Longitudinal Survey
Wave 1
Between March 1999 and December 1999 we interviewed a random sample of approximately 2,400 households
with children in low-income neighborhoods in Boston, Chicago, and San Antonio. Forty percent of the families
interviewed were receiving cash welfare payments at the time of the interview. Each household had a child
age 0 to 4 or 10 to 14 at the time of the interview. The child and the child's primary female caregiver
are the focus of the study. We gathered extensive baseline information at the initial personal interview
with the caregivers, we tested and assessed younger children, and we interviewed older children. Interviews
were conducted in-person using a computerized instrument. The table below describes the topics about which
children and their caregivers were interviewed or assessed. See the Wave 1 User's Guide (currently
on Public Release page) for a description of the study and the data file design.
Caregivers
- Demographics
- Education
- Labor Force Participation
- Family Background
- Self-Esteem/Self-Concept
- Networks
- Housing
- Neighborhoods
- Family Routines
- Home Environment
- Positive Behaviors
- Child Behavior Checklist
- Challenges to Parenting
- Parenting Style
- Time Use
- Father Involvement
- Child Support
- Financial Strain
- Welfare Participation
- Income
- Health & Disability
- Illegal Activities*
- Domestic Violence*
- Brief Symptom Inventory*
- Attitudes Toward Men and Marriage (wave 3 only)
Older Children
- Physical Measurements
- Woodcock-Johnson Letter-Word Identification and Applied Problems
- Schooling
- Child-Mother Relationship*
- Mother-Child Activities*
- Parental Monitoring*
- Father Involvement*
- Father-Child Relationship*
- Delinquency*
- Sex and Pregnancy*
- Brief Symptom Inventory*
Younger Children
- Physical Measurements
- Ages and Stages
- *Conducted by Audio-CASI
The second wave of data was collected between September 2000 and May 2001, when the focal children were
between 1 and 6 or 11 and 16 years old. Eight-eight percent of the children interviewed at wave 1 were
re-interviewed at wave 2. In the majority of cases, children at wave 2 continued to live with the same
caregivers they had at wave 1. For those cases, we interviewed the wave 1 caregiver again as a "continuing
caregiver" and did not collect information from the caregiver that should remain constant over time, e.g.,
birthdate, race, and family background.
In a handful of cases, children were residing with new caregivers at wave 2. We interviewed those focal
children in their new households and administered a modified instrument to their new caregivers. This
modified instrument collected demographic data on the new caregiver as well as information on when the
focal child came to live in the caregiver's home and the reason the focal child was no longer with
her wave 1 caregiver. In addition to interviewing the focal child's new caregiver, we also located
and interviewed the separated wave 1 caregiver. This design enables users to study both caregivers and focal
children longitudinally, without losing from the sample any dyad that separated between waves. The separated
caregiver provides information about herself and her current household, but does not report on the focal
child's well-being or her relationship with the focal child.
The data resulting from this design is provided in three wave 2 data files: one file contains information
on the focal children only (N=2,158); one file contains information on continuing caregivers and new
caregivers (N=2,187); and one file contains information on separated caregivers (N=63). See the Wave 2
User's Guide for a detailed description of the study and data file design.
Codebooks and information about how to obtain public-release data files from waves 1 and 2 are available
here. (Combine files from current questionnaires page and current public release page on a single page
called "public release.")
The third wave of data collection took place between February 2005 and January 2006, when the focal
children were between 5 and 10 or 15 and 20 years old. 79.7 percent of focal children who responded at
wave 1 participated at wave 3.
Following the design we implemented at wave 2, wave 3 interviews were administered to focal children
and to continuing, new, and separated caregivers. Only caregivers who were new since wave 2 were interviewed
as new caregivers. Caregivers who were new at wave 2 but with whom the child still co-resided at wave 3
were interviewed as continuing caregivers. Wave 1 caregivers who no longer resided with focal children
were interviewed as separated caregivers. New caregivers from wave 2 who were no longer co-residing with
focal children at wave 3 were not interviewed.
The number of separated caregivers (N=229) is greater than in wave 2 because some older adult focal
children were living independently (i.e., without a caregiver) at wave 3. The caregivers associated with
these independent youth were treated as separated caregivers rather than as continuing caregivers. Independent
youth (N=114) responded to the standard focal child interview but provided additional data on their household
membership, union history, income, and work and welfare experience.
Two supplemental components were added at wave 3: an administrative records study and a school study
including a teacher interview and the collection of students' academic records. The administrative
records study includes the collection of data from relevant agencies on survey respondents' employment
histories and use of various services since 1997. Approximately 75 percent of wave 3 respondents agreed
to participate in the administrative records study. The school study includes a web-based interview with
the focal child's teacher and the collection of academic records since 1997. Nearly 90 percent of
caregivers and children at wave 3 agreed to participate in the school study.
Data from wave 3 of the longitudinal survey will be publicly available in Summer 2007.