Social scientists and policy makers have long been interested in understanding the factors that shape public attitudes about a given policy issue. Logically, citizens should adopt policy preferences that further their private interests. However a vast body of research shows that self-interest is not strongly related to people's policy preferences. Instead what does appear to shape public attitudes is what social scientists call "symbolic predispositions--stable affective preferences (such as racial prejudice, ideology, nationalism, religion, or party identification) acquired through conditioning in pre-adult years.
The goal of this exercise is to explore attitude consistency and the ideological dimensions of attitudes about euthanasia. Frequency distributions and crosstabulations will be used.
This publication is related to the following dataset(s):
This resource is available only to users at ICPSR member institutions. Because you are not logged in, we cannot verify that you will be able to access this resource.
- Block, Susan D.; Sullivan, Amy M.. Attitudes about end-of-life care: A national cross-sectional study
- Borum, Marie L.; Lynn, Joanne; Zhong, Zhenshao. The effects of patient race on outcomes in seriously ill patients in SUPPORT: An overview of economic impact, medical intervention, and end-of-life decisions
- Caddell, David P.; Newton, Rae R.. Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician's role
- Duncan, O.D.; Parmalee, Lisa F.. Trends in public approval of euthanasia and suicide in the US, 1947-2003
- Givens, Jane L.; Mitchell, Susan L.. Concerns about end-of-life care and support for euthanasia
- Hopp, Faith P.; Duffy, Sonia A.. Racial Variations in End-of-Life Care
- Kessler, Daniel P.; McClellan, Mark B.. Advance directives and medical treatment at the end of life
- Matcha, Duane A.. The Sociology of Bioethics: Perspectives and Implications of Euthanasia
- Ward, Russell A.. Age and acceptance of euthanasia