Really Cool
    Minority Data

Utilization for Quiet Revolution in the South: the Impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-1990 [Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia]

By default, the reports below show utilization for the last 12 months. To view a different range, please enter dates below.

Please note that this study was first released on 1996-10-01, and that our current reporting model only goes back three years (from today's date).

General Information

Unique Sessions

Total
Data/Documentation
Sessions
Data &
Documentation
Documentation
Only
Any Datasets/Files 61 = 20 41
DS0: Study-Level Files 61 = 0 61
DS1: Alabama Data 12 = 12 0
DS2: Georgia Data 3 = 3 0
DS3: Louisiana Data 2 = 2 0
DS4: Mississippi Data 2 = 2 0
DS5: North Carolina Data (All Cities) 2 = 2 0
DS6: North Carolina Data (Cities of 10,000 Population or More) 1 = 1 0
DS7: South Carolina Data 2 = 2 0
DS8: Texas Data 3 = 3 0
DS9: Virginia Data 2 = 2 0
DS10: Table 2.Z, Challenges to At-Large Elections, 1966-1989, Alabama Municipalities and Counties (ASCII Text) 2 = 2 0
DS11: Table 3.Z-A, Cases Challenging At-Large County Elections, Georgia, 1974-1990 (ASCII Text) 2 = 2 0
DS12: Table 3.Z, Cases Challenging At-Large City Elections, Georgia, 1974-1990 (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0
DS13: Table 4.Z, Challenges to At-Large and Multimember Districts, Louisiana Municipalities, 1971-1989 (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0
DS15: Table 6.Z-A, Challenges to At-Large Elections Between 1973 and 1989, North Carolina Counties (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0
DS17: Table 7.Z-A, Challenges to At-Large Elections, South Carolina Local Government (Cities and Counties), 1969-1989 (ASCII Text) 2 = 2 0
DS19: Table 9.Z, Challenges to At-Large Elections Between 1973 and 1990, Virginia Independent Cities and Counties (ASCII Text) 2 = 2 0

Notes

The numbers above are counts of unique sessions, not counts of how many files were downloaded. I.e., a value of 12 implies that users downloaded 1 or more files from the study as part of 12 discrete sessions/visits in this time period.

Please note that the numbers above do not include distribution of restricted-use or public-use data that are not web downloadable. E.g., data distributed on CD-ROM.

Unique Users

Total
Unique
Users
Faculty Grad.
Students
Undergrads Univ.
Staff
Other Anon.
Downloads
Any Datasets/Files 47 = 5 7 1 1 1 32
DS0: Study-Level Files 47 = 5 7 1 1 1 32
DS1: Alabama Data 7 = 4 2 0 1 0 0
DS2: Georgia Data 2 = 2 0 0 0 0 0
DS3: Louisiana Data 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS4: Mississippi Data 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS5: North Carolina Data (All Cities) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS6: North Carolina Data (Cities of 10,000 Population or More) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS7: South Carolina Data 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS8: Texas Data 2 = 1 1 0 0 0 0
DS9: Virginia Data 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS10: Table 2.Z, Challenges to At-Large Elections, 1966-1989, Alabama Municipalities and Counties (ASCII Text) 2 = 1 0 0 1 0 0
DS11: Table 3.Z-A, Cases Challenging At-Large County Elections, Georgia, 1974-1990 (ASCII Text) 2 = 1 0 0 1 0 0
DS12: Table 3.Z, Cases Challenging At-Large City Elections, Georgia, 1974-1990 (ASCII Text) 1 = 0 0 0 1 0 0
DS13: Table 4.Z, Challenges to At-Large and Multimember Districts, Louisiana Municipalities, 1971-1989 (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS15: Table 6.Z-A, Challenges to At-Large Elections Between 1973 and 1989, North Carolina Counties (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS17: Table 7.Z-A, Challenges to At-Large Elections, South Carolina Local Government (Cities and Counties), 1969-1989 (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0
DS19: Table 9.Z, Challenges to At-Large Elections Between 1973 and 1990, Virginia Independent Cities and Counties (ASCII Text) 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 0

Notes

All numbers in the table above are the number of unique users who downloaded one or more files from this study/dataset in the time period specified.

"Anon. Downloads" refers to users who download anonymously. Users who browse/download documentation files (only) are not required to login; some of our topical archives do not require login.

Please note that the numbers above do not include distribution of restricted-use or public-use data that are not web downloadable. E.g., data distributed on CD-ROM.

Downloads by Member Institutions

This study was downloaded by users at 8 institutions during the time period specified.

  • Brown University
  • Harvard University
  • Indiana University
  • Rice University
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of Nottingham
  • University of South Carolina
  • Yale University

Notes

Institutions are only listed when users from that institution authenticated/logged in. Non-authenticated members constitute a large portion of our users and are represented in the Unique Users/Unique Sessions tables, but not in the Downloads by Member Institutions table.