Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation [Restricted Use]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
African Americans
alcohol abuse
client characteristics
college students
community participation
community health
community involvement
community service programs
continuing education
counties
crime
delinquent behavior
demographic characteristics
drug dependence
drugs
health policy
human services
intervention
juveniles
labor force
law enforcement
liquor law violations
middle schools
Native Americans
needs assessment
organizational structure
outcome evaluation
outreach programs
parents
planning
policies and procedures
pregnancy
program evaluation
public health
race
risk factors
schools
skill development
substance abuse
substance abuse treatment
tobacco use
training
treatment programs
young adults
zip code areas
The Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) National Cross-Site Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)'s SPF SIG initiative, which sought to: (1) prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities; and (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the state and community levels. This cross-site evaluation included the 21 states and territories CSAP funded in FY2004 (Cohort 1) and an additional 5 States funded in Cohort 2 in FY2005 that were funded for up to 5 years to implement the SPF. The SPF is a five-step prevention planning model that requires states to: (1) conduct a statewide needs assessment, including the establishment of a State Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW); (2) mobilize and build state and community capacity to address needs; (3) develop a statewide strategic plan for prevention; (4) implement evidence-based prevention, policies, and practices (EBPPP) to meet state and community needs; and (5) monitor and evaluate the implementation of their SPF SIG project. Under contract to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) with funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Westat, in collaboration with the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) and The MayaTech Corporation, implemented a multilevel, multi-method quasi-experimental design to evaluate SPF SIG's impact. The scope of the evaluation encompassed national, state, and community levels. The design included comparison conditions at both the state and community levels. These data represent Phase I of the restricted use data release and contains extensive data on state-level implementation, community-level implementation, and state-level infrastructure, as well as other reference elements. A subsequent release (Phase II) will include state- and community-level outcomes, as well as data on community-level implementation, community-level implementation fidelity, state-level sustainability, and mediating variables.
28921
http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28921.v2
03-24-2014
survey data
administrative records data
Information from quarterly management and oversight reports was extracted and coded to inform the cross-site evaluation about ongoing activities within each State. These data primarily concern staffing, SEOW/Advisory Council membership, challenges and successes for each SPF step (2004-2006).
State interviews were conducted to assess implementation of the SPF steps, cultural competence, and sustainability (2004-2009).
Members of the cross-site evaluation team coded State Strategic Plans (2005-2007)
Round 1 Interviews were conducted across 7 domains to assess state-level system changes in substance abuse prevention infrastructure and capacity (2003-2007).
Round 2 interviews were conducted across 6 domains to assess state-level system changes in substance abuse prevention infrastructure and capacity (2006-2009).
Community Partners completed the CLI using a Web-based system. Data were collected to evaluate the Community Partners' progress in implementing the SPF framework, expanding their prevention capacity, and selection and implementation of interventions, including EBPPPs. Part I of the survey collected data about each Community Partner's progress through the SPF steps (2007-2010).
Community Partners completed the CLI using a Web-based system. Data were collected to evaluate the Community Partners' progress in implementing the SPF framework, expanding their prevention capacity, and selection and implementation of interventions, including EBPPPs. Part II of the survey collected information about each of the specific intervention being implemented by each Community Partner (2007-2010).
Community Partners completed the CLI using a Web-based system. Data were collected to evaluate the Community Partners' progress in implementing the SPF framework, expanding their prevention capacity, and selection and implementation of interventions, including EBPPPs. The Geographic Area files contain information about the geographical coverage for each intervention (2007-2010).
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Guam
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Michigan
Missouri
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Carolina
Palau
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
United States
Vermont
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming
2005-08--2007-09
2006-12-14--2007-08-14
2008-09-15--2009-06-30
2008-10-15--2009-06-15
2006-07-01--2006-09-30
2005-12--2007-12
2008-01-01--2008-06-30
2008-07-01--2008-12-31
2009-01-01--2009-06-30
2009-07-01--2009-12-31
2010-01-01--2010-06-30
2005-12--2007-12
2008-01-01--2008-06-30
2008-07-01--2008-12-31
2009-01-01--2009-06-30
2009-07-01--2009-12-31
2010-01-01--2010-06-30
2005-12--2007-12
2008-01-01--2008-06-30
2008-07-01--2008-12-31
2009-01-01--2009-06-30
2009-07-01--2009-12-31
2010-01-01--2010-06-30