cambridge, MA 02139
>mcneillh at mit.edu
>617-253-0787
>
>_______________________________________________
>DDI-ADG mailing list
>DDI-ADG at icpsr.umich.edu
>http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-adg
>
>_______________________________________________
>DDI-ADG mailing list
>DDI-ADG at icpsr.umich.edu
>http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-adg

Mary Vardigan
Director, Collection Delivery
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)
University of Michigan
P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248
Phone: 734-615-7908
Fax: 734-647-8200
www.icpsr.umich.edu